Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 18 No. 3 (2008)

Articles

Effect of sodium chloride on seed germination and biomass of ornamental plants from the families of Amaranthaceae and Chenopodiaceae

Submitted: July 29, 2019
Published: 2008-09-29

Abstract

The work studies  the effect of de-icing salt on seed germination and biomass by plants from Amaranthaceae and from Chenopodiaceae families.  Amaranthaceae were germinating at: 17, 34, 69, 138, 172 mM NaCl while Chenopodiaceae at: 34, 69, 103, 138, 172, 207, 241, 276, 310, 345 mM NaCl. For the evaluation of the effect of NaCl treated with salt concentrations: 34, 103, 241, 517 mM NaCl, at autotrophy growth stage plants were grown in substrate in greenhouse conditions. Results showed that salinity delayed and reduced seed germination. Plants from Chenopodiaceae tolerate salinity at this growing stage betterthan those from Amaranthaceae. In plants grown in greenhouse the biomass was lowered when plants were grown in salinity of medium but for some genotypes slight stimulation was recorded in a lower level of salinity. There were great genotypic differences in these responses. 

References

  1. Chaparzadeh N., D’Amico M.L., Khavari-Nejad R-A., Izzo R., Navari-Izzo F. 2004. Antioxidative responses of Calendula officinalis under salinity conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 42, 695–701.
  2. Ishikawa S-I., Kachi N. 2000. Differential salt tolerance of two Artemisia species growing in contrasting coastal habitats. Ecol. Res. 15, 241–247.
  3. Katembe W.J., Ungar I.A., Mitchell J.P. 1998. Effect of salinity germination and seedling growth of two Atriplex sp. (Chenopodiaceae). Ann. Bot. 82, 167–175.
  4. Khan M.A., Ungar I.A., Showalter A.M. 2000. Effects of salinity on growth water relations and ion accumulation of the subtropical perennial halophyte, Atriplex griffithii var, stocksii. Ann. Bot. 85, 225–232.
  5. Kumar S.G., Reddy A. M., Sudhakar Ch. 2003: NaCl effects on proline metabolism in two yielding genotypes of mulberry (Morus alba L.) with contrasting salt tolerance. Plant Sci. 165, 1245–1251.
  6. Liu F., Stützel H. 2002. Leaf water relations of vegetable amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) in response to soil drying. Europ. J. Agron. 16, 137–150.
  7. Paredes-Lopez O. 1994. Amaranth biology, chemistry, and technology. CRC Press London, UK, 132–183.
  8. Pipper H. 1952. Das Saatgut. Ed. P. Parey, Berlin.
  9. Verslues P.E., Agarwal M., Katiyar-Agarwal S., Zhu J., Zhu J-K. 2006. Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stress that affect plant water status. Plant J. 45, 523–539.
  10. Wilson C., Lesch S. M., Grieve C. M. 2000. Growth stage Modulates salinity tolerance of New Zaland spinach (Tetragonia tetragonioides, Pall.) and Red Orach (Atriplex hortensis L.). Ann. Bot., 85, 501–509.
  11. Zapata P.J., Serrano M., Pretel M. T,. Amorós A., Botella M.A. 2003. Changes in ethylene and polyamine profiles of seedlings of nine cultivars of Lactuca sativa L. in response to salt stress during germination. Plant Sci. 164, 557–563.
  12. Zapata P.J., Serrano M., Pretel M. T., Amorós A., Botella M.A. 2004. Polyamines and ethylene changes during germination of dufferent plant species under salinity. Plant Sci. 167, 781–788.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.