COMPARISON OF CEMELE PEPPER WITH BELL PEPPER GENOTYPES (Capsicum annuum L. var. grossum) WITH RESPECT TO AGRONOMIC AND MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
This study was conducted in 2014 and 2015 to compare Cemele pepper with other bell peppers (Capsicum annuum L. var. grossum) genotypes with respect to agronomic and morphological traits. Totally 75 bell peppper genotypes were collected from the centrum and villages of Kırşehir province. For a total of 48 agronomic and morphological characteristics of pepper genotype, the characterization study of IPGRI according to the criteria of the International Union of Plant Protection Preservation (UPOV) were done made. As a result of the principal component analysis, total 11 main component axes were obtained and these axes represented 73.25% of the total variance. Genotypes were divided into 15 groups in dendrogram according to morphological and agronomic characteristics. The mean of the quantitative characteristics of each group was determined and it was determined which group or group was the difference between them. As a result of cluster analysis; D1, D20, D54, D67K, D43 and D39 coded genotypes were determined to be the most distant genotypes in terms of agronomic and morphological degree of relation. To conclude, with the identification of the genotypes of bell peppers in Kırşehir province, it will provide significant advantages in future pepper breeding studies as well as contributing to the formation of pepper database.
Cemele; pepper; genotype; characterisation; morphological; agronomic
Akıncı, S., Akıncı, İ.E. (2004). Evaluation of red pepper for spice (Capsicum annuum L.) germplasm resource of Kahramanmaraş region (Turkey). Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 7(5), 703–710.
Allard, R.W. (1999). Principles of plant breeding. Second Edition. Wiley, NY, USA. pp. 272.
Ballina-Gomez, H,, Latournerie-Moreno, L., Ruíz-Sánchez, E., Pérez-Gutiérrez, A., Rosado-Lugo, G. (2013). Morphological characterization of Capsicum annuum L. accessions from southern Mexico and their response to the Bemisia tabaci-Begomovirus complex. Chilean J. Agric. Res., 73(4), 329–338. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392 013000400 001
Belletti, P., Quagliotti, L. (1982). Collection and evaluation of pepper germplasm. Institute of Plant Breeding and Seed Production Uni. of Turin Via P. Giuria 15, 10126 Turin, Italy. Capsicum Newsletter, 1, 13–14.
Bianchi, P.A., Dutra, I.P., Moulin, M.M., Santos, J.O., Santos Júnior, A.C. (2016). Morphological characterization and analysis of genetic variability among pepper accessions. Ciênc. Rural, 46(7), 1151–1157. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20150825
Bicikliski, O., Trajkova, F., Mihajlov, L. (2018). Morphological characteristics of some pepper genotypes (Capsicum annuum L.) grown in conventional and organic agricultural systems: comparative analysis. Ann. Res. Rev. Biol., 28(3), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ARRB/2018/43308
Binbir, S., Baş, T. (2010). Characterization of some local pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) populations. Anadolu J. AARI, 20(2), 70–88. http://www.aari.gov.tr
Bliss, F.A. (1981). Utilization of vegetable germplasm. HortScience, 16(2), 129–132.
Bozokalfa, K., Eşiyok, D., Turhan, K. (2009). Patterns of phenotypic variation in a germplasm collection of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) from Turkey. Spanish J. Agric., 7(1), 83–95. DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2009071-401
Bozokalfa, M.K., Eşiyok, D. (2010). Genetic diversity in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) accessions as revealed by agronomic traits. Ege J. Agric. Res., 47(2), 123–134.
Brown, J.S. (1991). Principal component and cluster analysis of cotton cultivar variability a cross the U.S. cotton belt. Crop Sci., 31, 915–922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100040015x
Cole, P.S., Lovell, G., Bosland, P.W. (1993). Evaluation and increase of USDA capsicum germplasm. Evaluacióne incremento del germoplasma de Capsicum del Departamento de Agricultura de los EE. UU. Capsicum Eggplant Newsletter, 12, 39–41.
Djukic, Z., Milutinovic, S.,Petrovic R., Mladenovic, D. (2002). Morphological characteristics of new pepper lines. Proc. 2nd Balkan Symp. on Veg. & Potatoes, G. Paroussi et al. (eds.). Acta Hortic., 579, 189–191. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.579.30
Duman, İ., Düzyaman, E. (2004). A research on morphological variability in some important pepper genotypes grown in Turkey. Ege J. Agric. Res., 41(3), 55–66.
Eshbaugh, W.H. (1988). Capsicum germplasm collecting trip Bolivia 1987. Capsicum Eggplant Newsletter, 7, 24–26.
FAO. (2016). FAOSTAT Statistical databases. Available: http://www.fao.org. [date of access: 15.10.2018].
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
İnal, A. (2002). Importance and protection of local varieties. Ege Agricultural Research Institute Technical Brochure, Number: 3, Izmir.
Keleş, D. (2007). Characterization of different pepper genotypes and low temperature tolerance. Ph.D Thesis, Department of Horticulture Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences University of Çukurova, Adana, pp. 182.
Mohammadi, S.A., Prasana, B.M. (2003). Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants-salient statistical tools and considerations. Crop Sci., 43, 1235–1248. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 2135/cropsci2003.1235
Mutlu, S., Haytaoğlu, M.A., Kır, A., İçer, B. (2009). Morphological characterization of national gene bank pepper (Capsicum annum L.) accessions. Anadolu J. AARI, 19(1), 63–91.
Özdamar, K. (2004). Statistical data analysis with package programs (multivariate analysis). 5. Printing, pp. 528.
Şalk, A., Arın, L., Deveci, M., Polat, S. (2008). Special vegetable growing. Namık Kemal University, Faculty of Agriculture, Tekirdağ, pp. 448.
Şeniz, V. (1992). Tomato, pepper, eggplant cultivation book, TAV Foundation, Yalova pp. 128–152.
Sharma, V., Sood, S., Sood, V.K., Singh, Y. (2017). Morphological characterization of Bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L. var. grossum Sendt.) genotypes. Himachal J. Agric. Res., 43(1), 33–39.
Sneath, P.H.A., Sokal, R.R. (1973). Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, pp. 573.
Tabachnick, B.G., Fideli, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Ally and Bacon, Boston.
Tan, A. (1992). Plant diversity and plant genetic resources in Turkey, J. AARI., 2(2), 50–54.
TARiM (2017). Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 2017 Budget Presentation. November 2016.
TUIK (2017). Turkey Statistical Institute (TUIK) crop production statistics. Available: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/bitkisel.zul [date of access: 10.10.2018].
UPOV (1994). Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability. TG/76/7, pp. 33.
Vural, H., Eşiyok, D., Duman, İ. (2000). Culture vegetables. Ege University, Izmir, pp. 440.
Wien, H.C. (1997). The physiology of vegetable crops. CAP International. The Cambridge Uni., UK., 259–293. [in press]
Zewdie, Y., Tong, N., Bosland, P.W. (2004). Establishing a core collection of capsicum using a cluster analysis with enlightened selection of accessions. Genetic Res. Crop Evol., 51, 147–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GRES.0000020858.96226.38
Zewdie, Y., Zeven, A. C. (1997). Variation in Yugoslavian hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) accessions. Euphytica, 97(1), 81–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003028703431
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles are made available under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International (recognition by authorship, non-commercial use, no dependent works).
Submission of the paper implies that it has not been published previously, that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
The author signs a statement of the originality of the work, the contribution of individuals, and source of funding.