Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2011)

Articles

YIELDING AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF „HONEOYE” CULTIVAR STRAWBERRIES DEPENDING ON THE KIND OF SUBSTRATUM AND NITROGEN DOSE

Submitted: January 4, 2021
Published: 2011-03-31

Abstract

Growing strawberries under covers in substrates allows to eliminate the application of soil decontamination, which is costly and harmful for the environment. At the
same time it guarantees obtaining a higher and better quality yield, as compared to the traditional ground cultivations. In the years 2005–2006 studies were conducted, aiming at determining the effect of three kinds of substratum (peat, peat mixed with composted pine bark in the proportion of 1:1, peat mixed with composted pine sawdust in the proportion of 1:1) and differentiated nitrogen dose (140 or 210 mg N·dm-3) upon yielding, chemical composition of leaves and fruit of strawberry (Fragaria × ananasa Duch.) of 'Honeoye' cultivar, grown in an unheated foil tunnel. The total and marketable yield quantity of strawberry fruit grown in peat and in peat with pine bark did not differ significantly. Lower total (407,1 g·plant-1) and marketable fruit yield (264,6 g·plant-1) was reported when plants were grown in peat mixed with sawdust. Plants grown in peat mixed with sawdust gave fruit with significantly lower unit weight compared to plants growing in the
remaining substrates. The studies did not demonstrate a significant effect of differentiated nitrogen fertilization upon strawberry yielding. In the leaves of plants fertilized with nitrogen dose of 200 mg N·dm-3 significantly more nitrogen was found, as well as less calcium, compared to plants fertilized with a smaller dose of this component. In the fruits of strawberry fertilized with a larger nitrogen dose, significantly more nitrates (V), total nitrogen and potassium were reported and less dry matter, extract and calcium compared to fruit collected from plants fertilized with nitrogen dose of 140 mg N·dm-3.

References

Almaliotis D., Velemis D., Bladenopoulou S., Karapetsas N., 2002. Leaf nutrient levels of strawberries (cv.Tudla) in relation to crop yield. Acta Hort., 567, 447–449.
Ao Y., Sun M., Li Y., 2008. Effect of organic substrates on available elemental contents in nutrient solution. Biores. Techn., 99 (11), 5006–5010.
Breś W., Golcz A., Komosa A., Kozik E., Tyksiński W., 2003. Nawożenie roślin ogrodniczych. Wyd. AR Poznań, 147–148.
Darnell R., L., Stutte G., W., 2001. Nitrate concentration effects on NO3-N uptake and reduction, growth and fruit yield in strawberry. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 125, 560–573.
Dorais M., Menard C., Begin G., 2007. Risk of phytotoxicity of sawdust substrates for greenhouse vegetables. Acta Hort., 761, 589–595.
Hatten N., R., Borazjani H., Diehl S., 2005. Leaching of nitrogen phosphorus and potassium from sawdust amended witch chicken litter. Proceedings Mississippi Water Resources Conference, 99–110.
Jarosz Z., Konopińska J., 2006. Plonowanie i skład chemiczny liści truskawki w zależności od rodzaju podłoża i nawożenia azotem. Acta Agrophisica, 7(4), 901–908.
Jarosz Z., Konopińska J., 2010. Effect of substrate types and nitrogen fertilizing on the yielding and chemical composition of strawberry variety 'Elsanta' grown in an unheated tunnel. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 9 (1), 87–96.
Kemppainen R., Avikainen H., Herranen M., Reinikainen O., Tahvonen R., 2004. Plant bioassay for substrates. Acta Hort., 644, 211–215.
Lamarre M., Lareau M.J., 1997. Influence of nitrogen, potassium and magnesium fertilization on day – neutral strawberries in Quebec. Acta Hort., 439, 701–704.
Lieten P., Longuesserre J., Pivot D., 2004. Experiences with substrates, drainage water and recirculation in strawberry culture. Acta Hort., 649, 207–211.
Lopez-Medina J., Peralbo A., Fernandez M.,A., Hernanz D., Toscano G., Hernandez M.,C., Flores F., 2004. Substrate system for production of strawberry fruit in Spain and Mediterranean climates. Proc. of Fifth International Conference on Alternatives to Methyl Bromide, Lisboa, Portugal, 47–51.
MacNaeidhe F., S., 2002. The effect of nutrition on the flavor of strawberries grown under protection. Report Soft Fruit and Beekeeping Research Centre, Clonroche.
Markiewicz B., Golcz A., Kujawski P., 2008. Effect of plant nutritional status on the yield of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) grown in organic substrates. Part I. Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 7(2), 11–20.
Michalski P., Wieniarska J., 2003. Wpływ dokarmiania dolistnego na zawartość składników mineralnych w liściach truskawki. Acta Agrophysica, 85, 209–217.
Nestby R., Lieten F., Pivot D., Raynal Lacroix C., Tagliavini M., Evenhuis B., 2004. Influence of mineral nutrients on strawberry fruit quality and their accumulation in plant organs. Acta Hort., 649, 201–205.
Paranjpe A.,V., Cantliffe D., J., Lamb E.,M., Stoffella P., J., 2003. Winter strawberry production in greenhouses using soilless substrates: an alternative to methyl bromide soli fumigation. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 116, 98–105.
Pudelski T., 1996. Dziś i przyszłość naturalnych podłoży organicznych w uprawach pod osłonami. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln., 429, 1–7.
Pudelski T., 1998. Uprawa warzyw pod osłonami. Pr. zb., PWRiL.
Recamales A.F., Lopez-Medina J., Hernandez D., 2007. Physicochemical characteristics and mineral content of strawberries grown in soil and soilless system. J. Food Qual., 30, 837–852.
Rumpel J., 1998. Tradycyjne i nowe substraty uprawowe oraz problematyka ich stosowania. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln., 461, 47–66.
Simonin S., 2004. Soilless strawberry production. Test of substrates. Arboriculture-Fruitiere, 581, 43–45.
Taghavi T., S., Babalar M., Ebadi A., Ebrahimzadeh H., Asgari M., A., 2004. Effects of nitrate to ammonium ratio on yield and nitrogen metabolism of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa cv. Selva). Int. J. Agri. Biol., 6, 994–997.
Yavari S., Eshghi S., Tafazoli E., Yavari S., 2008. Effects of various organic substrates and nutrient solution on productivity and fruits quality of strawberry Selva (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 16, 167–178.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.