Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Agronomy Science Baner text

Vol. 78 No. 2 (2023)

Articles

The evaluation of productivity effects of soybean cultivation [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] depending on soil tillage method

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2023.5081
Submitted: February 15, 2023
Published: 2023-09-26

Abstract

The research was conducted in 2016–2017, based on a field experiment conducted at the Agricultural Experimental Plant Kępa-Puławy, farm in Osiny (lubelskie province) belonging to the Soil Science and Plant Cultivation – State Research Institute in Puławy. The aim of the study was to assess the production effects of two soybean varieties (Aldana, Merlin) with different earliness classes depending on the method of soil preparation for sowing (plough cultivation, reduced tillage, strip tillage). The productivity of both soybean cultivars was differentiated by the course of weather conditions during the growing season and the tillage method used. Higher yield of soybeans (by 7%) was recorded in 2017, which was due to more favorable humidity conditions. The use of the strip till method in soybean cultivation in each year of the study resulted in a significant increase in seed yield compared to the yield obtained from simplified and full plough cultivation. The difference (on average for both years of research) in the level of yields obtained was 13% for simplified cultivation and 16% for full plough cultivation. The applied tillage method did not have a significant impact on the concentration of major nutrients in the seeds of both soybean cultivars. The seeds of the Merlin variety contained about 6% more protein than the Aldana varieties, and both varieties accumulated a similar amount of fat and fiber. Both evaluated varieties were characterized by similar elements of the yield structure (number of pods, seeds and seed weight on the plant, number of seeds in the pod).

 

References

  1. Adamič S., Leskovšek R., 2021. Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) growth, yield, and nodulation in the early transition period from conventional tillage to conservation and no-tillage systems. Agronomy 11, 2477. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122477 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122477
  2. Amini I., 2005. Determination of the best management for soybean cropping following barley. Soil Till. Res. 84, 168–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.11.002
  3. Bertheau Y., Davison J., 2011. Soybean in the European Union, status and perspective. In: D. Krezhova (ed.), Recent trends for enhancing the diversity and quality of soybean products. IntechOpen Access, London, UK, 3–47. Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/books/recent-trends-for-enhancing-the-diversity-and-quality-of-soybean-products/soybean-in-the-european-union-status-and-perspective [dostęp: 1.02.2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/18896
  4. Bethlenfalvay J.G., Franson L.R., Brown S.M., 1990. Nutrition of mycorrhizal soybean evaluated by the diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS). Agron. J. 82, 302–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200020025x
  5. Cheţan F., Cheţan C., Bogdan I., Pop A.I., Moraru P.I., Rusu T., 2021. The effects of management (tillage, fertilization, plant density) on soybean yield and quality in a three-year experiment un-der Transylvanian plain climate conditions. Land 10, 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020200
  6. Cheţan F., Rusu T., Cheţan C., Camelia Urda, Rezi R., Simon A., Bogdan I., 2022. Influence of soil tillage systems on the yield and weeds infestation in the soybean crop. Land, 11, 1708. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101708 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101708
  7. EUROStat, 2022. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/de [dostęp: 20.07.2022].
  8. Faligowska A., Szukała J., 2015. The effect of various long-term tillage systems on yield and yield component of yellow and narrow-leaved lupin. Turk. J. Field Crops 20(2), 188–193. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.76502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.76502
  9. FAOSTAT, 2022. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC [dostęp: 15.07.2022].
  10. Farmaha B.S., Fernández F.G., Nafziger E.D., 2012. Soybean seed composition, aboveground growth, and nutrient accumulation with phosphorus and potassium fertilization in no-till and strip-till. Agron. J. 104(4), 1006–1015. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0010
  11. Fecák P., Šariková D., Černý I., 2010. Influence of tillage system and starting N fertilization on seed yield and quality of soybean Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Plant Soil Environ. 56(3), 105–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/201/2009-PSE
  12. Gawęda D., Cierpiała R., Bujak K., Wesołowski M., 2014. Soybean yield under different tillage systems. Acta Sci. Pol., Hort. Cult. 13(1), 43–54.
  13. Gawęda D., Nowak A., Haliniarz M., Woźniak A., 2020. Yield and economic effectiveness of soybean grown under different cropping systems. Int. J. Plant Prod. 14, 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-020-00098-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-020-00098-1
  14. Kocira A., Staniak M., Tomaszewska M., Kornas R., Cymerman J., Panasiewicz K., Lipińska H., 2020. Legume cover crops as one of the elements of strategic weed management and soil quali-ty improvement. A Review. Agriculture 10, 394. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10090394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10090394
  15. Kordas L., 2005. Energy and economic effects of reduced tillage in crop rotation. Acta Sci. Pol., Agricultura 4(1), 51–59.
  16. Kotecki A., Lewandowska S., 2020. Studia nad uprawą soi zwyczajnej (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) w południowo-zachodniej Polsce [Studies on the Cultivation of Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Mer-rill) in South-Western Poland]. Wyd. UP Wrocław, Wrocław.
  17. Księżak J., Bojarszczuk J., 2022. The seed yield of soybean cultivars and their quantity depending on sowing term. Agronomy 12, 1066. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12051066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12051066
  18. Lanҫa Rodrígues J.G., Gamero C.A., Costa Fernandes J., Mirás-Avalos J.M., 2009. Effects of different soil tillage systems and coverages on soybean crop in the Botucatu Region in Brazil. Span. J. Agric. Res. 7 (1), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2009071-409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2009071-409
  19. Małecka I., Swędrzyńska D., Blecharczyk A., Dytman-Hagedorn M., 2012. Wpływ systemów uprawy roli pod groch na właściwości fizyczne, chemiczne i biologiczne gleby. Fragm. Agron. 29 (4), 106–116.
  20. Małecka-Jankowiak I., Blecharczyk A., Swędrzyńska D., Sawińska Z., Piechota T., 2016. The effect of long-term tillage systems on some soil properties and yield of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Acta Sci. Pol. Agricultura 15(1), 37–50.
  21. Martyniuk S., 2012. Naukowe i praktyczne aspekty symbiozy roślin strączkowych z bakteriami brodawkowymi [Scientific and practical aspects of legumes symbiosis with root-nodule bacte-ria]. Pol. J. Agron. 9, 17–22. Available online: https://iung.pl/PJA/wydane/9/PJA9_3.pdf [dostęp: 2.08.2022].
  22. Patil G., Mian R., Vuong T., Pantalone V., Song Q., Chen P. Shannon J., Carter T.C., Nguyen H.T., 2017. Molecular mapping and genomics of soybean seed protein: A review and perspec-tive for the future. Theor. Appl. Genet. 130, 1975–1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-017-2955-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-017-2955-8
  23. Pikul J.L. Jr., Carpenter-Boggs L., Vigil M., Schumacher T., Lindstrom M.J., Riedell W.E., 2001. Crop yield and soil condition under ridge and chisel-plow tillage in the northern Corn Belt, USA. Soil Till. Res. 60, 21–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00174-X
  24. Potratz D.J., Mourtzinis S., Lauer J.G.J., Arriaga F.J., Conley S.P., 2020. Strip-till, other manage-ment strategies, and their interactive effects on corn grain and soybean seed yield. Agronomy J. 112, 72–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20067
  25. Śliwa J., Zając, T., Oleksy A., Klimek-Kopyra A., Lorenc-Kozik A., Kulig B., 2015. Comparison of the development and productivity of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) cultivated in western Poland. Acta Sci. Pol. Agricultura 14, 81–95.
  26. Smagacz J., 2015. Uprawa roli jako element zrównoważenia środowiskowego produkcji roślinnej. Studia i Raporty IUNG – PIB 43(17), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.26114/sir.iung.2015.43.5
  27. Stipešević B., Jug D., Jug I., Žugec I., Stošic M., Kolar D., 2009. Influence of different soil tillage systems on soybean yield and yield components. Tarım Mak. Bilimi Derg. (Journal of Agricul-tural Machinery Science) 5(3), 263˗267.
  28. Święcicki W., Chudy M., Żuk-Gołaszewska K., 2007. Rośliny strączkowe w projektach badaw-czych Unii Europejskiej. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 522, 55–65.
  29. Szwejkowska B. 2012. Wpływ technologii uprawy na zawartość białka w nasionach soczewicy jadalnej (Lens culinaris Medic.), Ann. UMCS, sec. E Agricultura 67(2), 20–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2012.2.3
  30. Thrane M., Paulsen P.V., Orcutt M.W., Krieger T.M., 2017. Soy protein: Impacts, production, and applications (Ch. 2). In: S.R. Nadathur, J.P.D. Wanasundara, L. Scanlin (eds.), Sustainable protein sources, 23–45. Academic Press, Elsevier. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128027783000020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802778-3.00002-0
  31. Woźniak A., Soroka M., Stępniowska A., Makarski B., 2014. Chemical composition of pea (Pisum sativum L.) seeds depending on tillage systems. J. Elem. 19, 1143–1152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2014.19.3.484

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.