Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Agronomy Science Baner text

Vol. 79 No. 3 (2024)

Articles

Carbon farming practices. A review

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2024.5347
Submitted: February 26, 2024
Published: 13.01.2025

Abstract

Dynamically progressing climate changes and the need to ensure food security for a growing population prompt us to take intensive actions to reduce emissions and increase sequestration of CO2. New opportunities are seen in the implementation of carbon farming practices. The aim of the study was to present activities recommended within carbon farming that contribute to soil fertility and increased sequestration of organic carbon in the soil. The source of information were legal acts, reports and documents of international institutions and literature on the subject. It was indicated that carbon farming practices provide benefits in terms of productivity, environmental protection (biodiversity), water retention and stability in the soil, limiting soil erosion, and have a positive impact on the functioning of entire agroecosystems, thus increasing the resilience of agriculture to climate change. Implementing carbon farming practices can also provide an additional source of income for farmers through the sale of carbon credits.

References

  1. Bolinder M.A., Crotty F., Elsen A., Frac M., Kismányoky T., Lipiec J., Tits M., Tóth Z., Kätterer T., 2020. The effect of crop residues, cover crops, manures and nitrogen fertilization on soil organ-ic carbon changes in agroecosystems: A synthesis of reviews. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 25, 929–952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-020-09916-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-020-09916-3
  2. Borek R., Zajączkowski J., Wójcik M., Malusa E., Tartanus M., Furmańczyk E., Jędrejek A., Kozy-ra J., Kozak M., 2022. Agroleśnictwo (systemy rolno-leśne). Poradnik dla rolników i doradców rolnych. IUNG-PIB, Puławy, ss. 80.
  3. Burgess P.J., Rosati A., 2018. Advances in European agroforestry: results from the AGFOR-WARD project. Agrofor. Syst. 92, 801–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0261-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0261-3
  4. Core Writing Team, Lee H., Romero J. (eds.), 2023. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Con-tribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovern-mental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 184 pp. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
  5. Czyż E., Dexter A.R., Gajda A., 2010. Wpływ uproszczonej uprawy roli na właściwości fizyczne i mikrobiologiczne wybranych gleb. Zesz. Nauk. Połud.-Wschod. Oddz. PTIE i PTG, Rzeszów 13, 33–35.
  6. Drexler S., Gensior A., Don A., 2021. Carbon sequestration in hedgerow biomass and soil in the temperate climate zone. Reg. Environ. Change 21(3), 74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01798-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01798-8
  7. European Commission, 2014. Commission Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 of 25 June 2014 declar-ing certain categories of aid in the agricultural and forestry sectors and in rural areas compatible with the internal market in application of Article 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. O.J. EU, L193/1, 01.07.2014.
  8. European Commission, 2019. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A European Green Deal. Brussels, COM(2019) 640 final.
  9. European Commission, 2021. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Sustainable Carbon Cycles. Brussels, COM(2021) 800 final.
  10. Faber A., Jarosz Z., 2018. Modelowanie bilansu węgla organicznego w glebie oraz emisji gazów cieplarnianych w skali regionalnej oraz w Polsce. Probl. Rol. Światowego 3, 102–112. https://doi.org/10.22630/PRS.2018.18.3.70 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22630/PRS.2018.18.3.70
  11. Frelih-Larsen A., Bowyer C., Albrecht S., Keenleyside C., Kemper M., Nanni S., Naumann S., Mottershead D., Landgrebe R., Andersen E., Banfi P., Bell S., Bremere I., Cools J., Herbert S., Iles A., Kampa E., Kettunen M., Lukacova Z., Moreira G., Kiresiewa Z., Rouillard J., Okx J., Pantzar M., Paquel K., Pederson R., Peepson A., Pelsy F., Petrovic D., Psaila E., Šarapatka B., Sobocka J., Stan A. C., Tarpey J., Vidaurre R., 2016. Updated inventory and assessment of soil protection policy instruments in EU Member States. Final Report to DG Environment, Ber-lin: Ecologic Institute.
  12. Frolking S., Talbot J., Jones M.C., Treat C.C., Kauffman J.B., Tuittila E.S., Roulet N., 2011. Peat-lands in the Earth’s 21st century climate system. Environ. Rev. 19, 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1139/a11-014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/a11-014
  13. Gajda A.M., 2015. Mikrobiologiczne i biochemiczne wskaźniki jakości gleb pod pszenicą ozimą w zależności od system uprawy roli. Mon. Rozpr. Nauk. IUNG-PIB 46, 145.
  14. Greifswald Mire Centre, National University of Ireland (Galway) and Wetlands International Europe Association, 2019. Peatlands in the EU – Common Agriculture Policy (CAP): After 2020. https://www.greifswaldmoor.de/files/dokumente/Infopapiere_Briefings/202003_CAP%20
  15. Policy%20Brief%20Peatlands%20in%20the%20new%20EU%20Version%204.8.pdf [dostęp: 19.10.2023].
  16. Günther A., Barthelmes A., Huth V., Joosten H., Jurasiński G., Koebsch F., Couwenberg J., 2020. Prompt rewetting of drained peatlands reduces climate warming despite methane emissions. Nat. Commun. 11, 1644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15499-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15499-z
  17. Holka M., Bieńkowski J., 2020. Ocena emisji gazów cieplarnianych w cyklu życia produkcji pszeni-cy ozimej w różnych systemach uprawy roli. Agron. Sci. 73(3), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2020.3.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2020.3.5
  18. Hristov A.N., Melgar A., Wasson D., Arndt C., 2022. Symposium review: Effective nutritional strategies to mitigate enteric methane in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 105(10), 8543–8557. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-21398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-21398
  19. Humpenöder F., Karstens K., Lotze-Campen H., Leifeld J., Menichetti L., Barthelmes A., Popp A., 2020. Peatland protection and restoration are key for climate change mitigation. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 104093. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abae2a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abae2a
  20. Jarosz Z., Faber A., 2022. Regionalne zróżnicowanie i projekcja emisji amoniaku z gospodarowania nawozami naturalnymi. St. Rap. IUNG-PIB, 67(21), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.26114/sir.iung.2022.67.10
  21. Joosten H., Brust K., Couwenberg J., Gerner A., Holsten B., Permien T., Schäfer A., Tanneberger F., Trepel M., Wahren A., 2015. MoorFutures: Integration of additional ecosystem services (including biodiversity): into carbon credits – standard, methodology and transferability to other regions. BfN-Skripten 407. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, 119 pp.
  22. Joosten H., Tapio-Bistrom M.L., Tol S., 2012. Peatlands – guidance for climate changes mitigation through conservation, rehabilitation and sustainable use. Mitigation of Climate in Agriculture, Series 5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Wetlands International. http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/an762e/an762e.pdf [dostęp: 19.10.2023].
  23. Kay S., Rega C., Moreno G., den Herder M., Palma J., Borek R., Crous-Duran J., Freese D., Gian-nitsopoulos M., Graves A., Jäger M., Lamersdorf N., Memedemin D., Mosquera-Losada R., Pantera A., Paracchini M.L., Paris P., Roces-Díaz J.V., Rolo V., Rosati A., Sandor M., Smith J., Szerencsits E., Varga A., Viaud V., Wawer R., Burgess P.J., Herzog F., 2019. Agroforestry Creates Carbon Sinks Whilst Enhancing the Environment in Agricultural Landscapes in Eu-rope. Land Use Policy 83, 581–593, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.025
  24. KOBiZE, 2023. Krajowy raport inwentaryzacyjny 2023. Inwentaryzacja emisji i pochłaniania gazów cieplarnianych w Polsce dla lat 1988-2021. Raport syntetyczny. Instytut Ochrony Środowiska – PIB, Warszawa.
  25. Körschens M., Rogasik J., Schulz E., Böning H., Eich D., Ellerbrock R.H., Franko U., Hülsbergen K.J., Köppen D., Kolbe H., Leithold G., Merbach I., Peschke H., Prystav W., Reinhold J., Zimmer J., 2004. Humusbilanzierung: Methode zur Beurteilung und Bemessung der Hu-musversorgung von Ackerland: Standpunkt / VDLUFA. Verband Deutscher Landwirtschaft-licher Untersuchungs- und Forschungsanstalten, Darmstadt. https://www.openagrar.de/receive/timport_mods_00002261 [dostęp: 03.06.2024].
  26. Kotowski W., 2021. Oszacowanie emisji gazów cieplarnianych z użytkowania gleb organicznych w Polsce oraz potencjału ich redukcji. Fundacja WWF Polska, 20.
  27. Kotowski W., Jabłońska E., Kozub Ł., Jaszczuk I., Panek P., 2019. Mokradła a zmiany klimatu. Materiały dla mediów – Światowy Dzień Mokradeł 2019. https://bagna.pl/images/WWD/ WWD_2019_press_pack_final.pdf [dostęp: 19.10.2023].
  28. Kwiatkowski C.A., Harasim E., Pawłowski L., 2020. Can catch crops be an important factor in carbon dioxide sequestration? Int. J. Conserv. Sci. 11, 1005–1018. http://ijcs.ro/public/IJCS-20-74_Kwiatkowski.pdf [dostęp: 03.06.2024].
  29. Luo Z., Wang E., Sun O.J., 2010. Can no-tillage stimulate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils? A meta-analysis of paired experiments. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 139(1), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.08.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.08.006
  30. Nichols J.E., Peteet D.M., 2019. Rapid expansion of northern peatlands and doubled estimate of carbon storage. Nat. Geosci. 12(11), 917–921. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0454-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0454-z
  31. Oleś I., 2021. Uprawa międzyplonów korzyścią dla rolnika i środowiska. Kujawsko-Pomorski Ośrodek Doradztwa Rolniczego w Minikowie, 28.
  32. Pieszka M., Krawczyk W., Jadczyszyn T., Jarosz Z., Dziubanek G., Domagalska J., Rusin M., 2022. Gospodarka nawozowa a ochrona wód. FDPA, Warszawa, 93.
  33. Pikuła D., 2019. Praktyki zapobiegające stratom węgla organicznego z gleby. St. Rap. IUNG-PIB 59(13), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.26114/sir.iung.2019.59.06
  34. Pikuła D., 2022. Znaczenie materii organicznej w ograniczaniu strat biogenów. St. Rap. IUNG-PIB 69(23), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.26114/sir.iung.2022.69.08
  35. Pražan J., Nanni S., Redman M., Vedrenne M., Martin I., Panarin M., Allen B., Gerritsen E., Milli-ard P., Menadue H., Brenner V., Bresson C., Lórànt A., Daydé Ch., Bowyer C., Coulon A., Mottershead D., Karoglan Todorovic S., Keenleyside C., Maréchal A., Frelih-Larsen A., To-ma I., Ittner S., Wiltshire J., Znaor D., Martineau H., Zemeckis R., 2019. Evaluation study of the impact of the CAP on climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. Final Report. Publica-tion Office of the European Union. Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2762/54044
  36. Prusiński J., Kotecki A., 2006. Współczesne problemy produkcji roślin motylkowatych. Fragm. Agron. 3(91), 94–126.
  37. Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, 2018. Global Wetland Outlook: State of the World’s Wetlands and their Services to People. Gland, Switzerland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat. https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/flipbooks/ramsar_gwo_english_web.pdf [dostęp: 19.10.2023].
  38. Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 estab-lishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (European Climate Law). O.J. EU, L 243/1, 09.07.2021.
  39. Renou-Wilson F., Moser G., Fallon D., Farrell C.A., Müller C., Wilson D., 2019. Rewetting de-graded peatlands for climate and biodiversity benefits: Results from two raised bogs. Ecol. Eng. 127, 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.02.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.02.014
  40. Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 31 stycznia 2023 r. w sprawie „Programu działań mających na celu zmniejszenie zanieczyszczenia wód azotanami pochodzącymi ze źródeł rolniczych oraz zapobieganie dalszemu zanieczyszczeniu” (Dz. U. z 2023 r., poz. 244. Z 07.02.2023).
  41. Smagacz J., 2018. Konserwująca uprawa roli – tendencje rozwoju i znaczenie we współczesnym rolnictwie. Mon. Rozpr. Nauk. IUNG-PIB 59, 126.
  42. Sikander K.T., Lu X., Shah Shamim-Ul-Sibtain, Hussain I., Sohail M., 2019. Soil Carbon Seques-tration through Agronomic Management Practices. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.87107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.87107
  43. Tiefenbacher A., Sandén T., Haslmayr H.P., Miloczki J., Wenzel W., Spiegel H., 2021. Optimizing carbon sequestration in croplands: A synthesis. Agronomy 11, 882, https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050882 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050882
  44. Wichtmann W., Schröder C., Joosten H. (eds.), 2016. Paludiculture-productive use of wet peatlands. Climate protection – biodiversity – regional economic benefits. Schweizerbart Science Publish-ers, 272.
  45. World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF), 2023. https://www.worldagroforestry.org [dostęp: 19.10.2023].
  46. Yu Z., Joss F., Bauska T.K., Stocker B.D., Fischer H., Loisel J., Brovkin V., Hugelius G., Nehr-bass-Ahles C., Kleinen T., Schmitt J., 2021. No support for carbon storage of >1,000 GtC in northern peatlands. Nat. Geosci.14, 470–472. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00769-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00769-2

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.