Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 34 No. 2 (2016)

Articles

A comparison of the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in sheep from the indoor and outdoor management system

Submitted: July 11, 2019
Published: 2016-07-27

Abstract

Gastrointestinal parasites are responsible for high economic losses to sheep production. Infected animals show developmental problems, reduced weight and a low quality of meat and wool. This study takes into consideration two different sheep management systems, indoor (n = 50) and outdoor (n = 50) ones, and their impact on the occurrence of gastrointestinal parasites. Coproscopic examinations of sheep were made three times during one season. Flotation, sedimentation and McMaster methods were applied to determine the parasite species, prevalence of infection and mean EPG/OPG of parasites. Sheep from indoor management carried only 3 parasite taxa (Trichostrongylidae spp., Capillaria spp. and oocysts Eimeria spp.) whereas, 4 parasite taxa were derived from individuals kept in the outdoor management system (Trichostrongylidae spp., Nematodirus spp., Trichuris spp., and Moniezia spp). The overall prevalence of G.I. parasites was 3.4-fold higher in sheep from the outdoor management system. Sheep kept outdoors showed significantly higher overall mean EPG/OPG values for all taxa. Results of this study show that sheep kept outdoors are subject to intensive parasite invasions as compared to individuals managed indoors.

References

Alvarez-Rodrigueza J., Joy M., Villalba D., Sanza A., 2008. Growth analysis in light lambs raised under different management systems. Small Rumin. Res. 79, 188–91.

Junkuszew A., Milerski M., Bojar W., Szczepaniak K., Le Scouarnec J., Tomczuk K., Dudko P., Studzińska M.B., Demkowska-Kutrzepa M., Bracik K., 2015. Effect of various antiparasitic treatments on lamb growth and mortality. Small Rumin. Res. 123, 306–13.

Nieuwhof G.J., Bishop S.C., 2005. Costs of the major endemic diseases of sheep in Great Britain and the potential benefits of reduction in disease impact. Anim. Sci. 81, 23–9.

Niżnikowski R., Strzelec E., Popielarczyk D., 2006. Economics and profitability of sheep and goat production under new support regimes and market conditions in Central and Eastern Europe. Small Rumin. Res. 62, 159–65.

Nowosad B., Malczewski A., Skalska M., Fudalewicz-Niemczyk W., Gawor J., 2000. The influence of different management systems on the infection level of some gastrointestinal parasites in southern Poland. Wiad. Parazyt. 46, 245–64.

Pilarczyk B., Balicka-Ramisz A., Ramisz A., Binerowska B., 2008. Comparison of internal parasite invasions in sheep on ecological and conventional farms. Ann. Anim. Sci. 8, 89–93.

Raynaud J.P., 1970. Etude de l’efficacited’une technique de coproscopie quantitative pour le diagnostic de routine et le controle des infestations parasitaires des bovins, ovins, equines et porcins. Ann. Parasitol. 45, 321–42.

Rohlf F.J., Sokal R.R., 1995. Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd ed., W.H. Freeman, New York.

Schnieder T., 2006. Veterinärmedizinische Parasitologie. Parey Verlag, Stuttgart.

Sykes A.R., 1994. Parasitism and production in farm animals. Anim. Prod. 59, 155–72.

Thamsborg S.M., Jørgensen R.J., Waller P.J., Nansen P., 1996. The influence of stocking rate on gastrointestinal nematode infections of sheep over a 2-year grazing period. Vet. Parasitol. 67, 207–24.

Tomczuk K., Kostro K., Szczepaniak K.O., Grzybek M., Studzińska M., Demkowska-Kutrzepa M., Roczeń-Karczmarz M., 2014. Comparison of the sensitivity of coprological methods in detecting Anoplocephala perfoliata invasions. Parasitol Res. 113, 2401–6.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.