Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Agronomy Science Baner text

Vol. 81 No. 1 (2026)

Articles

Wpływ warunków uprawy na plonowanie i wartość odżywczą fasolnika chińskiego (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) – badania wstępne

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2026.5605
Submitted: September 25, 2025
Published: 27.03.2026

Abstract

Due to the ongoing global warming and the development of breeding work, Chinese cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) may become an attractive crop for cultivation in Central Europe. In Poland, the cultivation of this plant is possible both under cover and in field conditions, especially in the warmer regions of the southern part of the country. However, further scientific research is necessary to adapt cultivation techniques to Poland’s soil and climate conditions and to work on selecting suitable cultivars better adapted to local environmental conditions.
The aim of the research was to evaluate yield and selected morphological traits, as well as the nutritional value of immature pods of two climbing Chinese cowpea cultivars: Fakir and Metro Rouge, grown under field conditions in southern Poland and under cover (high tunnel). The experiment was conducted in 2021–2022 at the experimental station of the University of Agriculture in Kraków.
The results showed that cultivation of cowpeas in a plastic tunnel promoted better plant development and more stable yields compared to field cultivation. The Fakir cultivar performed better in cooler field conditions, entering successive developmental stages more quickly than the Metro Rouge cultivar.
The chemical composition of the pods depended on the cultivation site and genotype – pods from field-grown plants had higher contents of dry matter, fat, vitamin C, phenolic compounds, and higher antioxidant activity, while pods from plants grown under the plastic tunnel contained more protein and pigments. The Fakir cultivar exhibited higher levels of protein and pigments compared to Metro Rouge, whereas Metro Rouge had higher contents of dry matter, ash, vitamin C, and antioxidant activity than Fakir.

References

  1. Abd El-Rahman N., 2018. Effect of different mulching colors and tunnel coverings on plant growth, yield and post-harvest quality of green bean. Egypt. J. Hortic. 45(1), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejoh.2018.3137.1052
  2. Al-Furtuse A.K., Aldoghachi K.A., Jabail W.A., 2019. Response of three varieties of cowpea (Vigna sinensis L.) to different levels of potassium fertilizer under southern region conditions of Iraq. Basrah J. Agric. Sci. 32(S2), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.37077/25200860.2019.254
  3. Babaji B.A., Yahaya R.A., Mahadi M.A. i in. (2011). Growth attributes and pod yield of four cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) varieties as influenced by residual effect of different application rates of farmyard manure. J. Agric. Sci. 3(2), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.5539/JAS.V3N2P165
  4. Bejarano A., Ramírez-Bahena M.H., Velázquez E. i in., 2014. Vigna unguiculata is nodulated in Spain by endosymbionts of Genisteae legumes and by a new symbiovar (vignae) of the genus Bradyrhizobium. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 37(7), 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2014.04.003
  5. Biuletyn IMGW. https://klimat.imgw.pl/pl/biuletyn-monitoring/ [dostęp: 17.11.2025].
  6. Boukar O., Belko N., Chamarthi S. i in., 2019. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata): Genetics, genomics and breeding. Plant Breed. 138, 415–424.
  7. Bralewski T.W., 2009. Fasolnik chiński – ciekawa propozycja. Hasło Ogrod. 10, 122–123.
  8. Carvalho M., Carnide V., Sobreira C. i in., 2022. Cowpea immature pods and grains evaluation: An opportunity for different food sources. Plants 11(16), 2079. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162079
  9. Craufurd P.Q., Ellis R.H., Summerfield R.J. i in., 1996. Development in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). I. The influence of temperature on seed germination and seedling emergence. Exp. Agric. 32(1), 1–12. https://doi.org./10.1017/S0014479700025801
  10. Durau B., 2013. Uprawa mało znanych roślin warzywnych. Wydawnictwa Uczelniane Uniwersytetu Technologiczno-Przyrodniczego w Bydgoszczy, Bydgoszcz.
  11. Faizah A.F., Santoso J., Suryandika F., 2025. Increasing the growth and yield of long bean plants (Vigna sinensis L.) against POC and NPK fertilizers. J. Agron. Tanam. Trop. 7(1), 294–300. https://doi.org/10.36378/juatika.v7i1.4153
  12. Fajriani S., Rahmawan D.S., Ariffin A., 2025. Effectiveness of trellis model and propagation direction in optimizing growth and yield of long bean plants (Vigna sinensis L). J. Agriprec. Soc. Impact 2(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.62793/japsi.v2i1.50
  13. FAOStat (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2017. Statistical data base. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ [dostęp: 17.11.2025].
  14. Gunawan B., Nisak F., Purwanto S. i in., 2022. Increasing productivity long bean plant (Vigna sinensis L. ) with organic vermicompost fertilizer. Agric. Sci. 6(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.55173/AGRISCIENCE.V6I1.78
  15. Hall A.E., 2011. Breeding cowpea for future climates. W: Yadav S.S., Redden R.J., Hatfield J.L. i in. (red.), Crop adaptation to climate change. Wiley-Blackwell, 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470960929.ch24
  16. Lampart-Szczapa E., 1997. Nasiona roślin strączkowych w żywieniu człowieka. Wartość biologiczna i technologiczna. Zesz. Probl. Postęp. Nauk Rol. 446, 61–81.
  17. Osipitan O.A., Fields J.S., Lo S. i in., 2021. Production systems and prospects of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) in the United States. Agronomy 11(11), 2312. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112312
  18. Pardhi S., Sharma R.K., Kushwah S.S. i in., 2022. Influence of varieties and integrated nutrient management practices on growth and yield of seed in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). Legume Res. 45(2), 227–231. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-4475
  19. Sindhuja G., Kiran Patro T.S.K.K., Suneetha S. i in., 2021. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of Yardlong bean (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Ssp. Sesquipedalis Verdc.). Int. J. Chem. Stud., 9(2), 798–801. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2021.v9.i2l.11916
  20. Sombié P.A.E.D., Sama H., Barro A. i in., 2021. The effect of seed size on phytochemical composition in cowpea lines (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) from Burkina Faso. Agric. Sci. 12, 1462–1472. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2021.1212093
  21. Tropical Forages. Vigna unguilata. https://tropicalforages.info/text/entities_app/vigna_unguiculata.htm [dostęp: 17.11.2025].
  22. Nutritional value. Cowpeas, raw, young pods with seeds. https://www.nutritionvalue.org/Cowpeas%2C_raw%2C_young_pods_with_seeds_nutritional_value.html?utm_source=share-by-url [dostęp: 10.06.2025].
  23. Wilson G., 2019. Effect of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) variety and plant spacing on grain and fodder yield. Asian J. Adv. Agric. Res. 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJAAR/2019/V10I130019

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.