Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
ASPHC Baner

Vol. 22 No. 4 (2023)

Articles

Effects of different irrigation levels and varying doses of silicon applications on yield and some physiological parameters in lettuce cultivation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2023.5004
Submitted: November 9, 2022
Published: 31.08.2023

Abstract

The study was repeated for two years to reduce the effects of water scarcity and drought stress in lettuce cultivation. The irrigation problem was created by applying 25% (I25), 50% (I50), 75% (I75) and 100% (I100) of the evaporation amounts formed in the class-A evaporation vessel. Si0 (0 kg ha–1), Si40 (40 kg ha–1), Si80 (80 kg ha–1) and Si120 (120 kg ha–1) silicon fertilisation was applied at four different doses. Head length, head diameter, head weight, root length, and leaf fresh and dry weight were measured in harvested plants. According to the data of 2020–2021, the best results in the effect of different doses of Si applications on plant head height, head diameter, head weight and root length at different irrigation levels were recorded from I75 × Si80, I75 × Si120, I100 × Si80, I100 × Si120 applications with the same severity level. While the Si40 dose gave good results at I75 and I100 irrigation levels, its effect decreased at I25 and I50 irrigation levels. At different irrigation levels where different doses of silicon were applied, I25 irrigation had the lowest leaf chlorophyll and relative moisture content and the most severe membrane damage, while I50 irrigation had a moderate effect. Leaf chlorophyll and moisture content increased, and membrane damage decreased in I75 × 80 kg ha–1 Si, I75 × 120 kg ha–1 Si, I100 × 80 kg ha–1 Si and I100 × 120 kg ha–1 Si applications. As a result, when the effects of the applications covering two years on plant growth and yield were evaluated, the most successful irrigation levels were determined as I75, I100, and the most successful silicon doses; were determined as 80 kg ha–1 and 120 kg ha–1.

References

  1. Ahanger, M.A., Tomar, N.S., Tittal, M., Argal, S., Agarwal, R.M. (2017). Plant growth under water/salt stress: ROS production; antioxidants and significance of added potassium under such conditions. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 23, 731–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-017-0462-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-017-0462-7
  2. Balestrini, R., Chitarra, W., Antoniou, C., Ruocco, M., Fotopoulos, V. (2018). Improvement of plant performance under water deficit with the employment of biological and chemical priming agents. J. Agric. Sci. 156, 680–688. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0021859618000126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859618000126
  3. Barreto, R.F., Schiavon Jr, A.A., Maggio, M.A., Prado, R.D. (2017). Silicon alleviates ammonium toxicity in cauliflower and in broccoli. Sci. Hortic., 225(1), 743–750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.08.014
  4. Cao, B., Wang, L., Gao, S., Xia, J., Xu, K. (2017). Silicon-mediated changes in radial hydraulic conductivity and cell wall stability are involved in silicon-induced drought resistance in tomato. Protoplasma, 254, 2295–2304. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00709-017-1115-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-017-1115-y
  5. Chen, D., Wang, S., Yin, L., Deng, X. (2018). How does silicon mediate plant water uptake and loss under water deficiency?. Front. Plant Sci., 9, 281. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00281
  6. De la Torre-González, A., Montesinos-Pereira, D., Blasco, B., Ruiz, J.M. (2018). Influence of the proline metabolism and glycine betaine on tolerance to salt stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) commercial genotypes. J. Plant Physiol. 231, 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPLPH.2018.10.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2018.10.013
  7. Doorenbos, J. (1977). Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements, FAO, Roma (Italia).
  8. Jadhao, K.R., Bansal, A., Rout, G.R. (2020). Silicon amendment induces synergistic plant defense mechanism against pink stem borer (Sesamia inferens Walker.) in finger millet (Eleusine coracana Gaertn.). Sci. Rep., 10, e4229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61182-0
  9. Kørup, K., Laerke, P.E., Baadsgaard, H., Andersen, M.N., Kristensen, K., Münnich, C., Didion, T., Jensen, E.S., Mårtensson, L.-.M., Jørgensen, U. (2018). Biomass production and water use efficiency in perennial grasses during and after drought stress. GCB Bioenergy, 10, 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12464
  10. Lee, S.K., Sohn, E.Y., Hamayun, M., Yoon, J.Y., Lee, I. J. (2010). Effect of silicon on growth and salinity stress of soybean plant grown under hydroponic system. Agrofor. Syst., 80(3), 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9299-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9299-6
  11. Lozano, C.S., Rezende, R., Hachmann, T.L., Santos, F.A.S., Lorenzoni, M.Z., Souza, Á.H.C. (2018). Yield and quality of melon under silicon doses and irrigation management in a greenhouse. Pesqui. Agropecu. Trop., 48(2),140–146. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-40632018v4851265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-40632018v4851265
  12. Nemeskéri, E., Helyes, L. (2019). Physiological responses of selected vegetable crop species to water stress. Agronomy, 9(8), 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9080447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9080447
  13. Nunes, A.M.C., Nunes, L.R.L., Rodrigues, A.J.O., Uchoȃ, K.S.A. (2019). Silício na tolerância ao estresse hídrico em tomateiro [English title]. Rev. Cient. Rur., 21(2), 239–258 [language of the article]. https://doi.org/10.30945/rcr-v21i2.2658 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30945/rcr-v21i2.2658
  14. Pradhan, A., Naik, N., Sahoo, K.K. (2015). RNAi mediated drought and salinity stress tolerance in plants. Amer, J. Plant Sci., 6, 1990–2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2015.612200
  15. Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Omidi, M., Naghavi, M.R., Etminan, A., Mehrabi, A.A., Poczai, P., Bayat, H. (2019). Effect of water deficit stress on seedling biomass and physio-chemical characteristics in different species of wheat possessing the D genome. Agronomy 9, 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9090522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9090522
  16. Singh, A.K., Ansari, M.W., Pareek, A., Singla-Paree, S.L. (2008). Raising salinity tolerant rice: recent progress and future perspectives. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants, 14, 137–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-008-0013-3
  17. Rejeb, K. Ben, Abdelly, C., Savouré, A. (2014). How reactive oxygen species and proline face stress together. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 80, 278–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Plaphy.2014.04.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.04.007
  18. Sánchez-Rodríguez, E., Rubio-Wilhelmi, M., Cervilla, L.M., Blasco, B., Rios, J.J., Rosales, M.A., Romero, L., Ruiz, J.M. (2010). Genotypic differences in some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress under moderate drought in tomato plants. Plant Sci., 178(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Plantsci.2009.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.10.001
  19. Shen, X., Zhou, Y., Duan, L., Li, Z., Eneji, A.E., Li, J. (2010). Silicon effects on photosynthesis and antioxidant parameters of soybean seedlings under drought and ultraviolet-B radiation. J. Plant Physiol., 167, 1248–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPLPH.2010.04.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2010.04.011
  20. Souza, L.C., Melo, N.C., Siqueira, J.A.M., Silva, V.F.A., Oliveira Neto, C.F. (2015). Comportamento bioquímico no milho submetido ao déficit hídrico e a diferentes concentrações de silício [Biochemical behavior in grass subjected to drought and different concentrations of silicon]. Revista Agrarian, 8(29), 260–267 [in Portuguese].
  21. Soloklui, A.A.G., Ershadi, A., Fallahi, E. (2012). Evaluation of cold hardiness in seven Iranian commercial pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars. HortScience, 47(12), 1821–1825. https://doi.org/10.21273/Hortscı.47.12.1821 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.47.12.1821
  22. Zhang, Z.S., Wei, X.H., Li, X.R., Wang, X.P., Xie, Z.K. (2004). Analysis on investment and benefit of harvested rainwater utilization in the northwest loess Plateau. Adv. Water Sci., 6, 022.
  23. Zhang, F., He, J.-D., Ni, Q.-D., Wu, Q.-S., Zou, Y.-N. (2018). Enhancement of drought tolerance in trifoliate orange by mycorrhiza: changes in root sucrose and proline metabolisms. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca, 46, 270–276. https://doi.org/ 10.15835/nbha46110983 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha46110983
  24. Zhu, Y., Gong, H. (2014). Beneficial effects of silicon on salt and drought tolerance in plants. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 34, 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0194-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0194-1
  25. Wang, Y., Gao, S., He, X., Li, Y., Li, P., Zhang, Y., Chen, W. (2019). Growth, secondary metabolites and enzyme activity responses of two edible fern species to drought stress and rehydration in northeast China. Agronomy, 9, 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9030137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9030137
  26. Weerahewa, D., Somapala, K. (2016). Role of silicone on enhancing disease resistance in tropical fruits and vegetables: a review. OUSL J., 11(1), 135–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4038/ouslj.v11i0.7347

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.