Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
ASPHC Baner

Vol. 18 No. 1 (2019)

Articles

EARLY PERFORMANCE OF FOUR SWEET CHERRY CULTIVARS GRAFTED ON GISELA 5 AND COLT ROOTSTOCKS IN A HIGH DENSITY GROWING SYSTEM

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2019.1.10
Submitted: February 21, 2019
Published: 2019-02-21

Abstract

Growing the sweet cherry on different vigor rootstocks, such as Colt and Gisela 5, in a high-density orchard, causes differences in growth and productivity and later imposes the need to change the growing system including pruning, flower and fruit thinning, irrigation and fertilization. In the present research, four sweet cherry cultivars (Summit, Kordia, Lapins and Regina) grafted on Colt and Gisela 5 rootstocks were assessed for morphological traits and productivity. The parameters investigated were: vegetative growth, bearing potential, fruit set, precocity, productivity, fruit growth habit and quality attributes. Compared to Colt, the trees on Gisela 5 had smaller TCSA and the length of two-year-old branches, in the fifth season after planting. Trees on Gisela 5 had a higher number of flower buds per may bouquet compared to Colt, which confirms that bearing potential is highly affected by the rootstock. Growing the sweet cherries on Gisela 5 induced a higher fruit setting in all cultivars except in Kordia. Fruit physical attributes were affected by the cultivar, growing system and experimental year. For all tested cultivars, the yield per tree was significantly lower on Colt compared to Gisela 5. Gisela 5 performed better than Colt, which suggests that Gisela 5 should be used as a rootstock in high density sweet cherry production systems.

References

  1. Bujdosó, G., Hrotkó, K. (2016). Perfomance on three Hungarian early sweet cherry cultivars on some novel bred rootstocks. Acta Hortic., 1139, 153−158. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1139.27.
  2. Cantín, M.C., Pinochet, J., Gogorcena, Y., Moreno, M.A. (2010). Growth, yield and fruit quality of ‘Van’ and ‘Stark Hardy Giant’ sweet cherry cultivars as influenced by grafting on different rootstocks. Sci. Hortic., 123, 329–335.
  3. Fotirić-Akšić, M., Nikolić, T. (2013). Analysis of pomological traits in new promising sweet cherry genotypes. Genetika, 45, 873–880.
  4. Garcia-Montiel, F., Serrano, M., Martinez-Romero, D., Alburquerque, N. (2010). Factors influencing fruit set and quality in different sweet cherry cultivars. Span. J. Agric. Res., 8, 1118–1128.
  5. Gjamovski, V., Kiprijanovski, M., Arsov, T. (2016). Evaluation of some cherry varieties grafted on Gisela 5 root-stock. Turk. J. Agric. For., 40, 737–745.
  6. Goncvales, B., Moutinho-Pereira, J., Santos, A., Silva, A.P., Bacelar, E., Correia, C., Rosa, E. (2006). Scion-rootstock interaction affects the physiology and fruit quality of sweet cherry. Tree Physiol., 26, 93–104.
  7. Guimond, C.M., Andrews, P.K., Lang, G.A. (1998). Scanning electron microscopy of floral initiation in sweet cherry. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 123, 509–512.
  8. Gyeviki, M., Bujdosó, G., Hrotkó, K. (2008). Results of cherry rootstock evaluations in Hungary. Int. J. Hortic. Sci., 14, 7–10.
  9. Kappel, F., Fisher-Fleming, B., Hogue, E. (1996). Fruit characteristics and sensory attributes of an ideal sweet cherry. HortScience, 31, 443–446.
  10. Kappel, F., Lichou, J. (1994). Flowering and fruiting of ‘Burlat’ sweet cherry on size-controlling rootstock. HortScience, 29, 611–612.
  11. Keserović, Z., Magazin, N., Milić, M., Dorić, M. (2011). Morfološke osobine slabobujnih selekcija magrive (Prunus mahaleb L.). Voćarstvo, 45, 129–134.
  12. Lanauskas, J., Uselis, N., Kviklys, D., Kviklienė, N., Buskienė, L. (2012). Rootstock effect on the performance of sweet cherry cv. Lapins. HortScience, 39, 55–60.
  13. Lang, G.A. (2000). Precocious, dwarfing, and productive − How will new cherry rootstocks impact the sweet cherry industry? HortTechnology, 10, 719–725.
  14. Meland, M. (1998). Yield and fruit quality of ‘Van’ sweet cherry in four high density production systems over seven years. Acta Hortic., 468, 425–432.
  15. Milić, B., Keserović, Z., Dorić, M., Ognjanov, V., Magazin, N. (2015). Fruit set and quality of self-fertile sweet cherries as affected by chemical flower thinning. HortScience, 42, 119–124.
  16. Milošević, T., Milošević, N., Glišić, I., Nikolić, R., Milivojević, J. (2015). Early tree growth, productivity, fruit quality and leaf nutrients content of sweet cherry grown in a high density planting system. Hort. Sci., 42, 1–12.
  17. Milošević, T., Milošević, N., Milivojević, J., Glišić, I., Nikolić, R. (2014). Experiences with Mazzard and Colt sweet cherry rootstocks in Serbia which are used for high density planting system under heavy and acidic soil conditions. Sci. Hortic., 176, 261–272.
  18. Neilsen, D., Neilsen, G.H., Forge, T., Lang, G.A. (2016). Dwarfing rootstocks and training systems affest initial growth, cropping and nutririon in ’Skeena’ sweet cherry. Acta Hortic., 1130, 199–206. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1130.29.
  19. Olmstead, J.W., Iezzoni, A.F., Whiting, M.D. (2007). Genotypic differences in sweet cherry fruit size are primarily a function of cell number. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 132, 697–703.
  20. Pérez-Sánchez, R., Gómez-Sánchez, M.A., Morales-Corts, M.R. (2010). Description and quality evaluation of sweet cherries cultured in Spain. J. Food Qual., 33, 490–506.
  21. Rötzer, T., Chmielewski, F.M. (2001). Phenological maps of Europe. Clim. Res., 18, 249–257.
  22. Serrano, M., Diaz-Mula, H.M., Zapata, P.J., Castillo, S., Guillen, F., Martínez-Romero, D., Valverde, J.M., Valero, D. (2009). Maturity stage at harvest determines the fruit quality and antioxidant potential after storage of sweet cherry cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem., 57, 3240–3246.
  23. Webster, A.D. (1995). Rootstock and interstock effects on deciduous fruit tree vigour, precocity, and yield productivity. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci., 23, 373–382.
  24. Whiting, M.D., Lang, G.A. (2004). ‘Bing’ sweet cherry on the dwarfing rootstock ‘Gisela 5’: thinning affects fruit quality and vegetative growth but not net CO2 exchange. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 129, 407–415.
  25. Whiting, M.D., Ophardt, D., McFerson, J.R. (2006). Chemical blossom thinners vary in their effect on sweet cherry fruit set, yield, fruit quality, and crop value. HortTehnology, 16, 66–70.
  26. Whiting, M.D., Lang, G.A., Ophardt, D. (2005). Rootstock and training system affect sweet cherry growth, yield, and fruit quality. HortScience, 40, 582–586.
  27. Wociór, S. (2008). The effect of rootstock on the growth and yielding of cultivar ‘Kordia’ sweet cherry trees. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 7, 21–26.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.