Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Agronomy Science Baner text

Vol. 75 No. 4 (2020)

Articles

Effect of biological preparations on yield, weed infestation and grain quality of spring spelt wheat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2020.4.5
Submitted: September 17, 2020
Published: 12.11.2020

Abstract

A field experiment conducted at the Experimental Station in Czesławice was aimed at assessing the effect of biological preparations in various combinations on the yield, weed infestation, and grain quality of spring spelt wheat cv. ‘Wirtas’. Single and double spraying treatments with Herbagreen Basic, Bio-algeen S90, and Asahi SL were included, and a control object and an object with full chemical protection. The experiment showed no significant effect of biostimulants on yielding, weed infestation parameters, and potassium and calcium content in spelt wheat grain. In contrast, magnesium and sodium content was significantly higher compared to the objects without the use of biological preparations. The use of chemical field protection resulted in a significant reduction in the number and dry weight of weeds relating to the control object but did not affect the grain yield. Herbagreen Basic, Bio-algeen S90, and Asahi SL can be recommended for spelt wheat cultivation and spelt wheat plants' productivity on objects where biopreparations were used, and full-field protection was similar.

References

  1. Calvo P., Nelson L., Kloepper J.W., 2014. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil. 383(1–2), 3–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8
  2. Celiktopuz E., Kapur B., Sarıdas M.A., Kargı S.P., 2020. Response of strawberry fruit and leaf nutrient concentrations to the application of irrigation levels and a biostimulant. J. Plant Nutr. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1806310
  3. Chen Q., Li Z., Qu Z., Zhou H., Qi Y., Liu Z., Zhang M., 2020. Maize yield and root morphological characteristics affected by controlled-release diammonium phosphate and Paecilomyces variotii extracts. Field Crops Res. 255, 107862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107862
  4. Filipek-Mazur B., Pużyńska K., Tabak M., Pużyński S., 2020. Enzymatic activity of soil under spelt grown in an organic farming system in Poland’s temperate climate. Agronomy 10(7), 930. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10070930
  5. Haliniarz M., Gawęda D., Nowakowicz-Dębek B., Najda A., Chojnacka S., Łukasz J., Wlazło Ł., Różańska-Boczula M., 2020. Evaluation of the weed infestation, grain health, and productivity parameters of two spelt wheat cultivars depending on crop protection intensification and seeding densities. Agriculture 10, 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10060229
  6. Janas R., 2009. Możliwości wykorzystania efektywnych mikroorganizmów w ekologicznych systemach produkcji roślin uprawnych. Probl. Inż. Rol. 3, 111–119.
  7. Jardin P. du, 2012. The science of plant biostimulants – a bibliographic analysis. Contract 30-CE0455515/00-96, ad hoc. Study on biostimulants products. http://hdl.handle.net/2268/169257 [dostęp: 09.09.2020].
  8. Jia C.H., Yu X.J., Zhang M., Liu Z.G., Zou P., Ma J., Xu Y.C., 2019. Application of melatonin enhanced tolerance to high temperature stress in cherry radish (Raphanus sativus L. var. radculus pers). J. Plant Growth Regul. 39, 631–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-10006-1
  9. Kwiatkowski C.A., Haliniarz M., Kołodziej B., Harasim E., Tomczyńska-Mleko M., 2015. Content of some chemical components in carrot (Daucus carota L.) roots depending on growth stimulators and stubble crops. J. Elementol. 20(4), 933–943. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2014.19.4.812
  10. Kwiatkowski C.A., Kołodziej B., Woźniak A., 2013. Yield and quality parameters of carrot (Daucus carrota L.) roots depending on growth stimulators and stubble crops. Acta Sci. Pol., Hort. Cult. 12(5), 55–68.
  11. Kwiatkowski C.A., Yakimovich A., Kołodziej B., Harasim E., 2017. Efektywność biopreparatów w konwencjonalnym i ekologicznym systemie uprawy rumianku pospolitego (Chamomilla recutita L. Rausch). Ann. UMCS, sec. E., Agricultura 72(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2017.1.7
  12. Lamparski R., Kotwica K., Jaskulski D., Piekarczyk M., Wawrzyniak M., 2013. Wpływ stosowania biopreparatów w uprawie pszenicy ozimej na liczebność fitofagicznej entomofauny. Fragm. Agron. 30(3), 108–114.
  13. Łozowicka B., Konecki R., Iwaniuk P., Drągowski W., Rusiłowska J., Pietraszko A., Snarska K., 2019. Wpływ biostymulatora i ochrony herbicydowej na zachwaszczenie oraz parametry ilościowe i jakościowe plonu pszenicy jarej. Prog. Plant Prot. 59(4), 258–264. https://doi.org/10.14199/ppp-2019-034
  14. Maciejewski T., Szukała J., Jarosz A., 2007. Wpływ biostymulatora Asahi SL i Atonik SL na cechy jakościowe bulw ziemniaków. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng. 52(3), 109–112.
  15. Magistrali A., Vavera R., Janovska D., Rempelos L., Cakmak I., Leifert C., Grausgrubere H., Butlera G., Wilkinson A., Bilsborrow P., 2020. Evaluating the effect of agronomic management practices on the performance of differing spelt (Triticum spelta) cultivars in contrasting environments. Field Crops Res. 255, 107869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107869
  16. Michalski T., Duhr E., 2009. Wpływ zaprawiania biostymulatorem Biochikol 020 PC na rozwój i plonowanie dwóch odmian pszenicy jarej. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng. 54(4), 20–25.
  17. Michalski T., Horoszkiewicz-Janka J., 2005. Wpływ bioregulatora Asahi SL na zdrowotność i plonowanie jęczmienia jarego i pszenicy jarej. Prog. Plant Prot. 45(2), 910–913.
  18. Moraes E.R. de, Camargo R. de, Lana R.M.Q., Madeiros M.H., Menezes F.G., Giorgenon E.P., 2020. Yield and biometry of fertilized sugar cane with organomineral fertilizer of sewage sludge and biostimulant. Biosci. J. 36(5), 1564–1576. https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v36n5a2020-42189
  19. Navarro-León E., López-Moreno F.J., Rios J.J., Blasco B., Ruiz J.M., 2020. Assaying the use of sodium thiosulphate as a biostimulant and its effect on cadmium accumulation and tolerance in Brassica oleracea plants. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 200, 110760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110760
  20. Piskier T., 2006. Reakcja pszenicy jarej na stosowanie biostymulatorów i absorbentów glebowych. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng. 51(2), 136–138.
  21. Ricci M., Tilbury L., Daridon B., Sukalac K., 2019. General principles to justify plant biostimulant claims. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 494. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00494
  22. Stępień A., Wojtkowiak K., Skłodowski M., Pietrusewicz M., 2017. Wpływ dolistnego nawożenia Cu, Zn i Mn na wskaźniki jakościowe ziarna i elementy plonowania pszenicy ozimej orkisz (Triticum aestivum ssp. spelta L.). Fragm. Agron. 34(3), 97–108.
  23. Szczepanek M., Wilczewski E., Siwik-Ziomek A., 2017. Effect of a biostimulant on the accumulation of Mg in winter oilseed rape under different mineral fertilization doses. J. Elementol. 22(4), 1375–1385. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2017.22.1.1317
  24. Woropaj-Janczak M., Andrzejewska J., Skinder Z., 2011. Reaction of German chamomile (Chamomilla recutita L. Rauschert) cultivars to biostimulants and foliar fertilisation. Herba Pol. 57(1), 16–26.
  25. Zarzecka K., Mystkowska I., Gugała M., Dołęga H., 2019. Content and uptake of selected macroelements with the yield of potato tubers depending on herbicides and biostimulants. J. Elementol. 24(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2017.22.3.1519

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.