Abstract
The aim of the study was to characteristize some chemical and physical parameters that determine the usability of wild boar and fatteners of meat. The material for the study included samples of musculus longissimus dorsi from female carcasses of 7 wild boars at the age of around 10 months, weighing 30–34 kg, obtained during collective hunting in the Lublin province in January, and 8 fatteners Polish Landrace breed at the age of 5.5 months weighing approx. 110 kg. The influence of the species on the nutritional and technological quality of meat was examined. The obtained data were submitted to univariate analysis of variance by using the Statistica 5.0 software package. Water, protein and intramuscular fat content in venison and pork was at a similar level, whereas venison was characterized by higher amounts of ash (about 0.35 percentage units) and lower (about 11.25 mg) cholesterol (differences statistically significant at P ≤ 0.01). The animals’ genotype statistically significantly differentiated the technological characteristics of the meat. Venison meat was characterized by higher pH24 and higher WHC during storage and thermal treatment and a darker color in relation to pig meat. Generally, higher quality of meat characterized the wild boar meat, compared to the fatteners, so it can be a competitive product to pork.
References
AOAC, 2000. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 17th ed. Arlington, Virginia.
C.I.E. (Commission International del' Eclairage), 1978. International Commission on Illumination, Recommendations on Uniform Color Spaces, Color Difference Equations, Psychometric Color Terms. Suppl. 15 (E-1.3.1) 1971/(TO-1.3). Bureau Central de la C.I.E., Paris.
Chachułowa J., Skomiał J., 1997. Żywienie zwierząt i paszoznawstwo. SGGW, Warszawa.
Chemnitz C., Becheva S., 2014. Meat atlas. Facts and figures about the animals we eat. Available at: www.foeeurope.org/meat-atlas, last accessed 24.02.14.
Connor D.J., Mínguez M.I., 2012. Evolution not revolution of farming systems will best feed and green the world. Global Food Secur. 1, 106–113, doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2012.10.004.
Dannenberger D., Nuernberg G., Nuernberg K., Hagemann E., 2013. The effects of gender, age and region on macro- and micronutrient contents and fatty acid profiles in the muscles of roe deer and wild boar in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (Germany). Meat Sci. 94, 39–46.
de Boer J., Boersema J.J., Aiking H., 2009. Consumers’ motivational associations favoring freerange meat or less meat. Ecological Economics, 68, 850–860.
de Boer J., Schösler H., Aiking H., 2014. ‘‘Meatless days’’ or ‘‘less but better’’? Exploring strategies to adapt Western meat consumption to health and sustainability challenges. Appetite 76, 120–128.
Dransfield E., 2001. Consumer issues and acceptance of meat. In: 47th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland, 72–78.
Dransfield E., 2003. Consumer acceptance – meat quality aspects. In: Consistency of Quality. 11th International Meat Symposium, Pretoria, South Africa, 146–159.
Florowski T., Pisula A., Adamczak L., Buczyński J.T., Orzechowska B., 2006. Technological parametres of meat in pigs of two Polish local breeds – Zlotnicka Spotted and Pulawska. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 24, 3, 217–224.
Hocquette J.F., Gondret F., Baéza E., Médale F., Jurie C., Pethick D. W., 2010. Intramuscular fat content in meat-producing animals: development, genetic and nutritional control, and identification of putative markers. Animal 4 (2), 303–319.
Hoffman L.C., Wiklund E., 2006. Game and venison. Meat for modern consumer. Meat Sci. 74, 197–208.
Honikel K.O., 1998. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci. 49 (4), 447–457.
Ivanović S.D., Stojanović Z.M., Popov-Raljic J.V., Baltić M.Ž., Pisinov B.P., Nešić K.D., 2013. Meat quality characteristics of Duroc × Yorkshire, Duroc × Yorkshire × Wild Boar and Wild Boar. Hem. Ind. 67 (6), 999–1006, available online at: http://www.ache.org.rs/HI/.
Jukna V., Valaitienė V., 2012. The comparison of meat nutritional and technological properties in different animals. Vet. Zootech. 59 (81), 34–39.
Kasprzyk A., 2012. Przydatność technologiczna i kulinarna mięsa mieszańców pochodzących z krzyżowania dzika (Sus scrofa scrofa) z wybranymi rasami hodowlanymi świń. Rozpr. Nauk. UP w Lublinie 362, Lublin.
Kasprzyk A., Babicz M., Kamyk-Kamieński P., Lechowski J., 2013. Slaughter value and meat quality of Pulawska and Polish Landrace breeds fatteners. Annales UMCS, sec. EE, Zootechnica 31, 3, 1–9.
Latvala T., Niva M., Mäkelä J., Pouta E., Heikkilä J., Kotro J., 2012. Diversifying meat consumption patterns: Consumers’ self-reported past behaviour and intentions for change. Meat Sci. 92, 71–77.
Lugasi A., 2006. A vadhúsok szerepe a táplálkozásban tekintettel kémiai összetételükre és egyes élelmiszer-biztonsági szempontokra. A Hús 2, 85–90.
Lusky K., Lippert A., Stoyke M., Bohm D., Hecht H., Luthard M., 1994. Environmental contaminants in roe deer, red deer, fallow deer, moufflon and wild boars. Fleischwirtschaft 74 (2), 189–191.
MacRae J., O’Reilly L., Morgan P., 2005. Desirable characteristics of animal products from a human health perspective. Liv. Prod. Sci. 94, 95–103.
Mann N., 2000. Dietary lean red meat and human evolution. Eur. J. Clinic. Nutr. 39, 71–79.
Marchiori A.F. de Felício P.E., 2003. Quality of wild boar meat and commercial pork. Sci. Agric. 60 (1) 1–5.
Marlow L.J., Hayes W.K., Soret S., Carter R.L., Schwab E.R., Sabaté J., 2009. Diet and the environment. Does what you eat matter? Am. J. Clinic. Nutr. 89 (5), 1699S–1703S, doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736Z.
Ngapo T.M., Dransfield E., 2006. British consumers preferred fatness levels in beef: surveys from 1955, 1982 and 2002. Food Qual. Prefer. 17, 412–417.
Pohja N.S., Ninivaara F.P., 1957. Die Bestimmung der Wasserbindung des Fleisches mittels der Konsandrückmethods. Fleischwirtschaft 9, 193–195.
Postolache A.N., Lazăr R., Boişteanu P.C., 2010. Researches on the characterization of physical and chemical parameters of pefrigerated meat from wild boar sampled form the N-E part of Romania. Lucrări Stiin. J., Seria Zootehnie, 54 (15), 193–197.
Prange H., Jugrrt L., Schrener E., 1977. Untersuchungen zur Muskelfleischqualität beim Schwein. Arch. Experim. Vet. Med. 31 (2), 235–248.
Orzechowska B., Tyra M., Mucha A., Żak G., 2012. Jakość tusz świń rasy wbp i pbz ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem zawartości tłuszczu śródmięśniowego w zależności od poziomu mięsności. Rocz. Nauk. Zoot. 39, 1, 77–85.
Quaresma G.M.A., Alves P.S., Trigo-Rodrigues I., Pereira-Silva R., Santos N., Lemos C.P.J., Barreto S.A., Bessa B.J.R., 2011. Nutritional evaluation of the lipid fraction of feral wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa) meat. Meat Sci. 89, 457–461.
Rhee K.S., Dutson T.R., Smith G.C., Hostetler R.L., Reiser R., 1982. Effects of changes in intramuscular and subcutaneous fat levels on cholesterol content of raw and cooked beef steaks. J. Food Sci. 47 (3), 716–719.
GUS, 2010. Rocznik Statystyczny Rolnictwa 2009. Warszawa.
GUS, 2011. Rocznik Statystyczny Rolnictwa 2010. Warszawa.
GUS, 2012. Rocznik Statystyczny Rolnictwa 2011. Warszawa.
GUS, 2013. Rocznik Statystyczny Rolnictwa 2012. Warszawa.
GUS, 2014. Rocznik Statystyczny Rolnictwa 2013. Warszawa.
Sales J., Kotrba R., 2013. Meat from wild boar (Sus scrofa L.): A review. Meat Sci. 94, 187–201.
Science Daily, 2010. Agriculture, food production among worst environmental offenders, report finds. Available at: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/06/100609094353, last accessed 10.07.2014.
Skobrak Bodnar E.S., Bodnar K., 2014. Main traits of the wild boar meat in its marketing. Lucrări Ştiin., serie I, 16(2), 81–86.
Szmańko T., Górecka J., Korzeniowska M., Malicki A., Eeremenko E., 2007. Comparison of chosen quality parameters of meat from wild boar and domestic pigs. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 57, (4), 523–528.
Szołtysek K., Dziuba Sz., 2008. Żywność ekologiczna jako czynnik poprawy zdrowia. Pr. Nauk. UE we Wrocławiu, Technologia 13, 30, 95–103.
Tucker C.A., 2014. The significance of sensory appeal for reduced meat consumption. Appetite 81, 168–179.
Zawadzki A., Szuba-Trznadel A., Fuchs B., 2011. Baza pokarmowa, charakterystyka populacji i sezonowość rozrodu dzików (Sus scrofa) na terenach Gór Kaczawskich. Zesz. Nauk. UP we Wrocławiu, Biol. Hod. Zw. 63, 583, 363–376.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
