A comparative study on the fattening ability, slaughter traits and meat quality of the Danube White Breed and its crosses
Apostol Apostolov
Agricultural Institute, Simeon Veliki 3, 9700 Shumen, BulgariaRadka Nedeva
Agricultural Institute, Simeon Veliki 3, 9700 Shumen, BulgariaBogdan Szostak
University of Life Sciences in LublinElena Gineva
Poland Agricultural Experimental Station – Yambol, BulgariaAbstrakt
The Danube White is a genuine, contemporary breed of pigs in Bulgaria. It came into being in the basin of the Danube but research related to its appearance and improvement was
conducted at the Agricultural Institute in Shumen. The breed was obtained as a result of many crossing variants of the Bulgarian White, Large White, Landrace, Hampshire and Pietrain pigs, as well as one synthetic line. The obtained population of animals was exposed to high selection and careful assortment of the parental couple. A scientific experiment comprising 21 pigs, divided into two groups, was carried out. The groups had the following origin: Ist group – pure-bred pigs from the Danube White breed (DW), IInd group – crosses [♀ DW × ♂(LW × L)] of the Danube White sows mated by boars crosses of the breeds Large White (LW) × Landrace (L) of English origin. The slaughter characteristics of carcass established higher meat content in the crosses’ carcass compared to the pure-bred pigs. The measurements of the right half found that this superiority was connected with a higher percentage of meat 4.36% (P ≤ 0.05) and less backfat 799 g (P ≤ 0.01). The same trend was established with regard to the separate parts of the half carcass, where the meat content of the chest part is higher by 84 g and the backfat is less by 462 g (P ≤ 0.01). The measurements in the waist part show a significantly lower fat content in the crosses 363 g (P ≤ 0.01). The meat quality of the animals of both origins has a high content of intramuscular fat and optimal processing opportunity.
Słowa kluczowe:
pigs, fattening ability, slaughter traits, meat qualityBibliografia
Apostolov A., 2010. Influence of some genetic and environmental factors on the productivity of Danube White pigs. I. Study on the effect of blood introduction in boars with similar genotypes. Slovak J. Anim. Sci., 43 (1), 13–16.
Blanchard P., Ellis M., Warkup C., Hardy B., J. Chadwick, Deans G., 1999. The influence of rate of lean and fat tissue development on pork eating quality. Anim. Sci. 68, 477–485.
Brocks, L., Hulsegge B., G. Merkus G., 1998. Histochemical characteristics in relation to meat quality properties in the longissimus lumborum of fast and lean growing lines of Large White
pigs. Meat Sci. 50, 411–420.
Cameron, N. D., Nute G. R., Brown S. N., Enser M., Wood J. D., 1999. Meat quality of Large White pig genotypes selected for components of efficient lean growth rate. Anim. Sci. 68, 115–127.
Castell A., Cliplef R., Poste-Flin L., Butler G., 1994. Performance, carcass and pork characteristics of castrates and gilts self–fed diets differing in protein content and lysine, energy ratio. Canadian J. Anim. Sci. 74, 519–528.
Daszkiewicz T., Bąk T., Denaburski J., 2005. Quality of pork with a different intramuscular fat (IMF) content. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 14, 31–36.
Esse´n-Gustavsson B., Jensen-Waern M., 1993. Muscle characteristics and metabolic response at slaughter in domestic pigs reared either outdoors or indoors. Page 67 in Proc. 39th Int. Cong.
of Meat Sci. and Technol., Calgary, Canada.
Falkowski T., Pisula A., Słowiński M., Orzechowska B., 2006. Processing suitability of pork from different breeds reared in Poland. Acta Sci. Pol., Technologia Alimentaria 5(2), 55–64.
Goerl K., Eilert S., Mandigo R., Chen H., Miller P., 1995. Pork characteristics as affected by two populations of swine and six crude protein levels. J. Anim. Sci. 73, 3621–3626.
Karlsson A., Esse´n-Gustavsson B., Lundstro’m K., 1994. Muscle glycogen depletion pattern in halothane-gene-free pigs at slaughter and its relation to meat quality. Meat Sci. 38, 91–101.
Krasnowska G., Salejda A., 2008. The quality of pork from various pig genetic lines. III Baltic Conference on Food Science and Technology „Foodbalt 2008”, 144–147.
Kulisiewicz J., Sokół J.L., Rekiel A., Iniarski R., Lenartowicz P., 1995. Growth rate and carcass value of three types of crossbred pigs fed ad libitum diets with different protein and energy
contents. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 4,11–19.
Lonergan S.M., Huff-Lonergan E., Rowe L.J., Kuhlers D.L., Jungst S.B., 2001. Selection for lean growth efficiency in Duroc pigs influences pork quality. J. Anim. Sci. 79, 2075–2085.
Nakev Z., Apostolov A., Slanev S., 2009. A comparative study on the slaughter traits and quality of pork from the breed Landrace, Danube white, and their reciprocal crosses. J. Anim. Sci.
(BG) 2, 14–18.
Petersen J. S., Henckel P., Maribo H., Oksbjerg N., Sorensen M. T., 1997. Muscle metabolism, post mortem pH-decline and meat quality in pigs subjected to regular physical training and
spontaneous activity. Meat Sci. 46,259–275.
Petersen J.S., Henckel P., Oksbjerg N., Sorensen M.T., 1998. Adaptations in muscle fiber characteristics induced by physical activity in pigs. Anim. Sci. 66, 733–740.
Ruusunen M., Puolanne E., 1997. Comparison of histochemical properties of different pig breeds. Meat Sci. 45, 119–125.
Szostak B., Apostolov A., Slanev S., 2004. A note on the Bulgarian Danube White pig – reproduction, fattening and slaughter indicators. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 22, 259–265.
Agricultural Institute, Simeon Veliki 3, 9700 Shumen, Bulgaria
Agricultural Institute, Simeon Veliki 3, 9700 Shumen, Bulgaria
University of Life Sciences in Lublin
Poland Agricultural Experimental Station – Yambol, Bulgaria
Licencja
Od 2022 r. artykuły są udostępniane na zasadach licencji Creative Commons uznanie autorstwa 4.0 międzynarodowa (CC BY 4.0). Artykuły opublikowane przed 2022 r. są dostępne na zasadach licencji Creative Commons uznanie autorstwa – użycie niekomercyjne – bez utworów zależnych 4.0 międzynarodowa (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Przysłanie artykułu do redakcji oznacza, że nie był on opublikowany wcześniej, nie jest rozpatrywany do publikacji w innych wydawnictwach.
Autor podpisuje oświadczenie o oryginalności dzieła i wkładzie poszczególnych osób.
