Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
ASPHC Baner

Vol. 21 No. 4 (2022)

Articles

The influence of four rootstocks on the growth, yield and fruit quality of two plum cultivars

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2022.4.8
Submitted: March 13, 2020
Published: 2022-08-31

Abstract

The influence of three clonal rootstocks (‘Pixyʼ, ‘Fereleyʼ and ‘St. Julien Aʼ) along with seedlings of Myrobalan
(control) on growth, yield and fruit quality of plum cultivars ‘Čačanska Najboljaʼ and ‘Čačanska Lepoticaʼ was studied in the Belgrade region (Serbia) for the six year-period (2013–2018). In comparison to control, clonal rootstocks have shown a significant effect on the decrease of trunk cross-sectional area. The lowest vigor was found in trees on the ‘Pixyʼ rootstock, then on ‘Fereleyʼ and ‘St. Julien Aʼ. Yield per hectare on trees grafted on clonal rootstocks was higher for 62–82% in ‘Čačanska Najboljaʼ, and for 26–27% in ‘Čačanska Lepoticaʼ compared to Myrobalan. In cultivar ‘Čačanska Najboljaʼ significantly higher fruit weight compared to control was obtained in the trees on the ‘Fereleyʼ and ‘St. Julien Aʼ rootstocks. The effects of rootstocks on the contents of soluble solids and total acids in the fruit were not significant. All three studied clonal rootstocks showed better results than standard Myrobalan, and can be recommended for establishing intensive plum plantations with higher planting density.

References

  1. Blažek, J., Pištěková, I. (2012). Final evaluation of nine plum cultivars grafted onto two rootstocks in a trial established in 1998 at Holovousy. Hortic. Sci., 39(3), 108–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/150/2011-HORTSCI
  2. Blažek, J., Vávra, R., Pišteková, J. (2004). Orchard performance of new plum cultivars on two rootstocks in a trial at Holovousy in 1998–2003. Hortic. Sci., 31(2), 37–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/3790-HORTSCI
  3. Botu, I., Achim, G., Botu, M., Godeanu, I., Baciu, A. (2002). The evaluation and classification of growth vigor of the plum cultivars grafted on various rootstocks. Acta Hortic., 577, 299–306. http://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.577.51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.577.51
  4. Botu, I., Preda, S., Turcu, E., Achim, G., Botu, M. (2007). Rival-a new rootstock for plum. Acta Hortic., 732, 253–256. http://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.732.36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.732.36
  5. FAOSTAT (2019). Available: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC [date of access: 20.12.2019].
  6. Glišić, I., Cerović, R., Milošević, N., Đorđević, M., Radičević, S. (2012). Initial and final fruit set in some plum (Prunus domestica L.) hybrids under different pollination types. Genetika, 44(3), 583–593. http://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1203583G DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1203583G
  7. Grzyb, S.Z., Sitarek, M. (2006). The influence of different rootstocks on the growth, yield and fruit quality of plum tree cv. ‘Dąbrowice Prune’ planted in exhausted soil. Sci. Works Lith. Inst. Hortic. Lith. Univ. Agric., 25(3), 292–295.
  8. Kosina, J. (2004). Orchard performance of two plum cultivars on some clonal rootstocks. Hortic. Sci., 31(3), 93–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/3799-HORTSCI
  9. J., Geibel, M., Fischer, M., Fischer, C. (2000). Evaluation of some new plum rootstocks in the orchard. Acta Hortic., 538, 757–760. http://doi.org/10.17660/Acta-Hortic. 2000.538.137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.538.137
  10. Magyar, L., Hrotkó, K. (2006). Growth and productivity of plum cultivars on various rootstocks in intensive orchard. Int. J. Hortic. Sci., 12(3), 77–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31421/IJHS/12/3/663
  11. Meland, M. (2010). Performance of six European plum cultivars on four plum rootstocks growing in a northern climate. Acta Agric. Scand. B – Soil Plant Sci., 60(4), 381–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710903103917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710903103917
  12. Mészáros, M., Kosina, J., Laňar, L., Náměstek, J. (2015). Long-term evaluation of growth and yield of Stanley and Cacanska lepotica plum cultivars on selected rootstocks. Hortic. Sci., 42(1), 22–28. http://doi.org/10.17221/192/2014-HORTSCI DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/192/2014-HORTSCI
  13. Milosevic, T., Zornic, B., Glisic, I. (2008). A comparison of low-density and high-density plum plantings for differences in establishment and management costs, and in returns over the first three growing seasons. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech., 83, 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2008.11512419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2008.11512419
  14. Milošević, T., Milošević, N. (2012). The physical and chemical attributes of plum influenced by rootstock. Acta Aliment. Hung., 41(3), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1556/AAlim.41.2012.3.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/AAlim.41.2012.3.1
  15. Neumüller, M. (2011). Fundamental and applied aspects of plum (Prunus domestica L.) breeding. Fruit Veg. Cereal Sci. Biotech., 5(1), 139–156.
  16. Nikolić, D., Milatović, D. (2010). Examining self-compatibility in plum (Prunus domestica L.) by fluorescence microscopy. Genetika, 42(2), 387–396. http://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1002387N. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1002387N
  17. Nikolić, D.T., Rakonjac, V.S., Fotirić-Akšić, M.M. (2012). The effect of pollenizer on the fruit set of plum cultivar Čačanska Najbolja. J. Agric. Sci., 57(1), 9–18. http://doi.org/10.2298/JAS1201009N DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/JAS1201009N
  18. Ogašanović, D., Tešović, Ž., Ognjanov, V., Mitrović, M., Radulović, M., Plazinić, R., Leposavić, A., Lukić, M., Radičević, S. (2005). Nove sorte i podloge voćaka. Voćarstvo, 39(3), 213–232.
  19. Ogašanović, D., Miletić, R., Mitrović, M. (2011). Uporedna ispitivanja različitih vegetativnih podloga za šljivu. Arhiv za poljoprivredne nauke, 72(2), 45–54.
  20. Radović, M., Milatović, D., Zec, G. (2016). Influence of rootstocks on the properties of fruiting twigs in plum cultivars. VII International Scientific Agriculture Symposium,”Agrosym 2016”, Jahorina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 839–844.
  21. Rato, A.E., Agulheiro, A.C., Barroso, J.M., Riquelme, F. (2008). Soil and rootstock influence on fruit quality of plums (Prunus domestica L.). Sci. Hortic., 118(3), 218–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.06.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.06.013
  22. Reig, G., Forcada, C.F., Mestre, L., Jiménez, S., Betrán, J.A., Moreno, M.Á. (2018). Horticultural, leaf mineral and fruit quality traits of two ‘Greengage’ plum cultivars budded on plum based rootstocks in Mediterranean conditions. Sci. Hortic., 232, 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.12.052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.12.052
  23. Sitarek, M., Grzyb, Z.S., Guzowska-Spaleniak, B., Lis, J. (2004). Performance of tree rootstocks for plums in two different soils and climatic conditions. Acta Hortic., 658, 273–277. http://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.658.38 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.658.38
  24. Sitarek, M., Grzyb, Z.S., Koziński, B. (2007). Effect of four different rootstocks on the growth, yield and fruit quality of ‘Valor’ plum trees. Acta Hortic., 734, 413–416. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.734.62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.734.62
  25. Sosna, I. (2002). Growth and cropping of four plum cultivars on different rootstocks in South Western Poland. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res., 10, 95–103.
  26. Sosna, I. (2006). Estimation of several plum cultivars on four rootstocks. Sci. Works Lith. Inst. Hortic. Lith. Univ. Agric., 25(3), 250–257.
  27. Surányi, D. (2006). Estimation of plum and prune cultivars with morphogenetic traits. Int. J. Hortic. Sci., 12(2), 147–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31421/IJHS/12/2/648
  28. Świerczyński, S., Stachowiak, A. (2009). The usefulness of two rootstocks for some plum cultivars. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res., 17(2), 63–71.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.