Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin

Application of alternative distinguishing methods to identify disparities between the means in agricultural researches

DOROTA JANKOWSKA

Zakład Statystyki i Ekonometrii, Uniwersytet Rzeszowski pl. Ofiar Getta 4/5, 35-002 Rzeszów

AGNIESZKA MAJKA

Zakład Statystyki i Ekonometrii, Uniwersytet Rzeszowski pl. Ofiar Getta 4/5, 35-002 Rzeszów


Abstract

Besides reminding the basic assumptions of variance analysis, an alternative method of finding differences existing between the means in agricultural tests was presented in the article. The test of Kruskal-Wallis is such a method. Besides theoretical considerations, the calculation procedure of the test, carried out on the basis of data concerning fructification of edible lentil of Trebiszewska variety, was presented here, too. As a result of the calculations, it was found that only average crops of lentil, in the case of monoculture and full cultivation and in the case of monoculture and partial cultivation, were not different from each other, in the way statistically significant.

 

Keywords:

analysis of variance, nonparametric tests, Kruskal-Wallis test

Aczel A. D., 2007. Statystyka w zarządzaniu. PWN, Warszawa.

Ferguson G. A., Takane Y., 2004. Analiza statystyczna w psychologii i pedagogice. PWN, Warszawa.

Kala R., 2002. Statystyka dla przyrodników. WAR, Poznań.

Koronacki J., Mielniczuk J., 2004. Statystyka. WNT, Warszawa.


Published
2009-09-18



DOROTA JANKOWSKA 
Zakład Statystyki i Ekonometrii, Uniwersytet Rzeszowski pl. Ofiar Getta 4/5, 35-002 Rzeszów
AGNIESZKA MAJKA 
Zakład Statystyki i Ekonometrii, Uniwersytet Rzeszowski pl. Ofiar Getta 4/5, 35-002 Rzeszów



License

Articles are made available under the conditions CC BY 4.0 (until 2020 under the conditions CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Submission of the paper implies that it has not been published previously, that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

The author signs a statement of the originality of the work, the contribution of individuals, and source of funding.

 

Agronomy Science has adopted a self-archiving policy called blue by the Sherpa Romeo database. From 2021 authors can self-archive article postprints and editorial versions (under the CC BY 4.0 licence). Articles from earlier years (available under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence) can only be self-archived as editorial versions.


Most read articles by the same author(s)