Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 24 No. 3 (2025)

Articles

Effect of different sowing times, plant densities, and fertiliser doses on yield and crop elements of dry bean varieties (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2025.5427
Submitted: September 8, 2024
Published: 30.06.2025

Abstract

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is the most widely consumed grain legume in Europe, yet dry bean production in Hungary remains below domestic demand. This study aimed to identify optimal cultivation strategies for improving yield by evaluating the combined effects of sowing time, plant density, and fertiliser dose across three dry bean varieties under field conditions in Nyíregyháza (Hungary) from 2015 to 2017. The results revealed that all three agronomic factors significantly influenced yield and its components, with varietal differences in response patterns. Sowing time and plant density consistently affected pod number, thousand-seed weight, and yield per plant. Fertiliser application had a more variable impact, depending on the variety and year. The findings underline the importance of variety-specific recommendations to optimise yield under varying environmental and soil conditions.

References

  1. Ahmed, N., Razaq, M., Salahuddin, H.A. (2016). Response of french bean cultivars to plant spacing under agroclimatic condition of Baffa. J. Northeast Agric. Univ. (English Ed.), 23(1), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-8104(16)30027-7
  2. Antal, J. (1983). Növénytermesztők zsebkönyve [Plant Growers’ Pocket Book]. Mezőgazdasági Kiadó, Budapest.
  3. Bakure, S., Tarekegn, Y., Ejigu, D. (2023). Effect of interrow spacings on growth, yield, and yield components of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Adv. Agric. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7434012
  4. Balláné Kovács, A. (2011). A nitrogén- és kéntrágyázás hatása a zöldbab (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) termésére és tápelem összetételére. [The effect of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization on the yield and nutrient composition of french beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)]. Növénytermelés, 60(4), 27–42.
  5. Bayrak, I.H., Ipekesen, S., Bicer, B.T. (2022). Determination of the effect of different sowing dates on growth and yield parameters of some dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties. J. Agron. Technol. Eng. Manag., 5(3), 732–739. https://doi.org/10.55817/GMKS4054
  6. Begum, A., Ahad, A., Kaisar, M.O., Islam, M.M., Anam, M.K. (2003). Effect of sowing dates and fertilizer treatments on the reproductive variability of french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Pakistan J. Biol. Sci., 6, 1897–1901. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2003.1897.1901
  7. Fageria, N.K., Baligar, V.C. (2016). Growth, yield and yield components of dry bean as influenced by phosphorus in a tropical acid soil. J. Plant Nutr., 39(4), 562–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2016.1143489
  8. Fageria, N.K., Filho, M.P.B., Costa, J.G.C. (2001). Potassium-use efficiency in common bean genotypes. J. Plant Nutr., 24(12), 1937–1945. https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-100107605
  9. Fageria, N.K., Melo, L.C., Oliveira, J. (2013). Nitrogen use efficiency in dry bean genotypes. J. Plant Nutr., (36)14, 2179–2190. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2013.836225
  10. Faria, J.C., Fageria, N.K. (2014). Genetically modified and conventional dry bean genotype responses to soil fertility. J. Plant Nutr., (37)4, 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2013.867976
  11. Hadnagy, Á. (1981). Bab [Beans]. In: A szántóföldi növények vetőmagtermesztése és fajtahasználata [Seed production and variety use of field crops]. Szabó, J. (eds). Mezőgazdasági Kiadó, Budapest, 374–393.
  12. IUSS Working Group WRB (2022). World Reference Base for Soil Resources. International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps, 4th ed.; International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS), Vienna, Austria.
  13. Jan, I.A., Taj, F.H., Khan, I.A., Khan, N. (2002). Effect of sowing dates on yield and yield components of Mashbean varieties. Asian J. Plant Sci., 1, 622–624. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2002.622.624
  14. Kádár, I. (2005). A műtrágyázás hatása a bab (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) termésére és elemfelvételére [The impact of fertilization on the yield and nutrient absorption of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)]. Agrokémia és Talajtan, 54(1–2), 93–104.
  15. Kádár, I. (2013). A kálium, bór és a stroncium kezelés hatása a bab (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) elemfelvételére [The impact of potassum, boron, and strontium fertilization on the nutrient absorption of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)]. Növénytermelés, 62(4), 37–52.
  16. Karavidas, I., Ntatsi, G., Vougeleka, V., Karkanis, A., Ntanasi, T., Saitanis, C., Agathokleous, E., Ropokis, A., Sabatino, L., Tran, F., Iannetta, P.P.M., Savvas, D. (2022). Agronomic practices to increase the yield and quality of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). A systematic review. Agronomy, 12(2), 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020271
  17. Mbeke, A.M., Kirui, S.C., Kibet, N.C., Welinga, A.M., Musyoki, S.K., Nguta, C.M. (2014). Effects of nitrogen application on snap beans production in Koibatek district Kenya. Int. J. Dev. Sustain., 3(5), 1013–1025. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279749569_Effects_of_Nitrogen_application_on_snap_beans_production_in_Koibatek_district_Kenya [date of access: 3.08.2020].
  18. McCormack, J.H. (2004). Bean seed production. An organic seed production manual for seed growers in the Mid-Atlantic and Southern U.S. Available:
  19. http://www.carolinafarmstewards.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/BeanSeedProductionVer_1pt4.pdf [date of access: 2015].
  20. McKenzie, R.H., Middleton, A.B., Seward, K.W., Gaudiel, R., Wildschut, C., Bremer, E. (2001). Fertilizer responses of dry bean in southern Alberta. Canad. J. Plant Sci., 81(2), 343–350. http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.4141/P00-106
  21. Mehmet, O.Z. (2008). Nitrogen rate and plant population effects on yield and yield components in soybean. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 7(24), 4464–4470. Available: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajb/article/view/59616 [date of access: 17.01.2024].
  22. Mekonnen, S.A., Katiyar, T.P.S., Ravishankar, H. (2012). Yield components and yield of haricot bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under different irrigation frequency and planting density treatments. Afr. J. Plant Sci. Biotechnol., 6(1), 13–20. Available: http://www.globalsciencebooks.info/Online/GSBOnline/images/2012/AJPSB_6(SI1)/AJPSB_6(SI1)13-20o.pdf [date of access: 8.02.2017].
  23. Mirzaienasab, M., Mojaddam, M. (2014). The effect of planting date on yield and yield components of two red bean cultivars in Azna weather conditions. Ind. J. Fund. Appl. Life Sci. 4(3), 417–422. Available:
  24. https://www.cibtech.org/J-LIFE-SCIENCES/PUBLICATIONS/2014/Vol-4-No-3/JLS-060-069-MANI-THE-CONDITIONS.pdf [date of access: 15.01.2024].
  25. Moniruzzaman, M., Halim, G.M.A., Firoz, Z.A. (2009). Performances of French bean as influenced by plant density and nitrogen application. Bangladesh J. Agril. Res., 34(1), 105–111. https://doi.org.10.3329/bjar.v34i1.5760
  26. Ovacikli, E., Tolay, I. (2020). Morpho-agronomic and cooking quality of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown under different nitrogen sources and nitrogen levels. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 18, 8343–8354. http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1806_83438354
  27. Pawar, S.U., Awari, H., Kharwade, M.L. (2007). Effect of plant density on vegetative growth and yield performance of different varieties of french bean under irrigated condition. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 20(3) 684–685. Available: http://14.139.155.167/test5/index.php/kjas/article/viewFile/1008/1000 [date of access: 31.01.2017].
  28. Prasad, P.V.V., Boote, K.J., Allen, L.H., Thomas, J.M.G. (2002). Effects of elevated temperature and carbon dioxide on seed-set and yield of kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Glob. Change Biol., 8(8), 710–721. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00508.x
  29. Samago, T.Y., Anniye, E.W., Dakora, F.D. (2018). Grain yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties is markedly increased by rhizobial inoculation and phosphorus application in Ethiopia. Symbiosis 75, 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-017-0529-9
  30. Seif, Y.I.A., El-Miniawy, S., El-Din M., El-Azm, N.A.I.A., Hegazi, A.Z. (2016). Response of snap bean growth and seed yield to seed size, plant density and foliar application with algae extract. Ann. Agric. Sci., 61(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2016.09.001
  31. Shirtliffe, S.J., Johnston, A.M. (2002). Yield density relationships and optimum plant populations in two cultivars of solid-seeding dry bean grown in Saskatchewan. Can. J. Plant Sci., 82(3), 521–529. https://doi.org/10.4141/P01-156
  32. Shiv Kumar, S.K., Mishra, S.N., (2002). Effect of intergenotypic competition on yield assessment at different spacings in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed., 62(1), 38–41. Available: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20023054120 [date of access: 2024].
  33. Shubhashree, K.S., Alagundagi, S.C., Hiremath, S.M., Chittapur, B.M., Hebsur, N.S., Patil, B.C. (2011). Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium levels on growth, yield and economics of rajmash (Phaseolus vulgaris). Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 24. 3: 283–285. http://14.139.155.167/test5/index.php/kjas/article/viewFile/5249/5474 [date of access: 5.08.2020].
  34. Soratto, R.P., Catuchi, T.A., Souza, E.F.C., Garcia, J.L.N. (2017). Plant density and Nitrogen fertilization on common bean nutrition and yield. Rev. Caatinga 30(3), 670–678. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252017v30n315rc
  35. Sreelatha, D., Rao, K. L., Veeraraghavaiah, R., Padmaja, M. (1997). Physiological variations in French bean cultivars as affected by sowing dates. Ann. Agric. Res. 18, 111–114.
  36. Teferi, M.F., Tesfaye, B., Woldemichael, A., Debella, A. (2022). Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) response to deficit irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer and relationships between yield, yield component, and protein content. Int. J. Agron., 1, 4148983. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4148983
  37. Tuarira, M., Moses, M. (2014). Effects of plant density and planting arrangement in green bean seed production. J. Glob. Innov. Agric. Soc. Sci. 2(4), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.17957/JGIASS/2.4.516
  38. Turuko, M., Mohammed, A. (2014). Effect of different phosphorus fertilizer rates on growth, dry matter yield and yield components of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). World J. Agric. Res., 2(3), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.12691/wjar-2-3-1
  39. Uddin, F.M.J., Kashem, Md.A., Islam, A.K.M.M., Sarkar, Md.A.R. (2017). Optimizing sowing date for French bean varieties under Bangladesh condition. Ann. Res. Rev. Biol. 21(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.9734/ARRB/2017/38096
  40. Velich, I., (1994). Bokor- és karósbab. [Bush and haricot beans]. In: Zöldségtermesztők Kézikönyve. Balázs, S. (ed.), Mezőgazda Kiadó, Budapest 375.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.