Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Agronomy Science Baner text

Vol. 78 No. 1 (2023)

Articles

Effect of mineral nitrogen fertilization on the yield and tubers quality of very early and early potato varieties grown on the early harvest

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2023.4995
Submitted: November 4, 2022
Published: 2023-06-09

Abstract

In the years 2017–2019, two-factor experiments were carried out at PBAI–NRI Jadwisin Branch on light soil. The aim of the study was to determine mineral nitrogen fertilization on the yield and selected quality features of tubers of potato varieties grown for early harvest, as well as the requirements for the optimal dose of nitrogen. Yield and tuber quality were assessed after harvest, 75 days after potato planting. The quality of tubers was assessed on the basis of structure (share of small, medium and large tubers in the yield), external defects (share of deformed, green and scab-infested tubers in the yield), starch and nitrates (V) content in tubers. On the basis of the regression function, the requirements of the varieties in relation to the optimal dose l of nitrogen were determined. The experimental factors were: nitrogen dose (50, 100, 150 kg·ha–1 and the object without nitrogen) and varieties (Bohun, Lady Rosetta, Lawenda, Madeleine, Magnolia – edible, early and Tonacja – edible, very early). The use of a nitrogen dose of 50 kg N·ha–1 contributed to a significant increase in yield and starch content in tubers. Under the influence of the nitrogen dose in the amount of 100 and 150 kg N·ha–1, a significant decrease in the share of small tubers – with a diameter of less than 30 mm, medium tubers – with a diameter of 31–60 mm, and an increase in the share of large tubers – with a diameter above 60 mm, was obtained in the yield structure, and nitrate (V) levels in tubers. The tested varieties showed different requirements in relation to the optimal dose of nitrogen, from 72 to 95 kg N·ha–1. The varieties Lawenda and Magnolia were the most predisposed to grown on early harvest.

References

  1. Assunção N.S., Fernandes A.M., Soratto R.P., Mota L.H.S., Ribeiro N.P., Leonel M., 2021. Tuber yield and quality of two potato cultivars in response to nitrogen fertilizer management. Potato Res. 64(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-020-09469-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-020-09469-7
  2. Badr M.A., El-Tohamy W.A., Zaghloul A.M. 2012. Yield and water use efficiency of potato grown under different irrigation and nitrogen levels in an arid region. Agric. Water Manag. 110, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.03.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.03.008
  3. Clément C.C., Cambouris A.N., Ziadi N., Zebarth B.J., Karam A., 2021. Potato yield response and seasonal nitrate leaching as influenced by nitrogen management. Agronomy 11(10), 2055. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11102055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11102055
  4. Fontes P.C.R., Braun H., Busato C., Cecon P.R., 2010. Economic optimum nitrogen fertilization rates and nitrogen fertilization rate effects on tuber characteristics of potato cultivars. Potato Res. 53, 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-010-9160-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-010-9160-3
  5. Giletto C.M., Echeverría H.E. 2015. Critical nitrogen dilution curve in processing potato cultivars. Am. J. Plant Sci. 6(19), 3144–3156. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2015.619306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2015.619306
  6. Grudzińska M., Zgórska K., 2008. Wpływ warunków meteorologicznych na zawartość azotanów (V) w bulwach ziemniaka. Żywn. Nauka. Technol. Jakość 5(60), 98–106.
  7. Hmelak Gorenjak A., Cencič A., 2013. Nitrate in vegetables and their impact on human health. A review. Acta Aliment. 42(2), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1556/AAlim.42.2013.2.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/AAlim.42.2013.2.4
  8. Jabłoński K., 2006. Wpływ poziomu nawożenia azotem na plon i zawartość skrobi oraz na jakość nowych odmian ziemniaka. Zesz. Probl. Postęp. Nauk Rol. 512, 193–200.
  9. Kołodziejczyk M., 2014. Effect of nitrogen fertilization and microbial preparations on potato yield-ing. Plant Soil Environ. 60(8), 379–386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/7565-PSE
  10. Kumar P., Pandey S.K., Singh B.P., Singh S.V., Kumar D., 2007. Effect of nitrogen rate on growth yield, economics and crisps quality of Indian potato processing cultivars. Potato Res. 50, 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-008-9034-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-008-9034-0
  11. Lombardo S., Pandino G., Mauromicale G., 2020. Optimizing nitrogen fertilization to improve qualitative performances and physiological and yield responses of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Agronomy 10(3), 352. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030352
  12. Lutomirska B., Jankowska J., 2012. Występowanie deformacji i spękań bulw ziemniaka w zależno-ści od warunków meteorologicznych i odmiany. Biul. IHAR 266, 131–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37317/biul-2012-0013
  13. Merck, 2022. Azotany test 16971. https://www.merckmillipore.com/PL/pl/product/Nitrate-Test,MDA_CHEM-116971 [dostęp: 26.10.2022].
  14. Fotyma E. 2002. Efektywność i opłacalność nawożenia.W: Mercik S. (red.), Chemia rolna – pod-stawy teoretyczne i praktyczne. Wyd. SGGW, Warszawa, 237–245.
  15. Naumann M., Koch M., Thiel H., Gransee A., Pawelzik E., 2020. The importance of nutrient man-agement for potato production part II: plant nutrition and tuber quality. Potato Res. 63, 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-019-09430-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-019-09430-3
  16. Nowacki W. (red.), 2020. Metodyka integrowanej produkcji ziemniaków. Wyd. IV.
  17. Nowacki W. (red.), 2022. Charakterystyka krajowego rejestru odmian ziemniaka. Wyd. XXV. IHAR–PIB Oddz. Jadwisin.
  18. Öztürk E., Kavurmacı Z., Kara K., Polat T., 2010. The effects of different nitrogen and phosphorus rates on some quality traits of potato. Potato Res. 53, 309–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-010-9176-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-010-9176-8
  19. Piekutowska M., Niedbała G., Piskier T., Lenartowicz T., Pilarski K., Wojciechowski T., Czechow-ska-Kosacka A., 2021. The application of multiple linear regression and artificial neural net-work models for yield prediction of very early potato cultivars before harvest. Agronomy 11(5), 885. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050885 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050885
  20. PN-EN ISO 10520, 2002. Oznaczenie zawartości skrobi. Polarymetryczna metoda Ewersa. PKN, Warszawa.
  21. Rens L.R., Zotarelli L., Rowland D.L., Morgan K.T., 2018. Optimizing nitrogen fertilizer rates and time of application for potatoes under seepage irrigation. Field Crops Res. 215, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.10.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.10.004
  22. Rozporządzenie (WE) nr 1881/2006 Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady z dnia 19 grudnia 2006 r. ustalające najwyższe dopuszczalne poziomy niektórych zanieczyszczeń w środkach spożyw-czych (Dz. Urz. UE L364/5, s. 11, z 20.12.2006).
  23. Roztropowicz S. (red.), 1999. Metodyka obserwacji, pomiarów i pobierania prób w agrotechnicz-nych doświadczeniach z ziemniakiem. IHAR Oddz. Jadwisin.
  24. Rymuza K., Radzka E., Lenartowicz T., 2015a. The effect of weather conditions on early potato yields in east-central Poland. Commun. Biometry Crop Sci. 10(2), 65–72.
  25. Rymuza K., Radzka E., Lenartowicz T., 2015b. Wpływ warunków środowiskowych na zawartość skrobi w bulwach odmian ziemniaka średnio wczesnego. Acta Agroph. 22(3), 279–289.
  26. Rymuza K., Bombik A., Stopa D., 2016. Wpływ wysokości redliny i temperatury zbioru na wystę-powanie wad zewnętrznych bulw ziemniaka. Fragm. Agron. 33(3), 80–91.
  27. Sawicka B., Michałek W., Pszczółkowski P., 2011. Uwarunkowania potencjału plonowania średnio późnych i późnych odmian ziemniaka w warunkach środkowo-wschodniej Polski. Biul. IHAR 259, 219–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1470.0168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37317/biul-2011-0071
  28. Sądej W., Namiotko A., 2011. Nitrates (V) content in potato tubers cultivated under various fertili-zation systems. Ecol. Chem. Engineer. A 18(8), 1123–1130.
  29. Sellam V., Poovammal E., 2016. Prediction of crop yield using regression analysis. Ind. J. Sci. Technol. 2016, 9(38), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i38/91714 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i38/91714
  30. Skowera B., 2014. Zmiany warunków hydrotermicznych na obszarze Polski (1971−2010). Fragm. Agron. 31(2), 74–87.
  31. Tehulie N.S., Misgan T., 2019. Review on the effects of nitrogen fertilizer rates on growth, yield components and yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Int. J. Res. Agron. 2(2), 51–56.
  32. TIBCO Statistica, 2017. TIBCO Statistica v. 13.3.0, TIBCO Software Inc, Palo Alto, CA, USA. https://www.tibco.com/products/tibco-statistica [dostęp: 23.05.2023].
  33. Trawczyński C., 2004. Zależność między dawką azotu a plonem odmian ziemniaka. Biul. IHAR 232, 131–140.
  34. Trawczyński C., 2019. Influence of nitrogen fertilization on the yield, quality and nitrogen utilization efficiency of early potato tubers harvested on two dates. J. Elem., 24(4), 1253–1267. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2019.24.1.1799 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2019.24.1.1799
  35. Trawczyński, C. 2020. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on yield efficiency and quality of tubers potato varieties cultivated in an integrated production system. Biul. IHAR 288, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.37317/biul-2020-0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37317/biul-2020-0002
  36. Trawczyński C. 2021. Assessment of mineral nitrogen fertilization of early potato varieties in inte-grated production. J. Elem., 26(1), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2020.25.4.2066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2020.25.4.2066
  37. Vos J., 2009. Nitrogen responses and nitrogen management in potato. Potato Res., 52, 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-009-9145-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-009-9145-2
  38. Wierzbicka A., 2012. Wpływ odmiany, nawożenia azotem i terminu zbioru na zawartość suchej masy i skrobi w bulwach ziemniaków wczesnych. Fragm. Agron. 29(2), 134–142.
  39. Wierzbicka A., Mazurczyk W., Wroniak J. 2008. Wpływ nawożenia azotem i terminu zbioru na plon i wybrane cechy jakości bulw wczesnych odmian ziemniaka. Zesz. Probl. Postęp. Nauk Rol. 530, 207–216.
  40. WRB, 2014. World reference database for soil resources 2014. International soil classification sys-tem for naming soil and creating legends for soil maps. Word Soil Resources Reports 106.
  41. Yadav S.K., Singh G.K., Jain V.K., Tiwari A., 2017. Response of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars to different levels of nitrogen. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 6(8), 2734–2739. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.608.327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.608.327
  42. Zebarth B.J., Belanger G., Cambouris A.N., Ziadi N., 2012. Nitrogen fertilization strategies in relation to potato tuber yield, quality, and crop N recovery. W: Z. He, R.P. Larkin, C.W. Hon-eycutt (red.), Sustainable potato production. Global Case Studies, Springer New York, 165–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4104-1_10
  43. Zgórska K., Grudzińska M., 2004. Zawartość azotanów (V) w bulwach ziemniaka po obróbce wstępnej i termicznej. Zesz. Probl. Postęp. Nauk Rol. 500, 475–481.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.