Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
ASPHC Baner

Tom 18 Nr 4 (2019)

Artykuły

Influence of nano-silica and humic acid on physiological characteristics of Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon L.) under salinity stress

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2019.4.19
Przesłane: 25 lipca 2019
Opublikowane: 2019-08-07

Abstrakt

This research was conducted to evaluate the effects of water salinity and nano-silica (NS) and humic acid (HA) on Bermuda grass. The study was carried out under greenhouse and exterior space conditions in a completely randomized design with factorial arrangements. Treatments included 4 water salinity levels (0, 5, 7 and 9 dS/m) and 4 level of NS (0, 1, 2 and 3 mm/l) as well as 4 level of HA (0, 50, 100 and 150 mg/l). Results indicated a decrease in chlorophyll content, and increase in proline, malondialdehyde (MDA), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and electrolyte leakage (EL) with increasing levels of salinity. The chlorophyll content in greenhouse and exterior space also increased with increasing levels of NS and HA, while proline in two environments, with increasing levels of NS and HA decreased. EL with increasing levels of NS fluctuated, but with increasing levels of HA, it decreased in two environments. With increasing levels of NS, CAT in both environments was eventually decreased after the oscillation, but there was no particular trend in HA levels. With increasing levels of NS and HA, MDA in the greenhouse decreased and in the exterior space – it increased. Finally, by increasing levels of NS and HA, SOD did not show any change in the greenhouse condition, but in the exterior space, the SOD was decreased.

Bibliografia

  1. Aebi, H. (1984). Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol., 105, 121–126.
  2. Agarie, S., Uchida, H., Agata, W., Kaufman, P.B. (1999). Effects of silicon on stomatal blue-light response
  3. in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Prod. Sci., 2(4), 232–234.
  4. Al-aghabary, K., Zhu, Z., Shi, Q. (2005). Influence of silicon supply on chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence, and antioxidative enzyme activities in tomato plants under salt stress. J. Plant Nutr., 27(12), 2101–2115.
  5. Amirjani, M.R. (2011). Effect of salinity stress on growth, sugar content, pigments and enzyme activity of rice. Int. J. Bot., 7(1), 73–81.
  6. Ashraf, M., Foolad, M. (2007). Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ. Exp. Bot., 59(2), 206–216.
  7. Bates, L.S., Waldren, R.P., Teare, I.D. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39(1), 205–207.
  8. Beauchamp, C., Fridovich, I. (1971). Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem., 44(1), 276–287.
  9. Benavídes, M.P., Marconi, P.L., Gallego, S.M., Comba, M.E., Tomaro, M.L. (2000). Relationship between antioxidant defence systems and salt tolerance in Solanum tuberosum. Funct. Plant Biol., 27(3), 273–278.
  10. Bian, S., Jiang, Y. (2009). Reactive oxygen species, antioxidant enzyme activities and gene expression patterns in leaves and roots of Kentucky bluegrass in response to drought stress and recovery. Sci. Hortic., 120(2), 264–270.
  11. Biglari, F., Hadad, R., Sotude, A. (2012). Assessment of silica treatments on glycine changes and catalase, in rice, in drought stress. Second conference of plant physiology, Tehran, Iran.
  12. DaCosta, M., Huang, B. (2007). Changes in antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation for bentgrass species in response to drought stress. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 132(3), 319–326.
  13. Esmaili, S., Salehi, H. (2012). Effects of temperature and photoperiod on postponing bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L.) turf dormancy. J. Plant Physiol., 169(9), 851–858.
  14. Flowers, T.J., Troke, P.F., Yeo, A.R. (1977). The mechanism of salt tolerance in halophytes. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 28(1), 89–121.
  15. Karimi, J., Mohsenzadeh, S. (2016). Effects of silicon oxide nanoparticles on growth and physiology of wheat seedlings. Rus. J. Plant Physiol., 63(1), 119–123.
  16. Mane, A.V., Deshpande, T.V., Wagh, V.B., Karadge, B.A., Samant, J.S. (2011). A critical review on physiological changes associated with reference to salinity. Int. J. Environ. Sci., 1(6), 1192–1216.
  17. Marcum, K.B. (1999). Salinity tolerance mechanisms of grasses in the subfamily Chloridoideae. Crop Sci., 39(4), 1153–1160.
  18. Neri, D., Lodolini, E.M., Savini, G., Sabbatini, P., Bonanomi, G., Zucconi, F. (2002). Foliar application of humic acids on strawberry (cv. Onda). Acta Hortic., 594, 297–302.
  19. ParvaziShandi, S., Pazoki, A., Asgharzadeh, A., Azadi, A. (2013). The effect of irrigation, growth promoting bacteria and humic acid on yield and yield components of wheat. Sust. Agri., 18(3), 1–8 (in Farsi).
  20. Shalata, A., Mittova, V., Volokita, M., Guy, M., Tal, M. (2001). Response of the cultivated tomato and its wild salt‐tolerant relative Lycopersicon pennellii to salt‐dependent oxidative stress: The root antioxidative system. Physiol. Plant., 112(4), 487–494.
  21. Siddiqui, M.H., Al-Whaibi, M.H. (2014). Role of nano-SiO2 in germination of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.). Saud. J. Biol. Sci., 21(1), 13–17.
  22. Stewart, R.R., Bewley, J.D. (1980). Lipid peroxidation associated with accelerated aging of soybean axes. Plant Physiol., 65(2), 245–248.
  23. Strain, H.H., Svec, W.A. (1966). Extraction, separation, estimation, and isolation of the chlorophylls. Chlorophylls, 21–66.
  24. Uddin, M.K., Juraimi, A.S., Hossain, M.A., Anwar, F., Alam, M.A. (2012). Effect of salt stress of Portulaca oleracea on antioxidant properties and mineral compositions. Aus. J. Crop Sci., 6, 1732–1736.
  25. Vaughan, D., Malcolm, R. E. (1979). Effect of humic acid on invertase synthesis in roots of higher plants. Soil Biol. Biochem., 11(3), 247–252.
  26. Zhang, Q., Rue, K., Wang, S. (2012). Salinity effect on seed germination and growth of two warm-season native grass species. Hortic. Sci., 47(4), 527–530.
  27. Zhu, J.K. (2003). Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Cur. Opin. Plant Biol., 6(5), 441–445.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

<< < 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.