THE INFLUENCE OF HARVESTING APPLIED AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF PLANT DEVELOPMENT ON Hyssopus officinalis L. PRODUCTION

Mustafa Can

Agriculture and Forestry Provincial Directorate, Uşak,
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1533-7039

Nimet Katar

Agriculture and Forestry Provincial Directorate, 26160, Eskişehir, Turkey
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0699-167X

Duran Katar

Department of Field Crops, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, 26160, Eskişehir, Turkey
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1340-8040


Abstract

The yield and quality traits of hyssop (Hyssopus officinalis L.) depending on the plant developmental phases were investigated under Turkey’s Eskisehir ecological conditions in 2019 and 2020. The experiment were conducted in randomized complete block design with 3 replications. The developmental stages examined were before-flowering, beginning of flowering, full flowering and after flowering stage. The effect of harvest times on examined all parameters was very significant (p ≤ 0.05). The maximum yields of fresh herb and dry leaf + flower were obtained from after-flowering stage. However, no significant difference was observed between full flowering and after-flowering period for dry leaf + flower yield. On the other hand, the essential oil content (0.93%) and essential oil yield (24.01 L ha–1) in the full flowering stage were found to be higher. The main components of hyssop essential oil were as follows: pinocamphone (38.41–41.85%), isopinocamphone (22.73–22.99%) and β-pinene (7.92–8.94%). Maximum pinocamphone content was observed in the before-flowering period. To harvesting in full flowering of hyssop plant can be a reasonable strategy in terms of high dry leaf + flower yield, essential oil content and yield.

Keywords:

hyssop, harvest times, isopinocamphone, ontogenetic variability, pinocamphone

Acimovic, M., Pezo, L., Zeremski, T., Loncar, B., Marjanovic Jeromela, A., Stankovic Jeremic, J., Cvetkovic, M., Sikora, V., Ignjatov, M. (2021). Weather conditions influence on hyssop essential oil quality. Processes 9, 1152. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071152

Aghaei, K., Pirbalouti, A.G., Mousavi, A., Badi, H.N., Mehnatkesh, A. (2019). Effects of foliar spraying of L-phenylalanine and application of bio-fertilizers on growth, yield, and essential oil of hyssop [Hyssopus officinalis L. subsp. Angustifolius (Bieb.)]. Biocat. Agric. Biotech., 21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101318

Badi, H.N., Yazdani, D., Ali, S.M., Nazari, F. (2004). Effects of spacing and harvesting time on herbage yield and quality/quantity of oil in thyme, Thymus vulgaris L. Ind. Crops Prod., 19(3), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2003.10.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2003.10.005

Can, M., Katar, N., Katar, D. (2021). Effect of ontogenetic and diurnal variabilities on essential oil content and composition of Turkish oregano (Origanum onites L.). J. Agric. Fac. Bursa Uludag Univ., 35(1), 1–12. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1115835

Dudai, N. (2005). Factors affecting content and composition of essential oils in aromatic plants. In: Crops growth, quality and biotechnology, Dris R (ed.). Part III: Quality management of food grops for processing technology. WFL Publisher, Helsinki, 77–90.

Fatemeh, F., Mazandarani, M., Hamedeyazdan, S. (2011). Phytochemical analysis and antioxidant activity of Hyssopus officinalis L. from Iran. Adv. Pharm.l Bull., 1(2), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.5681/apb.2011.009

ISO (2007). Oil of hyssop Hyssopus officinalis L. ssp. officinalis, 2nd ed. International Organisation for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland.

Jankovsky, M., Landa, T. (2002). Genus hyssopus L. – recentkKnowledge. Hort. Sci., 29, 19–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/4474-HORTSCI DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/4474-HORTSCI

Karaca Oner, E., Sonkaya, M. (2020). Identification of ontogenetic and diurnal variability in oregano (Origanum onites L.). Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca, 48(3), 1185–1193. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha48311842 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha48311842

Katar, N., Katar, D., Yildiz, E. (2021). Determination of the effect of different drying times on yield and essential oil content of hyssop (Hyssopus officinalis) plant. Biol. Div. Conserv., 14(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2003.10.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46309/biodicon.2021.743654

Kaya, D., Inan, M., Giray, E.S., Kirici, S. (2012). Diurnal, ontogenetic and morphogenetic variability of Lavandula stoechas L. ssp. stoechas in East Mediterranean Region. Rev. Chim. (Bucharest Rom.), 63, 749–753. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Memet-Inan/publication/298411632_Diurnal_Ontogenetic_and_Morphogenetic_Variability_of_Lavandula_stoechas_L_ssp_stoechas_in_East_Mediterranean_Region/links/587895d208ae8fce49324e15/Diurnal-Ontogenetic-and-Morphogenetic-Variability-of-Lavandula-stoechas-L-ssp-stoechas-in-East-Mediterranean-Region.pdf

Kotyuk, L. (2015). Hyssop composition depending on age and plants development phases. Biotechnol. Acta, 8(5), 55–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/biotech8.05.055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/biotech8.05.055

Kurkcuoglu, M., Eser, S.A., Baser, K.H.C. (2016). Composition of the essential oil of the Hyssopus officinalis L. subsp. angustifolius (Bieb.) Arcangeli. Nat. Vol. Essent. Oils, 3(2), 15–19. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/226660

Moghtader, M. (2014). Comparative evaluation of the essential oil composition from the leaves and flowers of Hyssopus officinalis L. J. Hortic. For., 6(1), 1–5. https:/doi.org/10.5897/JHF2013.0318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JHF2013.0318

Moro, A., Zalacain, A., Mendoza, J., Delgado, M. (2011). Effects of agronomic practices on volatile composition of Hyssopus officinalis L. essential oils. Molecules, 16, 4131–4139. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules16054131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16054131

Németh, E. (2005). Changes in essential oil quantity and quality influenced by ontogenetic factors. Acta Hortic., 675, 159–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.675.23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.675.23

Nurzyńska-Wierdak, R. (2009). Herb yield and chemical composition of common oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) essential oil according to the plant’s developmental stage. Herba Pol., 55(3), 55–62.

Ozyazici, G., Kevseroglu, K. (2019). Effects of ontogenetic variability on yield of some Labiatae family (Mentha spicata L., Origanum onites L., Melissa officinalis L., Lavandula angustifolia Mill.) plants. Turkish J. Agric. Res., 6, 174–185. https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.510877 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.510877

Pfefferkorn, A., Kruger, H., Pank, F. (2008). Chemical composition of Satureja hortensis L. essential oils depending on ontogenetic stage and season. J. Essent. Oil Res., 20, 303–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2008.9700018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2008.9700018

Rey, C., Carron, C.A., Cottagnoud, A., Bruttin, B., Carlen, C. (2004). The hyssop (Hyssopus officinalis) cultivar ‘Perlay’. Rev. Suisse Vitic. Arboric. Hortic., 36(6), 337–341.

Roslon, W., Osinska, E., Weglarz, Z. (2002). Evaluation of three species of Hyssopus genus with respect to their development as well as essentials oil content and its composition. Folia Hortic., 14(2),145–151.

Sourestani, M.M., Malekzadeh, M., Tava, A. (2014). Influence of drying, storage and distillation times on essential oil yield and composition of anise hyssop [Agastache foeniculum (Pursh.) Kuntze]. J. Essent. Oil Res., 26(3), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2014.882274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2014.882274

Tavakoli, M., Aghajani, Z. (2016). The effects of drought stress on the components of the essential oil of Hyssopus officinalis L. and determining the antioxidative properties of its water extracts. J. Appl. Envir. Biolog. Sci., 6(2), 31–36. Available: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1085.1236&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Yesil, M., Ozcan, M.M. (2021). Effects of harvest stage and diurnal variability on yield and essential oil contentin Mentha × piperita L. Plant Soil Environ., 67, 417–423. https://doi.org/10.17221/114/2021-PSE DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/114/2021-PSE

Download

Published
2022-06-30



Mustafa Can 
Agriculture and Forestry Provincial Directorate, Uşak, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1533-7039
Nimet Katar 
Agriculture and Forestry Provincial Directorate, 26160, Eskişehir, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0699-167X
Duran Katar 
Department of Field Crops, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, 26160, Eskişehir, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1340-8040



License

 

Articles are made available under the conditions CC BY 4.0 (until 2020 under the conditions CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Submission of the paper implies that it has not been published previously, that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

The author signs a statement of the originality of the work, the contribution of individuals, and source of funding.