Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Agronomy Science Baner text

Vol. 75 No. 3 (2020)

Articles

Economic aspects of foliar feeding in winter rape (Brassica napus L.) cultivation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2020.3.4
Submitted: April 3, 2020
Published: 02.10.2020

Abstract

Production of rapeseed in Poland is characterized by low stability resulting from both high yield variability and fluctuations in the profitability of growing this plant. The aim of the research was to determine the profitability of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) seed production under conditions of foliar feeding with sulfur, boron and amino acids. The profitability analysis was performed on the basis of the research results from the field experiment carried out in 2016–2019 at the Zawady Agricultural Experimental Station belonging to the University of Natural Sciences and Humanities in Siedlce. The experiment investigated the influence of various variants of foliar feeding: 1. control object (K) – without the use of foliar feeding and amino acid,  2. Aminoplant amino acid (A), 3. Siarkomag foliar fertilizer + Bormax foliar fertilizer (S+B), 4. Siarkomag foliar fertilizer + Bormax foliar fertilizer + Aminoplant amino acid (S+B+A). The own research showed that the size of harvested winter rape seed yield depended on individual variants of foliar feeding. It was found that the highest seed yield was obtained using a mixture of Siarkomag and Bormax foliar fertilizers and the amino acid Aminoplant – 3.77 t·ha–1, while the lowest yield was obtained on the control object (without foliar feeding) – 3.18 t.ha–1, yield growth was 18.5%. The direct surplus from 1 ha of winter oilseed rape cultivation ranged from 1391.55 ha–1 (control object) to 2155.53 ha–1 (a mixture of Siarkomag and Bormax foliar fertilizers and the amino acid Aminoplant). On the other hand, the income from cultivation of 1 ha, including direct payments, ranged from PLN 1896.23 ha–1 on the control object to PLN 2660.21 ha–1 in variant 4.

References

  1. Augustyńska-Grzymek I., Cholewa M., Dziewulski M., Orłowski A., Skarżyńska A., Ziętek I., Zmarzłowski K., 2009. Produkcja, koszty i nadwyżka bezpośrednia wybranych produktów rolniczych w 2008 roku. IERiGŻ-PIB, Warszawa.
  2. Bojarszczuk J., Księżak J., 2013. Ocena ekonomiczna uprawy sorgo w systemie ekologicznym. Rocz. Nauk. SERiA 15(4), 63 69.
  3. Budzyński W., Jankowski K., Truszkowski W., 2005. Agricultural and economical effectiveness of production technologies of winter oilseed rape in selected big area farms. Rośl. Oleiste – Oilseed Crops 26(2), 407–419.
  4. Czarnik M., Jarecki W., Bobrecka-Jamro D., Jarecka A., 2015. The effects of sowing density and foliar feeding on yielding of winter oilseed rape cultivars. Rośl. Oleiste – Oilseed Crops 36(1), 60–68.
  5. Dobek T., 2002. Ekonomiczna i energetyczna ocena różnych technologii produkcji rzepaku ozi-mego. Inż. Roln. 63(3), 125–131.
  6. Dobek T., 2008. Efektywność ekonomiczna i energetyczna produkcji biodiesla w zależności od stosowanych technologii uprawy rzepaku ozimego. Acta Agrophys. 11(2), 369–379.
  7. Gugała M., Sikorska A., Zarzecka K., Krasnodębska E., Kapela K., 2017a. Impact of rape seed density on production profitability. Rocz. Nauk. SERiA 19(2), 66–69. Gugała M., Sikorska A., Zarzecka K., Krasnodębska E., Kapela K., Mystkowska I., 2017b. Profitability of application biostimulators in winter rape crop. Rocz. Nauk. SERiA 19(4), 92–96.
  8. Jabłoński K., 2013. Poziom plonu rzepaku ozimego i pszenicy ozimej a opłacalność ich produkcji. Rocz. Nauk. SERiA 15(3), 106–112.
  9. Jankowski K., 2000. Wpływ uproszczenia uprawy roli i sposobu regulacji zachwaszczenia na plonowanie i koszt produkcji rzepaku ozimego. Rośl. Oleiste – Oilseed Crops 21, 504–507.
  10. Jankowski K.J., Sokólski M., Dubis B., Krzebietke S., Żarczyński P., Hulanicki P.S., 2016. Yield and quality of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) seeds in response to foliar application of boron. Agr. Food Sci. 25, 164–176.
  11. Jarecki W., Bobrecka-Jamro D., 2008. Reaction of winter rape to the extra feeding of its leaves. Annales UMCS, sec. E, Agricultura 63(2), 86–96.
  12. Jarecki W., Buczek J., Bobrecka-Jamro D., 2019. The response of winter oilseed rape to diverse foliar fertilization. Plant, Soil Environ. 65, 125–130.
  13. Kaur M., Kumar S., Kaur A. 2019. Effect of foliar application of nitrogen, phosphorus and sulphur on growth and yield of Gobhi Sarson (Brassica napus L.) in central Punjab. J. Oilseed Brassi-ca 10(1), 47–50.
  14. Kwaśniewski D., 2008. Economic efficiency of the production of maize, rape and willow. Probl. Inż. Roln. 16, 71–78.
  15. Ma B.L., Biswas D.K., Herath A.W., Whalen J.K., Ruan S.Q., Caldwell C., Earl H., Vanasse A., Scott P., Smith D.L., 2015. Growth, yield, and yield components of canola as affected by nitrogen, sulfur, and boron application. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 178, 658‒670.
  16. Muzalewski A., 2015. Zasady doboru maszyn rolniczych w ramach PROW na lata 2014–2020. Instytut Technologiczno-Przyrodniczy – Oddział w Warszawie, 5–122.
  17. Pużyńska K., Kulig B., Halecki W., Lepiarczyk A., Pużyński S., 2018. Response of oilseed rape leaves to sulfur and boron foliar application. Acta Physiol. Plant. 40, 169–179.
  18. Rosiak E., 2006. Rapeseed market – present state and prospects. Rośl. Oleiste – Oilseed Crops 27, 151–167.
  19. Seta G., Drzewiecki S., Mrówczyński M., 2001. Effectiveness of combined application of insecti-cides and foliar fertilizers in control of some pests in oilseed rape. Rośl. Oleiste – Oilseed Crops 22, 139–146.
  20. Skarżyńska A., 2010. Season of selling potatoes for human consumption in the context of profita-bility of their production. J. Agric. Rural Dev. 2(16), 111–123
  21. Szczepanek M., Bech A., 2019. Technology of winter oilseed rape with foliar fertilization. Acta Sci. Pol. Agricultura 18(1), 39–47.
  22. Szczepanek M., Wilczewski E., Grzybowski K., 2016. Response of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) on soil applied humus preparation and foliar potassium fertilizer. Acta Sci. Pol. Agricultura 15(4), 85–94.
  23. Sztuder H., Kaus A., 2007. Koszty różnych sposobów aplikacji nawozów w uprawie pszenicy ozimej. Inż. Roln. 3(91), 173–178.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.