Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
ASPHC Baner

Tom 19 Nr 3 (2020)

Artykuły

MITIGATION OF HEAT STRESS EFFECTS BY USING SHADE NET ON WASHINGTON NAVEL ORANGE TREES GROWN IN AL-NUBARIA REGION, EGYPT

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2020.3.2
Przesłane: 21 marca 2019
Opublikowane: 2020-04-07

Abstrakt

High temperature stress can be detrimental to plants, resulting in reduced fruit yield and increased incidences of fruit disorders. One strategy that farmers can use to maintain or increase their yields in the face of a changing climate is to adjust of farm climate by using shade net on the trees. Such, the use of shade netting on Washington navel orange planted on the sandy soil in Al-Nubaria region, Egypt were studied during two successive seasons, either using a permanent shade throughout all the season or using a moveable shade for certain period from the first of March until the end of June for every season. Growth (No. of shoots/one meter branch, No. of leaves/shoot, shoot length and chlorophyll content of the leaves, leaf area and tree canopy), macronutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg) and micronutrients (Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu, Na) content in the leaves, fruit characteristics (number, weight, diameter, peel thickness, total soluble solids, total acidity and ascorbic acid), yield and crop efficiency, were determined. It can be concluded that covering Washington navel orange trees grown on sandy soil with shade net especial covering the trees for certain period was very effective at protecting orange trees and led to improve the growth, increase the yield and maintain fruit quality.

Bibliografia

  1. Abd El-Naby, S.K.M., El-Sonbaty, M.R. (2016). Navel orange production in relation with replacement of chemical fertilizers by organic manures on sandy soil in Egypt. Int. J. PharmTech Res., 9(4), 8–17.
  2. Abd El-Naby, S.K.M., Abd El-Moneim, E.A.A., Abd-Allah, A.S.E. (2004). Effect of source and date of organic manure application on growth, yield, fruit quality and mineral content of Washington navel orange trees grown in sandy soil. Minufiya Agric. Res., 29(2), 515– 540.
  3. Alloway, B.J., Jackson, A.P. (1991). The behavior of heavy metals in sewage sludge amended soils. Sci. Total Environ., 100, 151–176.
  4. AOAC – Association of Official Agriculture Chemists (1995). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. Arlington, Virginia, USA, chap. (45)18–20, (37)10.
  5. Chapman, H.D., Pratt, P.E. (1978). Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants and Waters. Univ. of California, Div. Agric. Sci., vol. 4034.
  6. Cottanie, A., Verloo, M., Kiekens, L., Velghe, G., Camerlynch, R. (1982). Chemical Analysis of Plant and Soils. Lab. Anal. Agroch. State Univ., Ghent, Belgium, chap. 2, 14–32, chap. 3, 33–53.
  7. Dayioglu, A., Hepaksoy, S. (2016). Effects of shading nets on sunburn and quality of Granny Smith apple fruits. Acta Hortic., 1139, 523–528. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1139.90
  8. Duncan, D.B. (1955). Multiple ranges and multiple F testes. Biometrics, 11, 1–42.
  9. Espinoza, L.A, McNeal, B.L., Nguyen, J.H. (1998). Nutrient and metal trends as a result of biosolids application to a south Florida citrus grove. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Florida, 57, 39–54.
  10. Farag, K.M., Nagy, N.M.N. (2012). Effective Reduction of postset and preharvest abscissions and increasing the yield of Washington navel orange fruits by 1-MCP, GA and NAA. J. Appl. Sci. Res., 8(10), 5132–5141.
  11. Gent, M.P.N. (2007). Effect of degree and duration of shade on quality of greenhouse tomato. HortScience, 42(3), 514–520. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.42.3.514
  12. Ignasi, I., Alegre, S. (2006). The effect of anti-hail nets on fruit protection, radiation, temperature, quality and profitability of ‘Mondial Gala’ apples. J. Appl. Hortic., 8(2), 91–100.
  13. Ilić, S.Z., Fallik, E. (2017). Light quality manipulation improves vegetable quality at harvest and postharvest:
  14. A review. Environ. Exp. Bot. 139, 79–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.04.006
  15. Israeli, Y., Plaut, Z., Schwartz, A. (1995). Effect of shade on banana morphology, growth and production. Sci. Hortic., 62, 45–59.
  16. Jackson, M.H. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi, Chap. 8, 183–204.
  17. Jifon, J.L., Syvertsen, J.P. (2001). Effects of moderate shade on citrus leaf gas exchange, fruit yield and quality. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc., 114, 177–181.
  18. Jones, W.W., Embleton, T.W. (1960). Leaf analysis nitrogen content program for orange. Calif. Citrogen, 16(10), 321.
  19. Jutamanee, K., Ommon, S. (2016). Improving photosynthetic performance and some fruit quality traits in mango trees by shading. Photosynthetica, 54(4), 542–550. DOI: 10.1007/s11099-016-0210-1
  20. Krizek, D.T., Saftner, R.A., Park, E., Abbott, J.A., Camp, M.J., Clark, H.D. (2006). Yield data from 2005 and instrumental and sensory evaluation of tomato fruits from plants grown in high tunnels at Beltsville, MD or obtained from commercial sources. HortScience, 41, 1083. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.41.4.1083A
  21. Léchaudel, M., Génard, M., Lescourret, F., Urban, L., Jannoyer, M. (2002). Leaf-to-fruit ratio affects water and dry-matter content of mango fruit. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol., 77, 773–777. DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2002.11511571
  22. Lindsay, W.L., Norvell, W.A. (1978). Development of
  23. a DTPA micronutrient soil tests for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci. Am. J., 42, 421–428.
  24. Mahmood, A., Hu, Y., Tanny, J., Asantea, E.A. (2018). Effects of shading and insect-proof screens on crop microclimate and production: A review of recent advances. Sci. Hortic., 241, 241–251. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.06.078
  25. Marouelli, W.A., Silva, W.L. (2005). Drip irrigation frequency for processing tomatoes during vegetative growth stage. Pes. Agropec. Brasil., 40, 661–666. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-204X2005000700006
  26. Marsh, K.B., Richardson A.C., Macrae, E.A. (1999). Early- and mid-season temperature effects on the growth and composition of Satsuma mandarins. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol., 74(4), 443–451. DOI: 10.1080/14620316.1999.11511135
  27. Mata, D.A., Botto, J.F. (2009). Manipulation of light environment to produce high-quality Poinsettia plants. HortScience, 44(3), 702–706. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.44.3.702
  28. Medany, M.A., Abdrabbo, M.A.A., Farag, A.A., Hassanien, M.K., Abou-Hadid, A.F. (2009). Growth and productivity of mango grown under greenhouse conditions. Egypt. J. Hort. 36(2), 373–382.
  29. Ngouajio, M., Wang, G., Goldy, R. (2007). Withholding of drip irrigation between transplanting and flowering increases the yield of field-grown tomato under plastic mulch. Agric. Water Manag., 87, 285–291. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2006.07.007
  30. Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S., Dean, L.A. (1954). Estimation of phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Dept. Agric., Circular No. 939, 1–19.
  31. Plummer, D.T. (1978). An introduction to practical biochemistry, 2nd ed. Mc Graw Hill Book Company, London, p. 144.
  32. Roose, M.L., Cole, D.A., Atki, D., Kupper, R.S. (1989). Yield and tree size of four citrus cultivars on 21 rootstocks in California. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 114(4), 678–684.
  33. Rylski, I., Spigelman, M. (1986). Effect of shading on plant developments, yield and fruit quality of sweet pepper grown under conditions of high temperatures and radiation Sci. Hortic., 29, 31–35.
  34. Shrestha, T.N., Balakrishnan, K. (1985). Estimation of leaf area in acid lime by non-destructive analysis. South
  35. Indian Hortic., 33(6), 393–394.
  36. Snedecor, G.W., Cochran, W.G. (1982). Statistical, 6th ed. The Iowa State Univ. Press, Amess, Iowa, USA,
  37. –372.
  38. Storey, R., Treeby, M.T. (1999). Short- and long-term growth of navel orange fruit. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol., 74(4), 464–471. DOI: 10.1080/14620316.1999.11511138
  39. Syvertsen, J.P., Smith, M.L. (1996). Nitrogen uptake efficiency and leaching losses from bysimeter-grown citrus trees fertilized at three nitrogen rates. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 121(1), 57–62.
  40. Takeda, F., Veazie, P.P. (2009). The nuts and bolts of high tunnel production and manipulation for specialized applications: introduction to the workshop. HortScience, 44(2), 230. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.44.2.230
  41. Werner, B. (1992). Nutritional Disorders of Plants. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena–Stuttgart–New York, 304–353.
  42. Whitney, J.D., Wheaton, T.A., Castel, W.S., Tucker, D.P.H. (1995). Tree height, fruit size and fruit yield affect manual orange harvesting rates. Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc., 108, 112–118.
  43. Wien, H.C. (2009). Microenvironmental variations within the high tunnel. HortScience, 44(2), 235–238. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.44.2.235
  44. Wutscher, H.K., Smith, P.F. (1994). Citrus. In: Nutrient Deficiencies and Toxicities in Crop Plants, Bennett, W.F. (ed.). Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena–Stuttgart, chap. 17, 165–170.
  45. Zhou, K., Jerszurki, D., Sadka, A., Shlizerman, L., Rachmilevitch, Sh., Ephrath, J. (2018). Effects of photoselective netting on root growth and development of young grafted orange trees under semi-arid climate. Sci. Hortic., 238, 272–280. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.04.054

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

<< < 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.