Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
ASPHC Baner

Tom 22 Nr 4 (2023)

Artykuły

Identification of water stress-tolerant edible pumpkin seed (Cucurbita pepo) genotypes using seed yield-based tolerance indices

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2023.4424
Przesłane: 30 sierpnia 2021
Opublikowane: 2023-08-31

Abstrakt

Pumpkin is usually cultivated in arid and semiarid regions, and the lack of water stress-tolerant cultivars is a major limiting factor. Therefore, this study was carried out to identify superior water stress-tolerant genotypes. For this purpose, 44 inbred lines with superior agronomic traits were selected from the gene pool. In addition, two hybrids (G1-Mert Bey F1 and G2-Sena Hanim F1) and two landraces (G3-Hatun Tırnağı and G4-Cercevelik) with high commercial value were used as commercial cultivars. The water stress indices were calculated from seed yields from the pumpkin genotypes grown in irrigated and water stress conditions in 2017 and 2018. The stress tolerance index (STI) determines tolerant and superior genotypes. From the principal component and cluster analyses’ findings, G9, G40, G32, G36, G5, G11, G22, G30, G37, and G13 showed the highest water stress tolerance among the inbred lines. During future breeding experiments, these inbred lines may have significant potential for developing novel water stress-tolerant cultivars for pumpkin cultivation in semiarid regions.

Bibliografia

  1. Achu, M.B., Fokou, E., Tchiégang, C., Fotso, M., Tchouanguep, F.M. (2005). Nutritive value of some Cucurbitaceae oil seeds from different regions in Cameron. Afr. J. Biot., 4(11), 1329–1334.
  2. Bahrami, F., Arzani, A., Karimi, V. (2014). Evaluation of yield-based drought tolerance indices for screening safflower genotypes. Agron J., 106, 1219–1224. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj13.0387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj13.0387
  3. Bidinger, F.R., Mahalakshmi, V., Rao, G.D.R. (1987). Assessment of drought resistance in pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.) Leeke) II Estimation of genotype response to stress. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 38, 49–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9870049
  4. Farshadfar, E., Javadinia, J. (2011). Evaluation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes for drought tolerance. Seed Pl. Impr., J. 27(4), 517–537.
  5. Fernandez, G.C.J. (1992). Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on the adaptation of vegetables and other food crops in temperature and water stress, Kuo, C.G. (ed.). Tainan, AVRDC Publication, 257–270.
  6. Fischer, R.A., Maurer, R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield response. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 29, 897–907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897
  7. Gavuzzi, P., Rizza, F., Palumbo, M., Campaline, R.G., Ricciardi, G.L., Borghi, B. (1997). Evaluation of field and laboratory predic¬tors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Can. J. Plant. Sci., 77(4), 523–531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/P96-130
  8. Kamrani, M., Hoseini, Y., Ebadollahi, A. (2018). Evaluation for heat stress tolerance in durum wheat genotypes using stress tolerance indices. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci., 64(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2017.1326104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2017.1326104
  9. Karipcin, M.Z., Sari, N., Kirnak, H. (2009). Determination of drought tolerance in domestic and wild watermelon genotypes. TÜBİTAK TBAG 107T613 result report.
  10. Kirigwi, F.M., Van Ginkel, M., Trethowan, R., Sears, R.G., Rajaram, S., Paulsen, G.M. (2004). Evaluation of selection strategies for wheat adaptation across water regimes. Euphytica, 135, 361–371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUPH.0000013375.66104.04
  11. Kristin, A.S., Senra, R.R., Perez, F.I., Enriquez, B.C., Gallegos, J.A.A., Vallego, P.R., Wassimi, N., Kelley, J.D. (1997). Improving common bean performance under drought stress. Crop Sci., 37(1), 43–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700010007x
  12. Kumar, R., Kaul, J., Dubey, R.B., Singode, A., Chikkappa G.K., Manivannan, A., Debnath, M.K. (2015). Assessment of drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) based on different indices. SABRAO J. Breed. Genet., 47(3), 291-298.
  13. Mohammadi, R. (2016). Efficiency of yield-based drought tolerance indices to identify tolerant genotypes in durum wheat. Euphytica, 211(1), 71–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1727-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1727-x
  14. Mohammadi, R., Abdulahi, A. (2017). Evaluation of durum wheat genotypes based on drought tolerance indices under different levels of drought stress. J. Agr. Sci., 62(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2298/JAS1701001M DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/JAS1701001M
  15. Mohammadi, S.A., Prasanna, B.M. (2003). Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants salient statistical tools and considerations. Crop Sci., 43(4), 1235–1248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.1235
  16. Naghavi, M.R., Aboughadareh, A.P., Khalili, M. (2013). Evaluation of drought tolerance indices for screening some of the corn (Zea mays L.) cultivars under environmental conditions. Not. Sci. Biol., 5(3), 388–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb539049
  17. Perez Gutierrez, R.M. (2016). Review of Cucurbita pepo (pumpkin) its phytochemistry and pharmacology. Med. Chem., 6(1), 12–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2161-0444.1000316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0444.1000316
  18. Rosielle, A.A., Hamblin, J. (1981). Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Sci., 21, 943–946. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x
  19. Seymen, M., Uslu, N., Türkmen, Ö., Juhaimi, F.A., Özcan, M.M. (2016). Chemical compositions and mineral contents of some hull-less pumpkin seed and oils. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 93, 1095–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-016-2850-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-016-2850-5
  20. Seymen, M., Yavuz, D., Dursun, A., Kurtar, E.S., Türkmen, Ö. (2019). Identification of drought-tolerant pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) genotypes associated with certain fruit characteristics, seed yield, and quality. Agric. Water Manag., 221, 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.05.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.05.009
  21. Seymen, M. (2021). Comparative analysis of the relationship between morphological, physiological, and biochemical properties in spinach (Spinacea oleracea L.) under deficit irrigation conditions. Turk. J. Agric. For., 45(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-2004-79 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-2004-79
  22. Shubha, V., Tyagi, A.K. (2007). Emerging trends in the functional genomics of the abiotic stress response in crop plants. Plant Biot. J., 5(3), 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14677652.2007.00239.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00239.x
  23. Stevenson, D.G., Eller, F.J., Wang, L., Jane, J.L., Wang, T., Inglett, G.E. (2007). Oil and tocopherol content and composition of pumpkin seed oil in 12 cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem., 55, 4005–4013. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0706979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0706979
  24. Yang, Y.F., Chang, Y. C., Jan, Y. H., Yang, C. J., Huang, M. S., Hsiao, M. (2020). Squalene synthase promotes the invasion of lung cancer cells via the osteopontin/ERK pathway. Oncogenesis, 9(8), 78. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41389-020-00262-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41389-020-00262-2
  25. Yavuz, D., Seymen, M., Yavuz, N., Türkmen, Ö. (2015). Effects of irrigation interval and quantity on the yield and quality of confectionary pumpkin grown under field conditions. Agric. Water Manag., 159, 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.06.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.06.025
  26. Yavuz, D., Seymen, M., Süheri, S., Yavuz, N., Türkmen, Ö., Kurtar, E.S. (2020). How do rootstocks of citron watermelon (Citrullus lanatus var. citroides) affect the yield and quality of watermelon under deficit irrigation?. Agric. Water Manag., 241, 106351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106351
  27. Yavuz, D., Seymen, M., Yavuz, N., Çoklar, H., Ercan, M. (2021). Effects of water stress applied at various phenological stages on yield, quality, and water use efficiency of melon. Agric. Water Manag., 246, 106673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106673 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106673

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

<< < 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.