Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
ASPHC Baner

Vol. 18 No. 1 (2019)

Articles

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT CROP ROTATIONS ON WEED INFESTATION AND YIELD OF SILAGE MAIZE (Zea mays L.) AND MUSKMELON (Cucumis melo L.) IN ORGANIC CULTIVATION

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2019.1.3
Submitted: February 19, 2019
Published: 19.02.2019

Abstract

In our study, we investigated how crop rotation of a spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.), broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica), vetch (Vicia sativa L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) mixture and faba bean (Vicia faba L.) with maize (Zea mays L.) and muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) products affected the weed density and coverage area in organic crop production. The weed coverage areas and densities (weeds m–2) of summer crops produced in rotation with winter crops were compared with those of control plots in the experimental area. As a result of this comparison, the most effective winter crops for reducing weed density in silage maize were found to be broccoli (50.4%), barley + vetch (48.3%) and faba bean (45.3%). When the effect of winter crops on weeds in terms of muskmelon production was examined, barley + vetch (53.2%), broccoli (36.1%) and faba bean (33.4%) were found to reduce the density of weeds. In contrast, the application of barley + vetch (67.0%), faba bean (65.3) and broccoli (62.0%) was the most effective applications for the muskmelon product in terms of weed coverage area; spinach (24.7%) and constantly weedless (16.8%) applications were less effective. When the silage maize and muskmelon yield results were examined, it was determined that yield differences were statistically significant. It was also determined that the highest yield was obtained from the barley + vetch rotations. This application effectiveness was followed by that of the faba bean, constantly weedless, broccoli and spinach applications.

Novelty statement. Recently, non-chemical applications have been considered for weed control due to growing concerns about herbicide resistance and chemical residues in the environment. Moreover, organic crop systems are gradually developing. One of the options for weed control in organic farming is crop rotation. In this study, we found that crop rotations controlled weeds effectively in organic farming.

References

  1. Akobundu. I.O. (1987). Weed science in the tropics: principles and practices. Wiley, Chichester, 522 pp.
  2. Aksoy, E., Arslan, Z. F., Tetik, O., Eymirli, S. (2016). Using the possibilities of some trap, catch and Brassicaceaen crops for controlling crenate broomrape a problem in lentil fields. Int. J. Plant Prod., 10(1), 53–62.
  3. Anderson, R.L. (2010). A rotation design to reduce weed density in organic farming. Renew. Agric. Food Syst., 25(3), 189–195.
  4. Bajgai, Y., Kristiansen, P., Hulugalle, N., McHenry, M. (2013). Comparison of organic and conventional managements on yields, nutrients and weeds in a corn cabbage rotation. Renew. Agric. Food Syst., 30, 132–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1742170513000264 [date of access: 12.09.2017].
  5. Bilen, E., Nazik, C.A., Unal, M., Bteich, M.R., Bitar, A.L., Aksoy, U. (2012). Economic performance of pre-crops in a three-year rotation program for organic vegetable production. Acta Hortic., 933, 321–327.
  6. Blackshaw, R.E. (1994). Rotation affects downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol., 8, 728–732.
  7. Daugovish, O., Lyon, D.J., Baltensperger. D.D. (1999). Cropping systems to control winter annual grasses in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol., 13, 120–126.
  8. Finney, D.M., Creamer, N.G., Schultheis, J.R., Wagger, M.G., Brownie, C. (2009). Sorghum sudangrass as a summer cover and hay crop for organic fall cabbage production. Renew. Agric. Food Syst., 24, 225–233.
  9. Gonzalez-Díaz, L., Van Den Berg, F., Van Den Bosch, F., González-Andújar, J.L., Arévalo, J.R., Fernández, S., López, F., Recasens., J., Sobrino, E. (2011). Crop rotation synchronization at landscape level as a weed management strategy in cereals. Plantas invasoras resistencias a herbicidas y detección de malas hierbas. XIII Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Malherbología, November 2011, La Laguna, 22–24.
  10. Gresta, F., Santonocetoa, C., Avola, G. (2016). Crop rotation as an effective strategy for saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Sci. Hortic., 211, 34–39.
  11. Gruber, S., Wahl, E., Zikeli, S., Claupein, W. (2012). Perspectives and limitations of weed control in organic lentils (Lens culinaris). J. Kul.pflanzen, 64(10), 365–377.
  12. HRAC (2018). International survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Available: http://weedscience.org/Details/Case. aspx?ResistID=5099 [date of accses: 17.05.2018].
  13. Jernigan, A.B., Caldwell, B.A., Cordeau S., DiTommaso, A. (2017). Weed abundance and community composition following a long-term organic vegetable cropping systems experiment. Weed Sci., 65, 639–649. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2017.33 [date of access: 12.05.2018].
  14. Jensen, E.S., Peoples, M.B., Nielsen, H.H. (2010). Faba bean in cropping systems. Field Crops Res., 115, 203–216.
  15. Kaçan, K., Boz, Ö. (2014). Investigation of alternative weed management methods in organic vineyards of the Aegean region. Turk. J. Agric. Nat. Sci., Special Issue, 2, 1369–1373.
  16. Kapoulas, N., Ilić, Z.S., Đurovka, M., Trajković, Z., Milenković, L. (2011). Effect of organic and conventional production practices on nutritional value and antioxidant activity of tomatoes. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 10(71), 15938–15945.
  17. Khawar, J., Mahajan, G., Sardana, V., Chauhan, B.S. (2015). Allelopathy for weed control in agricultural systems. Crop Prot., 72, 57–65.
  18. Kortekamp, A. (2011). Herbicides and Environment. InTech, Rijeka. Available: https://library.umac.mo/ebooks/ b28109740.pdf. [date of access: 10.10.2017].
  19. Langenkämper, G., Zörb, C., Seifert, M., Mäder, P., Fretzdorff, B., Betsche, T. (2006). Nutritional quality of organic and conventional wheat. J. Appl. Bot. Food Quality, 80, 150–154.
  20. Lapinsh, D., Korolova, M., Berzinsh, A. (2008). Crop rotation influence on the weed incidence in cereals. Zemdirbyste (Agriculture), 95(3), 433–439.
  21. Lovett, J.V., Hoult, H.C. (1995). Allelopathy and self-defense in barley. In: Allelopathy: organisms, processes and applications, Inderjit, K.M.M., Dakshini, Einhellig, F.A. (eds.). ACS Symposium Series 582, 170-183. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.
  22. Madsen, H., Talgrea, L., Eremeeva, V., Alarua, M., Kauera, K., Luikb, A. (2016). Do green manures as winter cover crops impact the weediness and crop yield in an organic crop rotation? Biol. Agric. Hortic., 32(3), 182–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2016.1138141 [date of access: 12.05.2018].
  23. Oerke, E.C., Weber, A., Dehne, H.W., Schönbeck, F. (1994). Conclusions and perspectives. In: Crop production and crop protection. Estimated losses in major food and cash crops, Oerke, E.C., Dehne, H.W., Schönbeck, F., Weber, A. (eds.). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 742–770.
  24. Oerke, E.C., Dehne, H.W. (2004). Safeguarding production losses in major crops and the role of crop protection. Crop Prot., 23, 275–285.
  25. Peruzzi, A., Ginanni, M., Raffaelli, M., Borelli., M. (2004). Physical weed control in organic spinach production. Proceedings of the 6th EWRS Workshop on Physical and Cultural Weed Control 8–10 March 2004, Lillehammer, Norway, 5–25.
  26. Peruzzi, A., Ginanni, M., Fontanelli, M., Raffaelli, M., Barberi, P. (2007). Innovative strategies for on-farm weed management in organic carrot. Renew. Agric. Food Syst., 22(4), 246–259.
  27. Petr, J., Kodeš, A., Stehlíková, K., Hubert, D., Svobodová, P. (2004). Feeding quality of wheat from conventional and ecological farming. Sci. Agric. Boh., 35(2), 74–78.
  28. Randrianjafizanaka, M.T., Autfrayb, P., Andrianaivoc, A.P., Ramontaa, I.R., Rodenburg, J. (2018). Combined effects of cover crops, mulch, zero-tillage and resistant varietieson Striga asiatica (L.) Kuntze in rice-maize rotation systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 256, 23–33.
  29. Reddiex, S.J., Wratten, S.D., Hill, G.D., Bourdot, G.W., Frampton, C.M. (2001). Evaluation of mechanical weed management techniques on weed and crop populations. New Zeal. Plant Prot., 54, 174–178
  30. Reddy, K.N., Locke, M.A., Koger, C.H., Zablotowicz, R.M., Krutz, L.J. (2006). Cotton and corn rotation under reduced tillage management: impacts on soil properties, weed control, yield, and net return. Weed Sci., 54(4), 768–774.
  31. Roberts, H.A. (1981). Seed banks in soils. Adv. Appl. Biol., 6, 1–55.
  32. Shahzad, M., Farooq, M., Khawar, J., Mubsbar, H. (2016). Impact of different crop rotations and tillage systems on weed infestation and productivity of bread wheat. Crop Prot., 89, 161–169.
  33. Schoofs, A., Entz, M.H., van Acker, R.C., Martens, J.R.T., Derksen, D.A. (2005). Agronomic performance of pesticide free production under two crop rotations. Renew. Agric. Food Syst., 20(2), 91–100.
  34. Simić, M., Spasojević, I., Kovacević, D., Brankov, M. Dragicević, V. (2016). Crop rotation influence on annual and perennial weed control and maize productivity. Rom. Agric. Res., 33, 125–132.
  35. Song, Y.N, Zhang, F.S., Marschner, P., Fan, F.L., Gao, H.M., Bao, X.G., Sun, J.H., Li, L. (2007). Effect of intercropping on crop yield and chemical and microbiological properties in rhizosphere of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), maize (Zea mays L.), and faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Biol. Fertil. Soils, 43(5), 565–574.
  36. Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H., Dickey, D.A. (1997). Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach. Third ed. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York.
  37. Schweizer, E.E., Zimdahl, R.L. (1984). Weed seed decline in irrigated soil after rotation of crops and herbicides. Weed Sci., 32, 84–89.
  38. Tepe, I. (1998). The problems and challenges weeds agriculture and non-agricultural areas in Turkey. Yüzüncü Yıl University Publications No. 32, 237 p. Van.
  39. TURKMETSER (2016). Turkish State Meteorological Service, Menemen Regional Meteorological Station, Menemen, Izmir.
  40. USDA (2018). United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Introduced, invasive, and noxious plants, Introduced Plants of the Plants Floristic Area. Available: https://plants.usda.gov/ java/introduced?startChar=A [date of access:17.05.2018].
  41. Uygur, F.N., Lanini, W.T. (2006). Weed control methods and side effects in organic agriculture. Turkey 3rd Organic Agriculture Symposium 1–4 November 2006, Yalova. Program and abstracts, 173–184.
  42. Weaver, S.E., McWilliams, E.L. (1980). The biology of Canadian weeds Amaranthus retroflexus L., A. powellii S. Wats. and A. hybridus L. Can. J. Plant Sci., 60, 1215–1234.
  43. Yıldız, M., Gürkan, O., Turgut, C., Kaya, Ü., Ünal, G. (2005). Environmental problems caused by pesticides used in agriculture. Turkey Agricultural Engineering Technical Congress, Chamber of Agriculture, Chamber of Engineers, 6, 3–7.
  44. Zeng, R.S., Luo, S.M., Mallik, A.U. (2008). Allelopathy in sustainable agriculture and forestry. Springer, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77337-7.
  45. Zoheir, Y.A., Sadeghi, S., Mashhadi, H.R. (2007). Allelopathic effect of barley (Hordeum vulgare)on germination and growth of wild barley (H. spontaneum). Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res., 13(1–2), 99–112. Available: http://www.cabi.org/gara/FullTextPDF/2008/20083050754.pdf. [date of access: 10.01.2017].

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.