Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
ASPHC Baner

Vol. 19 No. 5 (2020)

Articles

THE EFFECT OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC ACTIVE RADIATION ON YIELD AND QUALITY TRAITS IN ‘TOMBUL’ AND ‘PALAZ’ HAZELNUT CULTIVARS

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2020.5.4
Submitted: April 24, 2019
Published: 2020-10-29

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the changes in yield and some quality characteristics of ‘Tombul’ and ‘Palaz’ hazelnut cultivars according to orchards varied in terms of photosynthetic active radiation. The study was carried out in three orchards with full day sun lighted (100% PAR), half day sun lighted (66.34% PAR) and shady (49.93% PAR) in the Fatsa district of Ordu province (Turkey) in 2016. The experiment was designed in random blocks and three replicates. As a results, it was determined that lighting conditions of the orchards have a significant effect on yield and quality traits in both cultivars. As the sun lighting decreased, yield and good kernel rates decreased; blank nut ratio increased. In addition, the oil content was decreased as the lighting in the orchards increased but it was found to be significant only in ‘Tombul’ hazelnut cultivar. As a result, it may be recommended to take into consideration the natural lighting conditions of the orchards in the new plantations, not to plantation the orchard in places that do not have any sunlight and to apply the cultural practices in existing orchards to get enough light.

References

  1. AOAC (2000a). Official methods of analysis of AOAC international (protein by Kjeldahl nitrogen-method 920.152).
  2. AOAC (2000b). The total fat content was determined in accordance with the method of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists methods total fat by Soxhlet extraction (method 920.39C).
  3. Aydinoglu, A.C. (2010). Examining environmental condition on the growth areas of Turkish hazelnut (Corylus colurna L.). Afr. J. Biotechnol., 9(39), 6492–6502. DOI: 10.5897/AJB10.400
  4. Azarenko, A.N., McCluskey, R.L., Hampson, C.R. (1997). Time of shading influences, yield, nut quality and flowering. Acta Hortic., 445, 179–183. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.445.24
  5. Balık, H.İ., Kayalak Balık, S., Beyhan, N., Erdoğan, V. (2016). Hazelnut Cultivars. Trabzon Commodity Exchange, pp. 96.
  6. Balz, M., Schulte, E., Thier, H.P. (1992). Trennung von Tocopherolen und Tocotrienolen durch HPLC. Eur. J. Lip. Sci. Technol., 94, 209–213 [in German]. DOI: 10.1002/lipi.19920940604
  7. Beyhan, N. (2007). Effects of planting density on yield and quality characteristics of hazelnut (cv. ‘Palaz’) in a hedgerow training system. Can. J. Plant Sci., 87, 595–597. DOI: 10.4141/P05-064
  8. Bostan, S.Z., İslam, A. (1999). Determination of interrelationships among the percentages of pellicle removal and the other important fruit quality characteristics in hazelnuts by path analysis. Turkey III. National Horticultural Congress, 14–17 September, 238–242 [in Turkish].
  9. Bostan, S.Z. (2006). The importance of climate in hazelnut farming. 3. National Hazelnut Council, 10–14 October, Giresun İl Özel İdare Müdürlüğü, Giresun, 422–425 [in Turkish].
  10. Çalış, L. (2010). Effects on yield and quality of different altitudes and vectors in ‘Tombul’ hazelnut cultivars grown in Perşembe district of Ordu MSc. Thesis, Ordu University, Institute of Science, Horticultural Department, Ordu, Turkey [in Turkish].
  11. Çetiner, E., Okay, A.N., Baş, F. (1984). The pre-selection of cultivar and pollinator in round pomological hazelnut group. Sonuç Raporu. Tarım Orman ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı, Proje ve Uygulamaları Genel Müdürlüğü, Fındık Araştırma ve Eğitim Merkezi Müdürlüğü, Giresun [in Turkish].
  12. Hampson, C.R., Azarenko, A.N., Potter, J.R. (1996). Photosynthetic rate, flowering and yield component alteration in hazelnut in response to different light environments. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 121(6), 1103–1111.
  13. Karadeniz, T., Küp, M. (1997). The effects on quality hazelnut of direction. Acta Hortic., 445, 285–291. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.445.38
  14. Kaşka, N., Paydaş Kargı, S. (2007). Fruit trees physiology growth and development (Translation). Nobel Kitabevi, pp. 243 [in Turkish].
  15. Lagerstedt, H.B. (1975). Filberts. In: Advances in Fruit Breeding, Janick, J., Moore, J.N. (eds.). Purdue Univ. Press. West Lafayette, Ind., USA, 456–489.
  16. Me, G., Valentini, N., Caviglione, M., Lovisolo, C. (2005). Effect of shade on flowering and yield for two different hazelnut training systems. Acta Hortic., 686, 187–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.686.25
  17. Mehlenbacher, S.A., Smith, D.C. (1988). Heritability of ease of hazelnut pellicle removal. HortScience, 23(6), 1053–1054.
  18. Özçağıran, R., Ünal, A., Özeker, E., İsfendiyaroğlu, M. (2014). Temperate Zone Fruits. Ege Üniversitesi Basım Evi, İzmir, pp. 262 [in Turkish].
  19. Roversi, A., Malvicini, G.L. (2014). Effects of manual pruning on hazelnut yield and fruit quality. Acta Hortic., 1052, 175–178. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1052.22
  20. Şahin, İ., Erkut, A., Öztek, L., Üstün, Ş., Oysun, G. (1990). Researches on technological traits of hazelnut cultivars grown in the Middle and East Black Sea region. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Yayınları, 63, Samsun, pp. 54 [in Turkish].
  21. Thompson, M.M., Lagerstedt, H.B., Mehlenbacher, S.A. (1996). Hazelnuts. In: Fruit Breeding, Janick, J., Moore, J.N. (eds.). Vol. 3, Wiley, New York, 125–184.
  22. Tombesi, A. (1977). Effect of light penetration on high-density filbert planting. Institute of Fruit Culture, University of Perugia, Italy. Estratto dagli Annali, Vol. 32–33, 301–310.
  23. Valentini, N., Caviglione, M., Ponso, A., Lovisolo, C., Me, G. (2009). Physiological aspects of hazelnut trees grown in different training systems. Acta Hortic., 845, 233–238. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.845.32

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.