Abstrakt
The objective of the study was to determine the yields and forage value of permanent grasslands – meadow and pasture – and of grass leys– used either as hay or for grazing. Fivecomponent mixtures with meadow fescue (40%), perennial ryegrass (30%), timothy, cocksfoot, kentucky bluegrass (10% each) that differed for the purpose of their component varieties – either for hay or for grazing were sown in 1998 as ley. In their full production years (1999–2002) they were compared for yield and crop quality with permanent grasslands – a meadow and a pasture. Four harvests of the sward were made each year. The pasture mixture and the permanent pasture were grazed by dairy cattle. An area destined for grazing was 450 m2. The yield was measured based on test cuts into an area of 22.5 m2. Sward density, dry matter yield and nutritional value of the forage as well as utilization of the pasture by dairy cows were determined in the study. Weather conditions in the study period were characterized by highly variable rainfall and air temperature. Sward density was found to vary with kind of grassland, permanent pasture was characterized by higher density than the pasture ley. The yield and crop quality of the hay mixture was comparable to the output of the permanent grassland, whereas the permanent grassland gave better yields then the pasture mixture ley. Likewise, the indigestion of the forage by dairy cows from the permanent grassland was better. Permanent grasslands, especially the pasture, were assessed to be more reliable sources of forage, especially during variable weather conditions, than more vulnerable leys.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
-
Marian Wesołowski,
Dariusz Juszczak,
Plonowanie gryki w plonie głównym i wtórym
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 61 (2006)
-
Lesław Zimny,
Ryszard Gandecki,
Roman Wacławowicz,
Roman Śniady,
Produkcyjność płodozmianu: burak cukrowy – pszenica jara – jęczmień ozimy uwarunkowana zróżnicowanym nawożeniem organicznym i wzrastającymi dawkami azotu mineralnego
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 60 (2005)
-
Elsayed M. Zeidan,
Abdel-Satar A. El-Khawaga,
Hamdy A. Basha,
Ismail M. El-Hmeed,
Improvement of wheat productivity in newly reclaimed soil in Egypt
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 60 (2005)
-
TERESA GRAŻYNA WYŁUPEK,
HANNA KLIKOCKA,
MARIUSZ KULIK,
HALINA LIPIŃSKA,
ADAM GAWRYLUK,
Różnorodność florystyczna oraz wartość użytkowa fitocenoz fragmentu doliny Wieprza w Roztoczańskim Parku Narodowym w żywieniu konika polskiego
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 74 Nr 4 (2019)
-
Dorota Jankowska,
Kazimierz Szymankiewicz,
Plonowanie ziemniaka w płodozmianie i monokulturze w warunkach zróżnicowanej uprawy roli
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 59 Nr 2 (2004)
-
Andrzej Woźniak,
Leszek Rachoń,
Reakcja jęczmienia jarego na systemy uprawy roli i resztki pożniwne
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 77 Nr 1 (2022)
-
Marek Kołodziejczyk,
Kamil Gwóźdź,
Wpływ nawozów zawierających wolne aminokwasy na plonowanie współczesnej oraz dawnych odmian pszenicy zwyczajnej w produkcji ekologicznej
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 78 Nr 2 (2023)
-
ANNA SIKORSKA,
MAREK GUGAŁA,
Ekonomiczne aspekty dokarmiania dolistnego w uprawie rzepaku ozimego (Brassica napus L.)
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 75 Nr 3 (2020)
-
Natalia A. Lykova,
Anna K. Vilichko,
Dina I. Alexeeva,
Complex diagnostics of crop yield in ecological trials of cereal cultivars
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 59 Nr 4 (2004)
-
ELŻBIETA TURSKA,
GRAŻYNA WIELOGÓRSKA,
SZYMON CZARNOCKI,
Rola międzyplonów ścierniskowych w monokulturowej uprawie pszenicy jarej
,
Agronomy Science: Tom 65 Nr 1 (2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>
Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.