Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
ASPTA Baner

Vol. 10 No. 1-2 (2011)

Artykuły

Technical, technological and health safety aspects smoking of meat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/aspta.2011.1-2.4
Submitted: March 18, 2022
Published: 2011-06-30

Abstract

Main factors deciding of characteristics of smoked meat products are the method and conditions of smoke generation and wood species. Usually the smoke is generated by using wood or chips of hard deciduous trees. The smoke can be produced through the slow, controlled incineration, pyrolysis, glowing or rubbing of wood with the defined humidity. The smoking process may be conducted in various temperatures, various smoke dencidity and air circulation in the smoking chamber. Improper smoking conditions, and in particular conditions of smoke generating, can lead to elevated accumulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), sixteen of then are regarded as potentially carcinogenic agents, in smoked goods. This threat is eliminated when the traditional smoking processes are replaced by treatment with liquid smoke preparations which can be derived through elimination of hazardous PAHs and tar substances from smoke condensates. These preparations replace the traditional smoke in all aspects because they ensure the characteristic, delicate color of smoked products, delicate aroma and act as antibacterial and antioxidative agents thereby contributing to the increased shelf-life.

References

  1. Berzins A., Hoerman A., Lunden J., Korkeala H., 2007. Factors associated with Listeria monocytogenes contamination of cold-smoked pork products produced in Latvia and Lithuania. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 115 (2), 173–179.
  2. Ciecierska M., Obiedziński M., 2007. Influence of smoking process on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons’ content in meat products. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Alim., 6 (4), 17–28.
  3. Djinovic J., Popovic A., Spiric A., Turubatovic L., Jira W., 2008. 16 EU priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the wood smoke and in smoked ham. Tehnolog. Mesa, 49 (5–6), 185–187.
  4. Flores J., 1997. Mediterranean vs northern European meat products. Processing technologies and main differences. Food Chem., 59, 505–510.
  5. Hattula T., Elfving K., Mroueh U.-M., Luoma T.T., Hattula K., Elfving U.-M., Mroueh T., 2001. Use of liquid smoke flavouring as an alternative to traditional flue gas smoking of rainbowtrout fillets (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Lebens. Wiss. Technol., 34 (8), 521–525.
  6. Jimenez-Colmenero F., Carballo J., Cofrades S., 2010. Healthier meat and meat products: their role as functional foods. Meat Sci., 84 (1), 1–13.
  7. Kuhn K., Seidel A., Lampen A., Nowak B., Behnke A., 2009. Effect-based and chemical analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in smoked meat: a practical food-monitoring approach. Food Addit. Contam. A, 26 (7), 1104–1112.
  8. Ma M. Chen L., 2003. Using smokeless smoking to decrease content of carcinogenic 3,4-benzo–pyrene from traditional cured meat product. Shipin Kexue (Beijing, China), 24 (8), 29–33.
  9. Martuscelli M., Lupieri L., Neri, L., Manetta, A.C., Pittia, P., Casamassima, L.M., 2009. Effect of intensity of smoking treatment on the free amino acids and biogenic amines occurrence in dry cured ham. Food Chem., 116 (4), 955–962.
  10. Maryniak B., 2010. Kontrolowane wędzenie – bezpieczne i ekonomiczne. Kalejdoskop Mięsny., (1) 53–58.
  11. McIlven H., Valley G., 1996. Something’s smoking in the development kitchen. Nutr. Food Sci., 96 (6) 34–38.
  12. Michalski M., 2010. Rodzaje i systemy wędzenia produktów pochodzenia zwierzęcego. Kalejdoskop Mięsny, 1, 48–52.
  13. Rahman M.S., 2007. Food Preservation: Overview. [In:] Handbook of Food Preservation. ed. By Rahman M.S., Boca R. 2nd ed. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group. s. 3–18.
  14. Rahman M.S., Perera C O., 2007. Drying and Food Preservation. [In:] Handbook of Food Preservation. ed. by Rahman M.S. Boca Raton. 2nd ed. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group. s. 403–432.
  15. Sebastian P., Rivier M., Collignan A., Bruneau D., 2005. Drying and smoking of meat: heat and mass transfer modeling and experimental analysis. J. Food Eng., 70(2), 227–243.
  16. Šimko P., 2005. Factors affecting elimination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from smoked meat foods and liquid smoke flavorings. Mol. Nutr. Food Res., 49(10), 639–647.
  17. Vandendriessche F., 2008. Meat products in the past, today and in the future. Meat Sci., 78, (1–2), 104–113.
  18. Zin M., Znamirowska A., 2003. Historia konserwowania mięsa. Gospod. Mięsna, 55 (1), 22–26.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.