Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 32 No. 2 (2023)

Articles

Changes in the content of selected mineral elements in highbush blueberry leaves (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) during the growing season

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/ah.2023.5312
Submitted: December 5, 2023
Published: 2024-04-22

Abstract

The study of changes in the content of selected nutrients in highbush blueberry leaves during the vegetation period and the nutritional assessment on a very acidic mineral soil developed from loamy sand and low humus content (1.25%) were carried out in years 2012–2014. Statistical analysis of the obtained results showed significant changes in the content of all tested nutrients during the growing season. The content of N, P and K in highbush blueberry leaves decreased, while Mg and Ca increased. Highbush blueberry varieties differed significantly in the content of the tested nutrients at each determination date. On the first date of assessment (Dutch method – mid-June), corresponding to the second date in the experiment, low content of N, P, Mg and Ca was found in the leaves of all assessed cultivars. Only the optimal K content was found, but only for the ‘Ivanhoe’, ‘Northland’ and ‘Spartan’ cultivars. The nutritional status of leaves was also assessed on the third experimental date, which was compared with the limit numbers for the commonly used so-called American method (turn of July/August – after the first harvest of cv. ‘Bluecrop’). The assessment of the nutritional status showed a low P content, optimal in the case of K, while in the case of the remaining nutrients it gave ambiguous results. Regardless of the variety, the N content was at the optimal level, but only for the ‘Bluecrop’, ‘Bluejay’ and ‘Spartan’ cultivars. Magnesium concentration in leaves was low and optimal only for ‘Bluecrop’ and ‘Spartan’ cultivars. Generally, the assessment of Ca content performed at this date showed a low level of it in the leaves, only the ‘Darrow’ and ‘Northland’ cultivars had the optimal content of this nutrient.

References

  1. Bal J.J.M., 1997. Blueberry culture in greenhouses, tunnels, and under raincovers. Acta Hort. 446, 327–331. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.446.48 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.446.48
  2. Clark J.R., Maples R., 1990. Leaf elemental concentration of highbush blueberry cultivars grown on a mineral soil. Fruit Var. J. 44, 2, 89–92.
  3. Chuntanaparb N., Cummings G., 1980. Seasonal trends in concentration of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, and magnesium in leaf portions of apple, blueberry, grape, and peach. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 105(6), 933–935. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.105.6.933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.105.6.933
  4. Domagała-Świątkiewicz I., Kolarski K., 2007. Wpływ terminu pobierania próbek do analiz na zawartość składników pokarmowych w liściach czterech odmian borówki wysokiej (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). Rocz. Akad. Rol. Pozn., Ogrodn. 383, 41, 297–302.
  5. Eaton G.W., Meehan C.N., 1971. Effects of leaf position and sampling date on leaf nutrient compo-sition of eleven highbush blueberry cultivars. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 96(3), 378–380. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.96.3.378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.96.3.378
  6. Eck P., 1988. Blueberry science. Rutgers University Press, Brunswick, NJ.
  7. Glonek J., Komosa A., 2006. The effect of fertigation on the nutrient status and yield of highbush blueberry cv. ‘Bluecrop’. Acta Hort. 715, 371–374. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic. 2006.715.55 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.715.55
  8. Glonek J., Komosa A., 2013. Fertigation of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). Part III. The effect on nutrient contents in leaves. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 12(3), 69–78.
  9. Gough R.E., 1994. The highbush blueberry and its management. Food Products Press, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482298000
  10. Hanson E.J., Hancock J.F., 1996. Managing highbush blueberry nutrition. MSUE Bull. E-2011, 1–13.
  11. Hart J., Strik B., White L., Yang W.Q., 2006. Nutrient management for blueberries in Oregon. Oregon State University. Ext. Serv. Publ. Em 8918.
  12. Jiang Y., Li Y., Zeng Q., Wei J., Yu H., 2017. The effect of soil pH on plant growth, leaf chloro-phyll fluorescence and mineral element content of two blueberries. Acta Hortic. 2017, 1180, 269–276. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1180.36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1180.36
  13. Komosa A., 2014. Modern nutrition of highbush blueberry. In: Atlas of Diseases and Pests of high-Bush Blueberry, Plantpress sp. z o.o., Kraków, pp. 7–15.
  14. Komosa A., 2012. Theoretical basis of plant nutrition. In: Nutrition of Horticultural Plants. Basics and Perspectives, PWRiL Oddział: Poznań, Polska.
  15. Koszański Z., Rumasz-Rudnicka E., Friedrich S., 2008. Anatomy, morphology and yield of high-bush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) under the influence of irrigation and mineral ferti-lisation. Acta Agrophys. 11(3), 677–684.
  16. Ochmian I., Kozos K., 2014. Influence of foliar fertilisation with calcium fertilisers on the firmness and chemical composition of two highbush blueberry cultivars. J. Elem. 185–201. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2014.19.4.782 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2014.19.4.782
  17. Ostrowska A., Gawliński S., Szczubiałka Z., 1991. Metody analizy i oceny właściwości gleb i roślin. Instytut Ochrony Środowiska, Warszawa.
  18. Pliszka K., Ścibisz K., Rojek H., 1992. Wpływ uprawy gleby i nawożenia na wzrost i plonowanie borówki wysokiej (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). Prace Inst. Sadow. Kwiac., C 3–4, 42–45.
  19. Retamales J.B., Hancock J.F., 2012. Blueberries. Crop Production Science in Horticulture Series 21, CABI, Wallingford, CT, USA, 2012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845939045.0000
  20. Sadowski A., Nurzyński J., Pacholak E., Smolarz K., 1990. Określenie potrzeb nawożenia roślin sadowniczych. II. Zasady, liczby graniczne i dawki nawożenia. Instrukcja Upowszechnieniowa nr 3. SGGW, Warszawa, 25.
  21. Smolarz K., 2009. Borówka i żurawina – zasady racjonalnej produkcji. Wyd. Hortpress.
  22. Spiers J.M., 1982. Seasonal variation of leaf nutrient composition in ‘Tifblue’ rabbiteye blueberry. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 107(2), 255–257. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.107.2.255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.107.2.255
  23. Strik B.C., Vance A.J., 2015. Seasonal variation in leaf nutrient concentration of northern highbush blueberry cultivars grown in conventional and organic production systems. HortSci. 50(10), 1453–1466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.50.10.1453
  24. Townsend L.R., 1972. Effect of N, P, K, and Mg on the growth and productivity of the highbush blueberry. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 53, 161–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps73-029
  25. von Tucher S., Hörndl D., Schmidhalter U., 2018. Interaction of soil pH and phosphorus efficacy: Long-term effects of P fertilizer and lime applications on wheat, barley, and sugar beet. Ambio 2018, 47, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0970-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0970-2
  26. Wach D., 2014. Wpływ dokarmiania pozakorzeniowego nawozem Busz-1 na plonowanie i zawartość wybranych makroskładników w liściach borówki wysokiej (Vaccinium corymbo-sum L.) odmiany ‘Bluecrop’. Ann. Hortic. 24(4), 13–24.
  27. Wach D., Błażewicz-Woźniak M., 2012. Effect of foliar fertilization on yielding and leaf mineral composition of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cul-tus 11(1), 205–214.
  28. Wach D., Gawroński J., Dyduch-Siemińska M., Kaczmarska E., Błażewicz-Woźniak M., 2016. Phenotypic and genotypic variability of cultivars of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbo-sum L.) grown in the Lublin region. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 15(6), 305–319.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.