Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
Agronomy Science Baner text

Tom 79 Nr 4 (2024)

Artykuły

Changes in segetal flora in a selected habitat of southern Poland from 1993 to 2022. Part 1. Species richness and biodiversity

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2024.5422
Przesłane: 28 sierpnia 2024
Opublikowane: 18.03.2025

Abstrakt

The research aimed to assess changes in segetal flora richness and biodiversity in cereal crops in a selected habitat (Małopolska voivodship; southern Poland) from 1993 to 2022. The research material consisted of 65 phytosociological relevés representing selected years of the analyzed multiannual period. The total species richness and the average number of segetal species on individual fields slightly decreased. In the first year of the study (1993), the total number of species was 56, and the average number of species in the phytosociological relevé was 23. However, in the last year (2022), the total number of species was 55, while their average number was around 20. The proportion of monocotyledonous weeds in the total weed infestation constantly increased, from 10% in 1993 to 23% in 2022. The studied flora was dominated by short-lived species (especially therophytes) throughout the entire multiannual period. The Shannon-Wiener diversity index remained at a relatively similar level for many years – in 1993 it was 0.8, and in 2022 – it was 0.9, which generally indicates a constant diversity of the studied flora of fields. The Simpson dominance index showed a decreasing trend; in the first year of the study it was 0.4, and in the last year – less than 0.3.

Bibliografia

  1. Baessler C., Klotz S., 2006. Effects of changes in agricultural land-use on landscape structure and arable weed vegetation over the last 50 years. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 115(1–4), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.12.007
  2. Bretagnolle V., Gaba S., 2015. Weeds for bees? A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 35, 891–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0302-5
  3. Bomanowska A., 2006. Wybrane cechy flory segetalnej Kampinoskiego Parku Narodowego [Some features of the segetal flora of the Kampinos National Park]. Pam. Puł. 143, 27–35.
  4. Braun-Blanquet J., 1964. Pflanzensoziologie [Phytosociology]. Springer, Berlin–Wien–New York, pp. 631.
  5. Dąbkowska T., Grabowska-Orządała M., Łabza T., 2017. The study of the transformation of segetal flora richness and diversity in selected habitats of southern Poland over a 20-year interval. Acta Agrobot. 70(2), 1712. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.1712
  6. Dąbkowska T., Łabza T., 2010. Gatunki z rodziny Poaceae w uprawach zbóż na wybranych siedli-skach Polski południowej w ostatnich 25 latach (1981–2006) [Species from Poaceae family in cereals in selected habitats of southern Poland over the last 25 years (1981–2006)]. Fragm. Agron. 27(2), 47–59.
  7. Dąbkowska T., Łabza T., Krańska A., 2007. Zmiany we florze chwastów segetalnych w latach 1993–2005 zagrożonych na rędzinie brunatnej Wyżyny Miechowskiej [Changes of segetal we-ed flora in the years 1993–2005 threatened on brown rendzina of Małopolska Upland]. Fragm. Agron. 24(3), 55–61.
  8. Dąbkowska T., Sygulska P., 2013. Variations in weed flora and the degree of its transformation in ecological and extensive conventional cereal crops in selected habitats of the Beskid Wyspowy Mountains. Acta Agrobot. 66(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2013.029
  9. Dostatny D.F., 2006. Zagrożenia różnorodności w zespole Caucalido-Scandicetum [Threats to diversity of the Caucalido-Scandicetum association]. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. 517, 267–276.
  10. Fanfarillo E., Latini M., Iberite M., Abbate G., 2020. The segetal flora of Italy: an occurrence dataset from relevés in winter cereals and allied crop type. PhytoKeys 161, 107–118. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.161.53915
  11. Falińska K., 2004. Ekologia roślin [Plant ecology]. PWN, Warszawa, pp. 512.
  12. Feledyn-Szewczyk B., Smagacz J., Kwiatkowski C.A., Harasim C., Woźniak A., 2020. Weed flora and soil seed bank composition as affected by tillage system in three-year crop rotation. Agri-culture 10, 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture1005018
  13. Glemnitz M., Czimber G., Radics L., Hoffmann J., 2000. Weed flora composition along a north-south climate gradient in Europe. Acta Agron. Óvár. 42(2), 155–169.
  14. Kapeluszny J., Haliniarz M., 2010. Ekspansywne i zagrożone gatunki flory segetalnej w środkowo-wschodniej Polsce [Expansive and threatened segetal flora species in middle-eastern Poland]. Annales UMCS, sec. E 65(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10081-010-0004-2.
  15. Kondracki J., 2009. Geografia regionalna Polski [Regional geography of Poland]. PWN, Warszawa, pp. 444.
  16. Marshall E.J.P., Brown V.K., Boatman N.D., Lutman P.J., Squire G.R., Ward L.K., 2003. The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields. Weed Res. 43(2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2003.00326.x
  17. Meyer S., Wesche K., Krause B., Leuschner C., 2013. Dramatic losses of specialist arable plants in central Germany since the 1950/1960s – a cross-regional analysis. Divers. Distrib. 19, 1175–1187. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12102
  18. Mirek Z., Piękoś-Mirkowa H., Zając A., Zając M., 2020. Vascular plants of Poland: an annotated checklist. Instytut Botaniki PAN, Kraków, pp. 526.
  19. Pawłowski F., 1972. Skład i budowa zbiorowisk roślinnych oraz metody ich badania [Composition and structure of plant communities and methods of their study]. W: W. Szafer, K. Zarzycki (eds.), Szata roślinna Polski [Plant cover of Poland]. PWN, Warszawa, 237–269.
  20. Richner N., Holderegger R., Linder H.P., Walter T., 2015. Reviewing change in the arable fora of Europe: a meta-analysis. Weed Res. 55(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12123
  21. Rzymowska Z., 2013. Współczesne zmiany we florze i zbiorowiskach segetalnych Podlaskiego Przełomu Bugu [Recent changes in the flora and segetal communities of the Podlaski Przełom Bugu Mesoregion (Podlasie Bug Gorge)]. Wyd. Naukowe UPH, Siedlce, pp. 125.
  22. Shannon C.E., 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
  23. Simpson E.H., 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature, 168, 668. https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0
  24. Soil-agricultural map at a scale 1:5000 for the village of Goszcza, 1992 [Mapa glebowo-rolnicza w skali 1:5000 dla wsi Goszcza]. Available online https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html?SRS=2180&resources=map:wms@https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/wss/service/pub/guest/MapaGlebowoRolnicza/MapServer/WMSServer [accessed on 21.10.2024].
  25. Skrajna T., 2021. Zmiany we florze segetalnej Wysoczyzny Kałuszyńskiej w okresie 25 lat [Changes in the segetal flora of the Kałuszyn Upland over a 25-year period]. Wyd. Naukowe UPH, Sie-dlce, pp. 144.
  26. Stawicka J., Szymczak-Piątek M., Wieczorek J., 2004. Wybrane zagadnienia ekologiczne [Selected ecological issues]. SGGW, Warszawa, 173–202.
  27. Storkey J., Meyer S., Still K.S., Leuschner C., 2012. The impact of agricultural intensification and land-use change on the European arable flora. Proc. R. Soc. B. 279, 1421–1429. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1686
  28. Trzcińska-Tacik H., 2003. Znaczenie różnorodności gatunkowej chwastów segetalnych [The impor-tance of species diversity of segetal weeds]. Pam. Puł. 134, 253–262.
  29. Tyšer L., Hamouz P., Nováková K., Nečasová M., Holec J., 2009. Changes in weed communities on selected areas with 30 years’ interval. Sci. Agric. Bohem. 40(1), 18–25.
  30. Zarzycki K., Trzcińska-Tacik H., Różański W., Szeląg Z., Wołek J., Korzeniak U. 2002. Ekologiczne liczby wskaźnikowe roślin naczyniowych Polski [Ecological indicator values of vascular plants of Poland]. Instytut Botaniki PAN, Kraków, pp. 183.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.