Abstract
The aim of the paper was a comparative assessment of the agricultural sector of Poland and Norway, in terms of its economic significance, production potential and changes in efficient utilisation, considering the specificity of agricultural policy. The source material was data retrieved from the FAOSTAT database, Statistics Norway (SSB), reports by the Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), and Statistics Poland (GUS). Studies have shown that due to natural conditions, Poland has a much greater potential for agricultural output, and in particular crop output. However, Norwegian agriculture features higher land and labour productivity. Despite the high growth rate of the analysed ratios in Polish agriculture, the difference in their level between these countries remains more than threefold and more than twofold in favour of Norway, respectively for labour and land productivity. Due to its large production potential of agriculture, Poland also has much greater agricultural export opportunities than Norway.
References
- Bański J., 2018. Phases to the transformation of agriculture in Central Europe – Selected pro-cesses and their results. Agric. Econ. – Czech. 64, 546–553. https://doi.org/10.17221/86/2018-AGRICECON
- Bański J., 2020. Selected aspects of the transformation of agriculture in the CEECs following the fall of the Eastern Bloc. Studia Obszarów Wiejskich 56, 5–31. https://doi.org/10.7163/SOW.56.1
- Czyżewski A., Kata R., Matuszczak A., 2020. Wpływ wydatków budżetowych na zmiany strukturalne i dochody w rolnictwie w warunkach funkcjonowania w Polsce instrumentów WPR [Impact of budget expenditures on structural changes and income in agriculture un-der the conditions of CAP instruments operated in Poland]. Ekonomista 6, 781–811 [in Polish]. https://doi.org/10.52335/
- dvqp.te199
- FAOSTAT database, 2024. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/MK [access: 10.01.2024].
- Filipiak T., Wicki L., 2022. Is the structure of Polish agriculture changing? A comparison based on the results of recent general agricultural censuses. Annals PAAAE 24(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/
- 10.5604/01.3001.0015.7103
- Forbord M., Bjørkhaug H., Burton R.J.F., 2014. Drivers of change in Norwegian agricultural land control and the emergence of rental farming. J. Rural Stud. 33, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/
- j.jrurstud.2013.10.009
- GUS, 2022. Powszechny spis rolny 2020. Charakterystyka gospodarstw rolnych w 2020 r. [The agricultural census 2020. Characteristics of agricultural farms in 2020], Warsaw [in Polish].
- GUS, 2023a. Rolnictwo w 2022 r. [Agriculture in 2022]. Warszawa [in Polish].
- GUS, 2023b. Statistical Yearbook of Agriculture 2022, Warsaw.
- Kapusta F., 2021. Fifteen years of Polish agriculture in the European Union. Probl. Agric. Econ. 4(369), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.30858/zer/142839
- KOWR, 2023. Wyniki polskiego handlu zagranicznego towarami rolno-spożywczymi za cały 2022 r. – rekordowy wzrost wartości polskiego eksportu [Results of Polish foreign trade in agri-food goods for the entire year 2022 – record increase in the value of Polish exports]. Biuro Analiz i Strategii, Warszawa [in Polish].
- Kraciuk J., 2018. Bezpieczeństwo żywnościowe Polski na tle wybranych krajów Europy Wschodniej [Poland’s food security compared to selected Eastern European countries]. Zesz. Nauk. SGGW, Ekon. Organ. Gospod. Żywn. 121, 41–53 [in Polish]. https://doi.org/10.22630/EIOGZ.2018.121.3
- Kumbhakar S.C., Li M., Lien G., 2023. Do subsidies matter in productivity and profitability changes?. Econ. Modell. 123, 106264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106264
- Kusz D., Zając S., Dziekan R., 2020. Regional diversification of investment outlays and labour profitability in agriculture in Poland. Annals PAAAE 22(4), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.5686
- Ministry of Agriculture and Food, 2024. https://www.regjeringen.no/en/topics/food-fisheries-and-agriculture/landbrukseiendommer/innsikt/jordvern/soil-conservation/id2009556/ [ac-cess: 21.01.2024].
- MRiRW, 2023. Polski handel zagraniczny artykułami rolno-spożywczymi w 2022 roku [Polish foreign trade in agri-food products in 2022]. Departament Rynków Rolnych i Transforma-cji Energetycznej Obszarów Wiejskich, Warszawa [in Polish].
- Neuenfeldt S., Gocht A., Heckelei T., Mittenzwei K., Ciaian P., 2021. Using aggregated farm location information to predict the regional structural change of farm specialisation, size and exit/entry in Norway agriculture. Agriculture 11, 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11070643
- NIBIO, 2024. Account results in agriculture and forestry 2022. Oslo. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3120578 [access: 20.05.2024].
- Norwegian Agricultural Agency, 2024. https://www.landbruksdirektoratet.no [access: 10.01.2024].
- Nowak A., Budzyńska A., 2023. Impact of the Common Agricultural Policy on the develop-ment of the Polish agricultural sector. In: E. Bukalska, T. Kijek, B.S. Sergi (ed.) Modeling economic growth in contemporary Poland (Entrepreneurship and Global Economic Growth), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds. 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-654-220231013
- Nowak A., Kijek T., Krukowski A., 2019. Polskie rolnictwo wobec wyzwań współczesności. T. 1. Wymiar ekonomiczno-strukturalny [Polish agriculture in the face of modern challeng-es. Vol. 1. Economic and structural dimension]. Wydawnictwo UP w Lublinie, Lublin [in Polish].
- OECD, 2021. Policies for the future of farming and food in Norway, OECD agriculture and food policy reviews. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/20b14991-en
- OECD, 2023. Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2023: Adapting Agriculture to Climate Change. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/b14de474-en.
- Poczta W., 2020. Przemiany w rolnictwie polskim w okresie transformacji ustrojowej i akcesji Polski do UE [Changes in Polish agriculture in the period of political transformation and Poland's accession to the EU]. Wieś i Rolnictwo 2(187), 57-77. https://doi.org/10.7366/wir022020/03
- Potori N., Chmieliński P., Fieldsend A.F. (ed.), 2014. Structural changes in Polish and Hungar-ian agriculture since EU accession: lessons learned and implications for the design of fu-ture agricultural policies. Research Institute of Agricultural Economics, Budapest.
- Rekdal K.E., 2021. Import av matvarer 2014–2020. Virke Statistikk og rapporter [Imports of food products 2014-2020. Virke statistics and reports], https://www.virke.no/analyse/statistikk-rapporter/import-av-matvarer/ [in Norwegian, ac-cess: 21.01.2024].
- Skaalsveen K., Gillund F., Aandahl T.R., 2022. Jordhelse i arktisk grøntproduksjon. Forpro-sjekt 2021–2022 [Soil health in Arctic vegetable production. Pilot project 2021–2022]. NIBIO Rapport 8(86) [in Norwegian].
- SSB, 2024. https://www.ssb.no/en [access: 12.01.2024].
- Svendgård-Stokke S., 2022. Vekstsesongens lengde [Length of the growing season]. NIBIO 20.05.2022 [in Norwegian].
- Ściubeł A., 2021. Productivity of production factors in Polish agriculture and in the selected European Union countries with regard to the Common Agricultural Policy payments. Probl.f Agric. Econ. 1, 46–58. https://doi.org/10.30858/zer/134229
- Tereszczuk M., 2016. Instrumenty polityki handlowej Unii Europejskiej a polski handel zagra-niczny produktami rolno-spożywczymi [European Union trade policy instruments and Po-lish foreign trade in agri-food products]. Pr. Nauk. UE Wrocł., Ekon. 449, 627–638 [in Polish].
- Wicki L., 2012. Convergence of labour productivity in agriculture in the European Union. Econ. Sci. Rur. Develop. 27, 279–284.
- World Bank, 2024. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.AGR.TOTL.ZS?locations=NO [access: 24.05.2024].
- Żyłowska K., Kozyra J., 2022. Zmiany warunków agroklimatycznych w Polsce [Changes in agro-climatic conditions in Poland]. St. Rap. IUNG-PIB Puławy 67(21), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.26114/sir.iung.2022.67.01
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
-
Jerzy Księżak,
Jan Kuś,
Faba bean yielding in varying systems of plant production
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 60 (2005)
-
BARTOSZ RÓŻANOWSKI,
KATARZYNA MOŻDŻEŃ,
JADWIGA WÓJCIK,
RYSZARD NOSALSKI,
PEIMAN ZANDI,
YAOSHENG WANG,
Influence of He-Ne laser irradiation and cadmium and lead on changes in cell cycles at Zea mays L.
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 75 No. 1 (2020)
-
MORTEZA HOSSEINZADEH,
FARIBORZ SHEKARI,
MOHSEN JANMOHAMMADI,
NASER SABAGHNIA,
Effect of sowing date and foliar application of salicylic acid on forage yields and quality of globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 68 No. 2 (2013)
-
Marek Niewęgłowski,
Mateusz Olizaruk,
Profitability of Italian broccoli production on the example of an individual farm
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 80 No. 1 (2025)
-
GRZEGORZ KLOC,
DENISE DOSTATNY,
TOMASZ SEKUTOWSKI,
WIESŁAW PODYMA,
The role of collection missions in gathering plant genetic resources material
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 73 No. 4 (2018)
-
Alicja Sułek,
Adam Harasim,
Yield and economic effect of winter and spring wheat production in the sugar beet stand
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 77 No. 2 (2022)
-
Marta Wyzińska,
Adam Kleofas Berbeć,
A Impact of sowing date and nitrogen fertilization on two cultivars of Tritordeum yield potential – a Polish pilot study
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 79 No. 4 (2024)
-
TALAL SAEED HAMEED,
BARBARA HELENA SAWICKA,
Farmers’ knowledge of sustainable potato cultivation techniques in Poland
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 74 No. 3 (2019)
-
Sebastian Kuśmierz,
Monika Skowrońska,
Carbon farming and nutrient management. Influential factors of Polish farmers’ perception of pro-climate measures
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 79 No. 1 (2024)
-
GRIGORIY DEMYDAS,
MAXIM ZAKHLEBAEV,
IVAN SHUVAR,
HALINA LIPIŃSKA,
TERESA WYŁUPEK,
The formation of the leaf surface of white melilot (Melilotus albus) depending on fertilization, seed mix and seeding rate
,
Agronomy Science: Vol. 75 No. 4 (2020)
<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.