Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 24 No. 3 (2014)

Articles

Evaluation of the suitability of new tulip cultivars for cut flower production in winter

Submitted: May 17, 2019
Published: 2014-09-16

Abstract

The aim of the research was to estimate the suitability of 15 new tulip cultivars for winter forcing. In the presented research 13 cultivars of the tulip Triumph Group, ‘Andre Rieu’ from the Single Late Group and ‘Princess Household’ from the Fosteriana Group were evaluated. The tulips were cooled for 14 and 16 weeks in standard conditions, at the temperature of +9°C and then placed in a glasshouse for forcing at the end of January and in the second 10-days’ period of February. Tulip bulbs cooled for 16 weeks and then forced since the second 10-days’ period of February acquainted the marketable value more quickly and formed flowers of much better quality in comparison to those cooled for 14 weeks and forced since the end of January. On the basis of the observations, the following cultivars might be recommended for winter forcing: ‘Copex’, ‘Editie.NL’, ‘George W. Bush’, ‘Lemon Ice’, ‘Piet Veerman’ and ‘Princess Household’, as they are characterized by quick growth, attractive appearance and long vase life. The following cultivars proved less suitable for forcing: ‘Laura Bush’, ‘Prins Willem Alexander’, ‘Purk’, ‘Red Rover’, ‘Topkapi’, ‘Vittorio’ and ‘Jan Siemiernik’. They are characterized by poor growth and unattractive appearance. The flowers of those cultivars were small and poorly coloured, with an undefined shape and short life. The cultivar ‘Andre Rieu’ from the Single Late Group is characterized by  a long forcing period and poor growth. Besides, it formed small and faintly coloured flowers while their stems were short, delicate and with few leaves. Because of poor quality and a low decorative value of flowers, this cultivar is not recommended for winter forcing.

References

Hetman J., Laskowska H., Durak W., 2000. Oddziaływanie nawozów niekonwencjonalnych na plon i pędzenie tulipana. Zesz. Nauk. ISiK 7, 139–144.

Inamoto K., Hase T., Doi M., Imanishi H., 2000. Effect of duration of bulb chilling on dry matter distribution in hydroponically forced tulips. Sci. Hortic. 85, 295–306.

Krause J., 1998. Ocena przydatności wybranych odmian tulipanów Fostera do pędzenia w doniczkach. Fol. Univ. Agric. Stetin. 187, Agricultura 70, 43–47.

Krause J., 2000. Pędzenie tulipanów w wodzie. W: Techniki szklarniowe i rośliny cebulowe. XIII Ogólnopolski Zjazd Kwiaciarzy, Skierniewice, 19–20 października 2000 r. – materiały z konferencji. Instytut Sadownictwa i Kwiaciarstwa, Stowarzyszenie Producentów Ozdobnych Roślin Cebulowych, Skierniewice, 19–22.

Krause J., 2006. Tulipan. W: M. Jerzy (red.), Kwiaty cięte uprawiane pod osłonami. PWRiL, Poznań, 293–309.

Krause J., Zygmunt K., 2000. Ocena przydatności kilkunastu odmian tulipanów do pędzenia w wodzie. Rocz. AR Pozn. 323, Ogrodnictwo 31, cz. 1, 93–100.

Krzymińska A., 2008. Usefulness of some hyacinthus cultivars for forcing in water. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 7 (3), 87–92.

Le Nard M., De Hertogh A., 1993. Tulipa. W: The physiology of flower bulbs. Elsevier, Amsterdam–London–New York–Tokyo, 617–682.

Marcinek B., 2013. Wpływ długości okresu chłodzenia na przydatność do pędzenia tulipanów pędzonych w okresie zimowym. Annales UMCS, sec. EEE, Horticultura 23 (1), 8–17.

Marcinek B., Laskowska H., Szmagara M., 2013. The effect of the bulb-cooling period on the quality of cut tulip flowers. Ann. Warsaw Univ. Life Sci. – SGGW, Horticult. Landsc. Architect. 34, 27–33.

Rietveld P.L., Wilkinsoon C., Franseen H., Balk P.A., Plas L. van der, Weisbeek P.J., Boer A.D. de, 2000. Low temperature sensing in tulip (Tulipa gesneriana L.) is mediated through an increased response to auxin. J. Exp. Bot. 51 (344), 587–594.

Saniewski M., Kawa-Miszczak L., 1992. Hormonal control of growth and development of tulips. Acta Hortic. 325, 43–54.

Sochacki D., Chojnowska E., 2005. Quality evaluation of forced tulip flowers depending on bulb production environmental and forcing medium. Acta Hortic. 673, 675–678

Sochacki D., Chojnowska E., Treder J., 2005. Wpływ warunków uprawy cebul i podłoża do pędzenia na jakość kwiatów ciętych tulipanów. Zesz. Probl. Postęp. Nauk Rol. 504, 257–262.

Sprzączka I., Laskowska H., 2007. Wpływ długości chłodzenia cebul na wzrost i walory dekoracyjne wybranych odmian tulipanów w uprawie doniczkowej. Rocz. AR Pozn. 383, Ogrodnictwo 41, 201–205.

Szlachetka W., 1996. Tulipany pędzone sposobem standardowym na kwiat cięty i doniczkowe. Biul. Stow. Prod. Ozdob. Rośl. Cebul. 4, 37–45.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.