Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Agronomy Science Baner text

Vol. 78 No. 4 (2023)

Articles

Sowing date as a determinant of spatial structure and yield of sugar beet canopy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2023.5328
Submitted: January 12, 2024
Published: 2024-04-18

Abstract

In 2015–2016, research on sugar beet was carried out in the experimental field in Miedniewice belonging to the Experimental Station of the Institute of Agriculture of the Warsaw University of Life Sciences. The variability of plant and canopy traits of sugar beet during the growing season was assessed, as well as their impact on the final root mass of individual plants and the yield of this species depending on the sowing date. The number of plants, their living area, and the rate of plant development in the juvenile period most strongly determined the yield of sugar beet. The delaying of the sowing date by two weeks resulted in a decrease in root yield by 10.2 t‧ha–1 (16.9%), a decrease of plant density by 8.9 thous.‧ha–1 (9.2%) and the average final root mass by 14.0 g (2.1%) as well as a decrease of the sucrose content by 0.4 percentage points and an increase in the content of α-amino nitrogen and an increase of sodium and potassium ions content respectively by 1,1; 0.4 and 1.0 mmol‧kg–1 of pulp, i.e. by 14.0%; 9.5% and 2.4%.

References

  1. Çakmakçi R., Oral E. 2002. Root yield and quality of sugarbeet in relation to sowing date, plant population and harvesting date interactions. Turk. J. Agric. For. 26, 133-139. https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/agriculture/vol26/iss3/4
  2. Cariolle, M., Duval, R. 1994. Influence des populations et des varietes sur le composantes du rendement et sur la tare-terre. Publications de lʼInstitut Technique Français de la Betterave Industrielle. Compte rendu de travaux. Paris, 403, 413.
  3. Durr, C., Boiffin, J. 1995. Sugarbeet seedling growth from germination to first leaf stage. J. Agric. Sci. 124(3), 427-435. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960007338X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960007338X
  4. Dzieżyc J., Nowak L., Panek K. 1987. Dekadowe wskaźniki potrzep opadowych roślin uprawianych w Polsce. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 314, 11-32.
  5. Freckleton R.P., Watkinson A.R., Webb D.J., Thomas T.H. 1999. Yield of sugar beet in relation to weather and nutrients. Agric. For. Meteorol. 93, 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(98)00106-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(98)00106-3
  6. Hoffmann C.M. 2017. Changes in root morphology with yield level of sugar beet. Sugar Ind. 142, 420-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36961/si18549
  7. Hoffmann C.M., Engelhardt M., Gallmeier M., Gruber M., Märländer B. 2018. Importance of harvesting system and variety for storage losses of sugar beet. J. Food Sci. Technol. 143, 474–484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36961/si19782
  8. Jaggard K.W., Wickens R., Webb D.J., Scott R.K. 1983. Effects of sowing date on plant establishment and bolting and the influence of these factors on yields of sugar beet. J. Agric. Sci. 101(1), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600036479 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600036479
  9. Jaggard K. W., Dewar A. M., Pidgeon J. D. 1998. The relative effects of drought stress and virus yellows on the yield of sugarbeet in the UK, 1980-95. J. Agric. Sci. 130(3), 337-343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859698005371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859698005371
  10. Jaggard K. W., Qi A., Ober E. S. 2009. Capture and use of solar radiation, water, and nitrogen by sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). J. Exp. Bot. 60(7), 1919-1925. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp110
  11. Jaggard K.W., Qi A.M., Milford G.F.J., Clark C.J.A., Ober E.S., Walters C., Burks E. 2011. Determining the optimal population density of sugarbeet crops in England. Int. Sugar J. 113, 114-119.
  12. Kenter C., Hoffmann C.M., Märländer B. 2006. Effects of weather variables on sugar beet yield development (Beta vulgaris L.). Eur. J. Agron. 24, 62-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2005.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2005.05.001
  13. Kozak M., Madry W., Wyszyński Z. 2002. Metoda analizy wpływu masy korzeni z różnych frakcji na plon buraka cukrowego. Fragm. Agron. 19(2), 251-261.
  14. Lauer J. G. 1997. Sugar beet performance and interactions with planting date, genotype and harvest date. Agron J. 89(3), 469-475. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900030017x DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900030017x
  15. Mahmood S.A., Murdoch A.J. 2017. Within-field variations in sugar beet yield and quality and their correlation with environmental variables in the East of England. Eur. J. Agron. 89, 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.05.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.05.007
  16. Malnou C.S., Jaggard K.W., Sparkes D.L. 2006. A canopy approach to nitrogen fertiliser recommendations for the sugar beet crop. Eur. J. Agron. 25, 254-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.06.002
  17. Märländer B., Hoffmann C., Koch H. J., Ladewig E., Niemann M., Stockfisch N., Varrelmann M., Mahlein A. K. 2018. Sustainable intensification - a quarter century of research towards higher efficiency in sugar beet cultivation. Sugar Ind. 143, 200–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36961/si19362
  18. Michalska-Klimczak, B., Wyszyński, Z. 2010a. Plonowanie buraka cukrowego w zmiennych warunkach agrotechnicznych i siedliskowych. Cz. I. Plon i jakość korzeni a technologiczny plon cukru. Fragm. Agron. 27(1), 88-97.
  19. Michalska-Klimczak B., Wyszyński Z. 2010b. Plonowanie buraka cukrowego w zmiennych warunkach agrotechnicznych i siedliskowych cz. II. Struktura plonu i wartość technologiczna frakcji korzeni. Fragm. Agron. 27(1), 98-106.
  20. Michalska-Klimczak, B., Wyszyński, Z., Pačuta, V., Rašovský, M., Brezovský, O. 2020. Within-field variability of plant and canopy traits of sugar beet and their relation to individual root mass during harvest. Plant Soil Environ. 66, 437-445. https://doi.org/10.17221/325/2020-PSE DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/325/2020-PSE
  21. Milford G. F. J., Pocock T. O., Riley J., Messem A. B. 1985. An analysis of leaf growth in sugar beet. III. Leaf expansion in field crops. Ann. Appl. Biol. 106(1), 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1985.tb03108.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1985.tb03108.x
  22. Pavlů K., Chochola J., Pulkrábek J., Urban J. 2017. Influence of sowing and harvest dates on production of two different cultivars of sugar beet. Plant Soil Environ. 63, 76–81. https://doi.org/10.17221/614/2016-PSE DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/614/2016-PSE
  23. Petkeviciene, B. 2009. The effects of climate factors on sugar beet early sowing timing. Agron. Res. 7, 436-443.
  24. Pocock T. O., Milford G. F. J., Armstrong M. J. 1990. Storage root quality in sugarbeet in relation to nitrogen uptake. J. Agric. Sci. 115(3), 355-362. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600075791 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600075791
  25. Rozbicki J., Kalinowska-Zdun M. 1993. Badania nad wpływem struktury morfologicznej łanu na plon i wartość technologiczną buraka cukrowego na tle sposobu siewu i nawożenia azotem. Cz. 2. Plon sacharozy i wartość technologiczna korzeni. Rocz. Nauk Rol., Ser. A. 110 (1-2), 77–84.
  26. Smit A. L. 1993. The influence of sowing date and plant density on the decision to resow sugar beet. Field Crops Res. 34(2), 159-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(93)90004-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(93)90004-7
  27. Sögüt T., Aroglu H. 2004. Plant density and sowing date effects on sugar beet yield and quality. J. Agron. 3, 215-218. https://doi.org/10.3923/ja.2004.215.218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ja.2004.215.218
  28. Stibbe C., Märländer B. 2002. Field emergence dynamics significance to intraspecific competition and growth efficiency in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Eur. J. Agron. 17, 161-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00005-9
  29. Wyszyński Z. 2006. Variability of the number and arrangement of plants in a sugar beet canopy under environmental and agrotechnical factors. Sci. Agric. Bohem. 37, 133-139.
  30. Xu, Y., Liu, D., Shi, J., Wang, X., Geng, G., Liu, J., Wang, Y. 2023. Effect of Plant Spacing on Growth and Yield Formation of Sugar Beet Taproot. Int. J. Plant Prod. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-023-00274-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2790996/v1

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.