Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 63 No. 4 (2008)

Articles

Goldenrod (Solidago virgaurea L. ssp. virgaurea) reaction to foliar fertilization

  • Barbara Kołodziej
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2008.4.1
Submitted: May 25, 2020
Published: 2008-12-22

Abstract

In a four-year-long field experiment the effect of foliar fertilization with 2% Ekolist, the origin of diasporas and soil conditions on goldenrod morphological parameters, yields and chemical composition was studied. Experimental factors significantly affected morphological parameters, yields and chemical composition of goldenrod plants. Independently of the experimental factors, in the second and third years of goldenrod cultivation the highest yields of herb were obtained, whereas in the fourth year a considerable decrease of the yielding potential was observed. Significantly higher yields of Soliadaginis Herba characterized by the highest stems and inflorescences, and the content of leiocarposide and macroelements were collected on heavy loamy sand. On the other hand, the highest stems and inflorescences as well as yields of raw material and active compounds were noted on plots with plants obtained from diasporas collected from the natural state near Puławy, whereas the lowest one from Rabinówka. During four years of goldenrod culture, significantly heavier aboveground parts of plants (on average by 8%), characterised by the highest content of leiocarposide as well as mineral compounds content were found on the plots after Ekolist application.

References

  1. Bader G., Lück L., Schenk R., Hirschelmann R., Hiller K., 1998. Leiocarposid – lead structure for the quality assurance of Soliadginis virgaureae herba. Pharmazie, 53, 805–806.
  2. Berbeć S., Andruszczak S., Łusiak J., Sapko A., 2003. The effect of foliar application of Atonik and Ekolist on yields and quality of thyme raw material. Acta Agrophysica, 85, 305–311.
  3. Blumethal M., Busse W.R., Goldberg A., 1998. The complete German Commision E monographs. American Botanical Council, Austin and Integrative Medicine Communications, Boston.
  4. Bohr Ch., Plescher A., 1997. Empfehlungen für den Anbau von Echler Goldrute (Solidago virgaurea L.) in Thüringen. Drogenreport, 10 (18), 24–27.
  5. Bohr Ch., Plescher A., 1999. Optimation of the cultivation parameters of golden rod (Solidago virgaurea L.) relating to the yield of active compounds. Drogenreport 9 (14), 28.
  6. Galambosi B., Honkala Y., Jokela K., 1993. Production potential of wild and cultivated goldenrod (Solidago virgaurea L.) populations in Finland. Acta Hort. 344, 249–255.
  7. Gruszczyk M., Kiełtyka A., 2005. Yields and raw material quality of Hypericum perforatum L. and Solidago virga aurea L. from one-year and two-year plantations. Herba Pol. 51(1/2), 5–9.
  8. Hiller K., Bader G., 1996. Goldruten-Kraut. Die Gattung Solidago – eine pharmazeutische Bewertung. Portrait einer Arzeneipflanze. Z. Phytoterapie, Hippokrates GmbH Stuttgart, 17, 123-130.
  9. Kalemba D., 1992. Phenolic acids in four Solidago species. Pharmazie 47, 471–472.
  10. Kalemba D., 1998. Constituents of the essentials oil of Solidago virgaurea L. Flavour Fragm. J. 13, 373–376.
  11. Kołodziej B., 2002. The effect of soil material and nitrogen fertilisation on growth and development of goldenrod (Solidago virgaurea L.). Fol. Hort. 14/1, 187–193.
  12. Kołodziej B., 2007. The effect of NPK fertilisation on goldenrod (Solidago virgaurea L. ssp.virgaurea) yields and quality parameters. Herba Pol. 53(3), 129–134.
  13. Kołota E., Osińska M., 1994. Suitability of Ekolist for foliar fertilization in field production of vegetables. Biul. Warzyw. 65, 49–65.
  14. Kucharski W., Mordalski R., 2006. Optimalisation of nitrogen fertilization in goldenrod (Solidago virgaurea L.) cultivation for raw material. Herba Pol. 52 (3), 119.
  15. Lück L., Schenk R., Weber K., Bader G., Abel G., 2000. Wildherkünfte von Solidago virgaurea L. – Erträge und Variabilität morphologischer und phytochemische Merkmale. Z. Arzn. Gew. Pfl. 1, 20–27.
  16. Magdziak R., Kołodziej B., 2007. The effect of foliar fertilization on yield and quality of American ginseng roots (Panax quinquefolium L.). Herba Pol. 53(3), 98–103.
  17. Melzig M., 2004. Echtes Goldrutenkraut – ein Klassiker in der urologischen Phytoterapie. Wien Med. Wochenschr. 154 (21–22), 523–527.
  18. Yarnell E., 2002. Botanical medicines for the urinary tract. Word J. Urol. 20, 285–293.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.