Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Agronomy Science Baner text

Vol. 76 No. 1 (2021)

Articles

Influence of sowing date on the yield and seed quality of two soybean cultivars

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2021.1.3
Submitted: January 19, 2021
Published: 2021-05-12

Abstract

The aim of the research was to determine the reaction of two soybean cultivars to the different sowing date. The arrangement of weather conditions was variable in individual years and had a modifying effect on the assessed features and parameters. As a result, the seed yield ranged from 3.95 t‧ha–1 in 2017 to 4.81 t·ha–1 in 2018. Sowing seeds in the third decade of April resulted in a significant increase in the plant density before harvesting, but at the same time decreased the number of pods on the plant. The highest MTN was obtained after sowing the seeds at the latest date. Sowing seeds in the second decade of April allowed to obtain a higher seed yield by 0.37 t·ha–1 compared to sowing in the first decade of May. The May sowing date significantly increased the protein content in seeds in relation to the earliest sowing date. Protein and fat yields did not differ significantly in terms of variety and sowing date. The cultivar Alligator produced more pods on the plant, while the cultivar ‘Abelina’ produced seeds with a higher MTN. The cultivars studied did not differ significantly in seed yield, which amounted to 4.43 t·ha–1 on average.

References

  1. Bastidas A.M., Setiyono T.D., Dobermann A., Cassman K.G., Elmore R.W., Graef G.L., Specht J.E., 2008. Soybean sowing date: the vegetative, reproductive, and agronomic impacts. Crop Sci. 48(2), 727–740. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.05.0292
  2. Bateman N.R., Catchot A.L., Gore J., Cook D.R., Musser F.R., Irby J.T., 2020. Effects of planting date for soybean growth, development, and yield in the southern USA. Agronomy 10(596), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040596
  3. Calviño P.A., Sadras V.O., Andrade F.H., 2003a. Development, growth and yield of late-sown soybean in the southern Pampas. Eur. J. Agron. 19(2), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00050-3
  4. Calviño P.A., Sadras V.O., Andrade F.H., 2003b. Quantification of environmental and management effects on the yield of late-sown soybean. Field Crops Res. 83(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00062-5
  5. Divito G.A., Echeverría H., Andrade F.H., Sadras V.O., 2016. Soybean shows an attenuated nitrogen dilution curve irrespective of maturity group and sowing date. Field Crops Res. 186, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.11.004
  6. El Toum G.A., Khalifa N.M., Sid Ahmed A.M., Idris H.A., 2020. Effect of planting date and sowing method on yield and grain quality of soybean (Glycine max L.) under North Sudan conditions. Moroccan J. Agri. Sci. 1(2), 91–94.
  7. Faligowska A., Panasiewicz K., Szymańska G., Szukała J., Koziara W., Ratajczak K., 2019. Wpływ terminu siewu na plonowanie i wartość siewną nasion soi. Biuletyn IHAR, 285, 195–196.
  8. Ibrahim S.E., 2012. Agronomic studies on irrigated soybeans in central Sudan: II. Effect of sowing date on grain yield and yield components. Int. J. Agri Sci. 2(9), 766–773.
  9. Kessler A., Archontoulis S.V., Licht M.A., 2020. Soybean yield and crop stage response to planting date and cultivar maturity in Iowa, USA. Agron. J. 112(1), 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20053
  10. Khan A.Z., Shah P., Khalil S.K., Ahmed B., 2004. Yield of soybean cultivars as affected by planting date under Peshawar valley conditions. Nucleus 41, 93–95.
  11. Khan A.Z., Shah P., Khalil S.K., Taj F.H., 2003. Influence of planting date and plant density on morphological traits of determinate and indeterminate soybean cultivars under temperate environment. J. Agron. 2(3), 146–152. https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ja.2003.146.152
  12. Kotecki A., Lewandowska S. (red.) 2020. Studia na uprawą soi zwyczajnej (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) w południowo-zachodniej Polsce. Wyd. UP we Wrocławiu, 54–79.
  13. Kumagai E., Takahashi T., 2020. Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) yield reduction due to late sowing as a function of radiation interception and use in a cool region of northern Japan. Agronomy 10, 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010066
  14. Kumagai E., 2018. Effect of early sowing on growth and yield of determinate and indeterminate soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) cultivars in a cool region of northern Japan. J. Agric. Meteorol. 74(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.D-17-00009
  15. Kumar R., Singh K.K., Gupta B.R.D., Baxla A.K., Rathore L.S., Attri S.D., 2002. Optimum sowing dates for soybean in central India using CROPGRO and ClimProb symbiosis. Meteorol. Appl. 9(2), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1350482702002104
  16. Mourtzinis S., Specht J.E., Conley S.P., 2019. Defining optimal soybean sowing dates across the US. Sci. Rep. 9(2800), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38971-3
  17. Nico M., Miralles D.J., Kantolic A.G., 2019. Natural post-flowering photoperiod and photoperiod sensitivity: Roles in yield-determining processes in soybean. Field Crops Res. 231, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.10.019
  18. Pierozan Junior C., Kawakami J., Schwarz K., Umburanas R.C., Del Conte M.V., Müller M.M.L., 2017. Sowing dates and soybean cultivars influence seed yield, oil and protein contents in subtropical environment. J. Agric. Sci. 9(6), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v9n6p188
  19. Praczyk T. (red.), 2017. Instrukcja uprawy soi. Wyd. IOR-PIB w Poznaniu, 1–50.
  20. Rao M.S.S., Mullinix B.G., Rangappa M., Cebert E., Bhagsari A.S., Sapra V.T., Joshi J.M., Dadson R.B., 2002. Genotype x environment interactions and yield stability of food grade soybean genotypes. Agron. J. 94(1), 72–80.
  21. Rattalino Edreira J.I., Mourtzinis S., Conley S.P., Roth A.C., Ciampitti I.A., Licht M.A., Kandel H., Kyveryga P.M., Lindsey L.E., Mueller D.S., Naeve S.L., Nafziger E., Specht J.E., Stanley J., Staton M.J., Grassini P., 2017. Assessing causes of yield gaps in agricultural areas with diversity in climate and soils. Agric. For. Meteorol. 247, 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.07.010
  22. Robinson A.P., Conley S.P., Volenec J.J., Santini J.B., 2009. Analysis of high yielding, early‐planted soybean in Indiana. Agron. J. 101(1), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0014x
  23. Sadeghi S.M., Niyaki S.A.N., 2013. Effects of planting date and cultivar on the yield and yield components of soybean in north of Iran. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 8(1), 81–85.
  24. Setiyono T.D., Weiss A., Specht J.E., Bastidas A.M., Cassman K.G., Dobermann A., 2007. Understanding and modeling the effect of temperature and daylength on soybean phenology under high-yield conditions. Field Crops Res. 100(2–3), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.07.011
  25. Specht J.E., Hume D.J., Kumudini S.V., 1999. Soybean yield potential – A genetic and physiological perspective. Crop Sci. 39, 1560–1570. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961560x
  26. Tyagi S.D., Khan M.H., Teixeira Da Silva J.A., 2011. Yield stability of some soybean genotypes across diverse environments. Int. J. Plant Breed. 5(1), 37–41.
  27. Umburanas R.C., Yokoyama A.H., Balena L., Dourado-Neto D., Teixeira W.F., Zito R.K., Reichardt K., Kawakami. J., 2019. Soybean yield in different sowing dates and seeding rates in a subtropical environment. Int. J. Plant Prod. (13), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-019-00040-0
  28. Umburanas R.C., Yokoyama A.H., Balena L., Lenhani G.C., Teixeira Â.M., Krüger, R.L., Reichardt K., Kawakami J., 2018. Sowing dates and seeding rates affect soybean grain composition. Int.
  29. J. Plant Prod. 12(3), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-018-0018-y
  30. Uslu N., Esendal E., 1998. Response of inoculation and sowing date of soybean under Bafra plain conditions in the Northern region of Turkey. Trop. J. Agric. For. 22, 525–531.
  31. Woźniak E., Twardowski T., 2018. GMO – czy w Polsce możliwa jest hodowla zwierząt gospodarskich bez pasz GM? Nauka 3, 155–173.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.