Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin

Losses of total protein and net lactation energy as dependent on preservation technology of forages from mountain grassland

Adam Radkowski



Beata Grygierzec





Abstract

Selection of the preservation method has a great influence on the quality of preserved forages from grassland. First of all it is important to choose the method which assures the smallest losses of nutrients. Fundamentally, there are two methods of preservation: drying, and silage. The aim of the study was to determine the amount of total protein and net lactation energy losses for hay and silage production using different methods. The study were conducted in two mountain farms. Two kinds of drying and silage were taken into account: drying on the area of the meadow with cocking and drying on the rickstands, silage in a temporary silo and in foil bales. In the forages made by using different technologies losses of total protein content fluctuated from 19 to 35% and losses of net location energy from 11 to 28%. Summing up, the lowest level of losses were observed for silage in foil bales. In the mountain area, characterised with high level of atmospheric falls, there are unfavourable conditions for hay production. Hence making silages in foil bales is an alternative for drying hay on the rickstands.



Published
2004-09-09



Adam Radkowski 
Beata Grygierzec 



License

Articles are made available under the conditions CC BY 4.0 (until 2020 under the conditions CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Submission of the paper implies that it has not been published previously, that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

The author signs a statement of the originality of the work, the contribution of individuals, and source of funding.

 

Agronomy Science has adopted a self-archiving policy called blue by the Sherpa Romeo database. From 2021 authors can self-archive article postprints and editorial versions (under the CC BY 4.0 licence). Articles from earlier years (available under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence) can only be self-archived as editorial versions.


Most read articles by the same author(s)