Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 67 No. 3 (2012)

Articles

Analysis of spatial similarity in the yielding of winter wheat cultivars within the voivodeships of Silesia and Opole

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2012.3.8
Submitted: May 13, 2019
Published: 2012-09-04

Abstract

Based on the results of the yielding of winter wheat cultivars which were obtained in the experiments conducted within the frameworks of Post-registration Variety Testing System (PDOiR) in the territory of the Opole and Silesia provinces, an analysis of grouping of experimental sites characterized by similar variability of cultivars yielding was performed. The paper makes use of the results of the yielding of winter wheat cultivars from a series of PDOiR trials carried out in 2007–2009 at seven locations of different edaphic-climatic conditions within the Silesia and Opole Voivodeships. The experiments were conducted at two tillage modes, i.e. standard (A1) and intensive (A2), in two replications. The intensive level experiments differed from the standard level trials in nitrogen fertilization higher by 40 kg/ha, full chemical protection against diseases caused by fungi, and in the use of growth regulators and foliage feeding of the plants with multi-component preparation. The statistical analysis covers the yielding results of nine winter wheat cultivars examined at all the seven locations during three consecutive years. The outcome of the research was interpreted with the application of factor analysis, which enables to divide the experimental sites into subregions that are characterized by comparable variability of the yields of thecultivars. For the standard variant, three subregions were distinguished which differed significantly with respect to the yielding variability of the cultivars. The first group comprises the locations of Głubczyce, Modzurów, Łosiów and Nieznianice, whereas the second and the third groups are represented by the experimental sites situated in Pawłowice and Pągów, respectively. Distinguishing the subregions can contribute to optimization of the costs and effectiveness of PDOiR system through an ultimate reduction of the number of experiments to be performed and it will make it easier for farmers to select cultivars that are best suited to the natural conditions of particular farms.

References

Brancourt-Hulmel M., Lecomete C., 2003. Effect of environmental variates on genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat. Crop Sci. 43, 608–617.

Gauch H.G., Piepho H.P., Annicchiarico P., 2008. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: Further considerations. Crop Sci. 48, 866–889.

Drzazga T., Paderewski J., Mądry W., Krajewski P., 2009. Ocena rodów plonowania odmian pszenicy ozimej w doświadczeniach PDO na przestrzenne zmienne warunki przyrodnicze w kraju. Biul. IHAR 253, 71–82.

Jankowski P., Zieliński A., Mądry W., 2006. Analiza interakcji genotyp – środowisko dla pszenicy ozimej z wykorzystaniem metody graficznej biplot typu GGE. Część II – grupy środowisk i stabilność genotypów. Biul. IHAR 240/241, 61–74.

Kaczyński L., 1999. Reakcja odmian roślin uprawnych na czynniki środowiska. W: Podstawy organizacji i planowania doświadczalnictwa z zarejestrowanymi odmianami roślin uprawnych na Dolnym Śląsku, 35–46.

Kozak M., 2010. Comparison of three types of G × E performance plot for showing and interpreting genotypes stability and adaptability. Int. J. Plant Prod. 5, 71–82.

Kaiser H.F., 1960. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ. Psychol. Measur. 20, 141–151.

Rodriguez M., Rau D., Papa R., Attene G., 2008. Genotype environment interactions in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) different responses of landraces, recombinant inbred lines and varieties to Mediterranean environment. Euphytica 163, 231–247.

Rajfura A., Mądry W., 2008. Wydzielanie grup miejscowości na podstawie serii doświadczeń wielokrotnych ze zmiennym składem odmian w latach przy użyciu pakietu SEQRET. Część I. Teoretyczne podstawy analizy retrospektywnej. Biul. IHAR 250, 135–145

Roozeboom K.L., Schapaugh W.T., Tuinstra M.R., Vanderlip R.L., Milliken G.A., 2008. Testing wheat in variable environments: genotype, environment, interaction effects, and grouping test locations. Crop Sci. 48, 317–330.

Samonte S.O., Wilson L.T., McClung A.M., Medley J.C., 2005. Targeting cultivars onto rice growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analyses. Crop Sci. 45, 2414–2424

Weber R., Bujak H., Kaczmarek J., Gacek E., 2011. Plonowanie odmian pszenicy ozimej w Polsce południowo-zachodniej. Biul. IHAR 260/261, 121–134.

Weikai Y., Hunt L.A., 2001. Interpretation of genotype × environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Sci. 41, 19–21.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.