Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Agronomy Science Baner text

Vol. 70 No. 1 (2015)

Articles

Preliminary evaluation of variability and stability of maize hybrids yield

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2015.1.3
Submitted: May 9, 2019
Published: 2015-03-10

Abstract

A big number of maize hybrids requires the knowledge on their interaction with the environment before registration. The aim of the paper was to study the variability and yield stability of new experimental maize hybrids based on the experiments carried out in several locations. The material consisted of 25 maize hybrids, including 22 experimental hybrids and three reference varieties MAS 15P, Ricardinio, Lindsey. Hybrids were sown in five locations in Poland in randomized blocks on plots with an area of 15 m2. Evaluation of the variability and stability of the grain yield of the studied hybrids was based on multivariate analysis of variance and on parametric methods: Shukla’s stability variance (σ2), linear regression coefficient (bi) and variance of the regression deviations (S2di) according to Eberhart and Russell and two nonparametric methods: the method of Kang’s parameter and modified method ranks of homogeneous groups and coefficient of variability (RD+V). On the basis of the main effects and the corresponding values of significance levels the studies indicated high-yielding and stable hybrids that did not have any significant interaction with the conditions in different locations. The use of parametric measures allowed us to assess the stability of biological types of hybrids suitable for cultivation in extensive conditions. Intensive hybrids, which responded positively to the improvement of agronomic conditions, were SMH 1856-1304, SMH 1854-1302, KBK 13194, KBK 13196. The highest agricultural stability of the yielding of hybrids was characteristic of SMH 1856-1304 and SMH 1866-1314, which obtained high yields in most locations.

References

  1. Brederkamp J., 1974. Nonparametric Prüfung von Wechsewirkung. Psychol. Beitr. 16, 398–416.
  2. Bujak H., Jedyński S., Kaczmarek J., 2008a. Ocena stabilności plonowania odmian żyta ozimego na podstawie parametrycznych i nieparametrycznych metod. Biul. IHAR 250, 189–201.
  3. Bujak H., Jedyński S., Kaczmarek J., 2008b. Zastosowanie metody rang grup jednorodnych
  4. i współczynnika zmienności do badania stabilności plonowania odmian żyta. Biul. IHAR 250, 217–224.
  5. Bujak H., Nowosad K., Warzecha R., 2014. Evaluation of maize hybrids stability using parametric and nonparametric methods. Maydica 59, 170–175.
  6. Bujak H., Tratwal G., Weber R., Kaczmarek J., Gacek E., 2013. An analysis of spatial similarity in the variability of yields of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars in Western Poland. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 100, 311–316.
  7. Caliński T., 1960. On a certain statistical method of investigating interaction in serial experiments with plant varieties. Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci. 12, 565–568.
  8. Caliński T., Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z., 1987. A model for the analysis of series of experiments re-peated at several places over a period of years. I. Theory. Biul. Oceny Odm. 10, 35–71.
  9. Caliński T., Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z., Krajewski P. Siatkowski I, Pilarczyk W., 2003. Metodyka statystyczna i obsługa programu SERGEN przeznaczonego do analizy doświadczeń odmiano-wych i genetyczno-hodowlanych. Wyd. Instytutu Genetyki Roślin PAN w Poznaniu, Poznań.
  10. De Kroon J., Van der Laan P., 1981. Distribution-free test procedures in two-way layout: a concept of rank-interaction. Stat. Neerl. 35, 189–213.
  11. Eberhart S.A., Russell W.A., 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop. Sci. 6,
  12. –40.
  13. Fan X.M., Kang M.S., Chen H., Zhang Y., Tan J., XU C., 2007. Yield stability of maize hybrids evaluated in multi-environment trials in Yunnan. China Agron. J. 99, 220–228.
  14. Fox P.N., Skovmand B., Thompson B., Braun H.J., Cormier R., 1990. Yield and adaptation of hexaploid spring triticale. Euphytica 47, 57–64.
  15. Hanson W.D., 1970. Genotypic stability. Theor. Appl. Genet. 40, 226–231.
  16. Hildebrand H., 1980. Asymptotische vertailungsfreie Rangtests in linearen Modellen. Med. Inform. Stack. 17, 344–349.
  17. Haufe W., Geidel H., 1984. Vorschlag eines Schätzverfahrens zur Klassifizierung von Versuchser-gebnissen. Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Saatzüchtleiter. A-8952 Irdning, 257–290.
  18. Hopkins A.A., Vogel K.P., Moore K.J., Johnson K.D., Carlson L.T., 1995. Genotype effects and genotype by environment interactions for trait of elite switchgrass populations. Crop Sci. 35, 125–132.
  19. Hühn M., 1990a. Non parametric measures of phenotypic stability. Part. 1. Theory. Euphytica 47, 189–194.
  20. Hühn M., 1990b. Non parametric measures of phenotypic stability. Part. 2. Application. Euphytica 47, 195–201.
  21. Hühn M., 1996. Non parametric analysis of genotype-environment interaction by ranks. In: Kang M.S., Gauch H.S. (ed.), Genotype by environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton,
  22. –271.
  23. Kang M.S., 1988. A rank sum method for selecting high yielding and stable crop genotypes. Cereal Res. Commun. 16, 113–115.
  24. Khan M.H., 2013. Evaluation of maize genotypes for grain yield stability under temperate conditions of Kashmir Valley. Can. J. Plant Breed. 1 (2), 77–79.
  25. Kubinger K.D., 1986. A note on non-parametric tests for the interaction on two-way layouts. Biom-et. J. 28, 67–72.
  26. Lee E. A., Doerksen T.. K., Kannenberg L.W., 2003. Genetic Components of Yield Stability in Maize Breeding Populations. Crop Sci. 43, 6, 2018–2027.
  27. Scapim C.A., Oliveira V.R., Braccini A.L., Cruz C.D., Andrade C.A.B., Vidigal M.C. G., 2000. Yield stability in maize (Zea mays L.) and correlations among the parameters of the Eberhart and Russell, Lin and Binns and Huehn models. Genet. Mol. Biol. 23, 387–393.
  28. Shukla G.K., 1972. Some aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 29, 237–245.
  29. Worku M., Zelleke H., 2008. Genotype x environment interaction and yield stability of maize. East Afr. J. Sci. 2, 7–12.
  30. Wricke G., 1962. Über eine Methode zur Erfassung der ökologischen Streubereite in Feldversuchen. Z. Pflanzenzucht. 47, 92–96.
  31. Yue G.L., Roozemboom K.L., Schapaugh W.T. Jr, Liang G.H., 1997. Evaluation of soybean using parametric and nonparametric stability estimates. Plant Breed. 116, 271–275.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.