Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
ASPHC Baner

Vol. 21 No. 3 (2022)

Articles

EFFECTS OF ENRICHED ZEOLITE AND POULTRY MANURE ON QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF GREEN BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2022.3.6
Submitted: April 6, 2021
Published: 2022-06-30

Abstract

In order to investigate the effects of enriched zeolite and poultry manure on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of green beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), a field experiment was conducted as a factorial in a randomized complete block design with three replications at Amol, Mazandaran province, Iran in 2017 and 2018. Zeolite in five levels including Z1 (control), Z2 – zeolite application, Z3 – enriched zeolite with zinc, Z4 – enriched zeolite with copper and Z5 – enriched zeolite with zinc + copper as well as Poultry manure in five levels including P1 (control), P2 – poultry manure application, P3 – fortified poultry manure with zinc, P4 – fortified poultry manure with copper and P5 – fortified poultry manure with zinc+copper were considered as experimental factors. The results showed that the application of enriched poultry manure and zeolite with zinc and copper caused a significant increase in yield components, yield, photosynthetic pigments and nutrient concentrations in green beans compared to separate application of poultry manure or zeolite and control. In terms of poultry manure application, maximum grain yield (1.74 t/ha) by P5 treatment and in case of zeolite application, highest grain yield (1.71 t/ha) was achieved by Z5 treatment, and by not using fertilizer treatments, yield decreased by about 27% and 23.3%, respectively. Therefore, considering the positive response of green bean to the application of enriched poultry manure and zeolite, it seems that the use of these fertilizers while reducing the application of chemical fertilizers is a suitable method for improving plant yield along with healthy and sustainable production of agricultural products.

References

  1. Alhrout, H.H., Aldalin, H., Haddad, M.A., Bani-Hani, N.M., Al-Dalein, S.Y. (2016). The impact of organic and inorganic fertilizer on yield and yield components of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Adv. Environ. Biol., 10(9), 8–14.
  2. Arnon, D.I. (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol., 24(1), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1
  3. Aslani, A., Souri, M.K. (2018). Growth quality of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under foliar application of organic-chelate fertilizers. Open Agric., 3, 146–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2018-0015
  4. Baek, S.A., Han, T., Ahn, S.K., Kang, H., Cho, M.R., Lee, S.C., Im, K.H. (2012). Effects of heavy metals on plant growths and pigment contents in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Pathol. J., 28(4), 446–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.NT.01.2012.0006
  5. Baghbani-Arani, A., Modarres-Sanavy, S.A.M., Mashhadi-Akbar-Boojar, M., Mokhtassi-Bidgoli, A. (2017). Towards improving the agronomic performance, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and pigments in fenugreek using zeolite and vermicompost under deficit water stress. Ind. Crops Prod., 109, 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.08.049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.08.049
  6. Bakhshandeh, A., Gharineh, M.H., Abdale, A.R., Moraditelavat, M.R., Reiszadeh, M. (2016). Effect of nitrogen level and natural zeolite on qualitative and quantitative function of Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) in Ahvaz climatic condition. Iran. J. Field Crop Res., 14(2), 244–254.
  7. Boateng, S., Zickermann, A.J., Kornaharens, M. (2006). Effect of poultry manure on growth and yield of maize. West African J. Appl. Ecol., 9, 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/wajae.v9i1.45682
  8. Calvo-Polanco, M., Sánchez-Romera, B., Aroca, R. (2014). Mild salt stress conditions induce different responses in root hydraulic conductivity of Phaseolus vulgaris over-time. PloS one, 9(3), e90631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090631
  9. Davari, M.R., Kazazi, S.B., Pivehzhani, O.A. (2017). Nanomaterials: implications on agroecosystem. In: Nanotechnology. An agricultural paradigm, Prasad, R., Kumar, M., Kumar, V. (eds.). Springer, Singapore, 59–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4573-8_4
  10. Diacono, M., Montemurro, F. (2010). Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility. Agron.r Sustain. Dev., 30, 401–422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009040
  11. Emami, A. (1996). Plant analysis methods. Soil Water Res. Inst., 1, 982.
  12. Fallah, S., Ghalavand, A., Khajehpour, M.R. (2007). Effects of animal manure incorporation methods and its integration with chemical fertilizer on yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.) in khorramabad, Lorestan. Sci. Technol. Agric. Nat. Res., 11(40), 233–242.
  13. Gholamhoseini, M., Ghalavand, A., Khodaei-Joghan, A., Dolatabadian, A., Zakikhani, H., Farmanbar, E. (2013). Zeolite-amended cattle manure effects on sunflower yield, seed quality, water use efficiency and nutrient leaching. Soil Tillage Res., 126, 193–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.08.002
  14. Jasim, H., Mhanna, Q.L. (2014). Effect of some organic fertilizer’s treatments on dry seed yield of broad bean (Vicia faba L.). Sci. Papers Ser. A, Agron., 57, 218–222.
  15. Keshavarz, H. (2020). Study of water deficit conditions and beneficial microbes on the oil quality and agronomic traits of canola (Brassica napus L.). Grasas Y Aceites, 71(3), e373. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0572191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.0572191
  16. Keshavarz, H., Khodabin, G. (2019). The role of uniconazole in improving physiological and biochemical attributes of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) subjected to drought stress. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol., 22(2), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-019-0050-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-019-0050-0
  17. Keshavarz, H., Modarres-Sanavy, S.A.M., Mahdipour, Afra, M. (2018). Organic and chemical fertilizer affected yield and essential oil of two mint species. J. Essent. Oil-bear. Plants, 21(6), 1674–1681. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060X.2018.1497545 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060X.2018.1497545
  18. Keshavarz Mirzamohammadi, H., Modarres-Sanavy, S.A.M., Sefidkon, F., Mokhtassi-Bidgoli, A., Mirjalili, M.H. (2021a). Irrigation and fertilizer treatments affecting rosmarinic acid accumulation, total phenolic content, antioxidant potential and correlation between them in peppermint (Mentha piperita L.). Irrig. Sci., 39, 671–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-021-00729-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-021-00729-z
  19. Keshavarz-Mirzamohammadi, H., Tohidi-Moghadam, H.R., Hosseini, S.J. (2021b). Is there any relationship between agronomic traits, soil properties and essential oil profile of peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) treated by fertiliser treatments and irrigation regimes?. Ann. Appl. Biol., 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12707
  20. Khodaei-Joghan, A., Asilan, K.S. (2012). Zeolite influences on nitrate leaching, nitrogen-use efficiency, yield and yield components of canola in sandy soil. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci., 58, 1149–1169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2011.572876
  21. Kumar, R., Mehrotra, N.K., Nautiyd, B.D., Kumar, P., Singh, P.K. (2009). Effect of copper on growth, yield and concentration of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu in wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L). J. Env. Biol., 30, 485–488.
  22. Lack, Sh., Kermanshahi, M., Noryani, H. (2016). Variation trend of leaf area index, yield and yield components of green beans (Phaseolous vulgaris L.) by using zinc sulfate and nitrogen. J. Crop Ecophysiol., 9(4), 599–610.
  23. Li, B.Y, Zhou, D.M., Cang, L., Zhang, H.L, Fan, X.H., Qin, S.W. (2007). Soil micronutrient availability to crops as affected by long-term inorganic and organic fertilizer applications. Soil Tillage Res., 96, 166–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2007.05.005
  24. Lija, M., Haruna, A.O., Kasim, S. (2014). Maize (Zea mays L.) nutrient use efficiency as affected by formulated fertilizer with clinoptilolite zeolite. Emir. J. Food Agric., 26, 284–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.v26i3.16183
  25. Liu, G., Zotarelli, L., Li, Y., Dinkins, D., Wang, Q., Ozores-Hampton, M. (2014). Controlled-release and slow-release fertilizers as nutrient management tools. Dep. Hortic. Sci., 1255, 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-hs1255-2014
  26. Madhavi, Y. (2007). Studies on the effect of different levels of vermicompost, castor cake, poultry manure and bio fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of Indian spinach (Beta vulgaris var. bengalensis Hort.). B.S.c. Horticulture. Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University. P.137.
  27. Mahesh, M., Thomas, J., Kumar, K.A., Bhople, B.S., Saresh, N.V., Vaid, S.K., Sahu, S.K. (2018). Zeolite farming: A sustainable agricultural prospective. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 7(5), 2912–2924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.340
  28. Movahedi Naini, S.A., Khorshahi, M., Hosseini, M., Mashayekhi, K. (2017). Economic estimation of the effect of potassium fertilizer and zeolite clinoptilolite for wheat production. J. Crop Prod., 10(2), 45–60.
  29. Nozari, R., Moghadam, H.R., Zahedi, H. (2013). Effect of cattle manure and zeolite applications on physiological and biochemical changes in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] grown under water deficit stress. Rev. Cient. UDO Agríc., 13(1), 76–84.
  30. Ozbahce, A., Tari, A.F., Gönülal, E., Simsekli, N., Padem, H. (2015). The effect of zeolite applications on yield components and nutrient uptake of common bean under water stress. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci., 61(5), 615–626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2014.946021
  31. Saikachout, S., Benmansoura, A., Ennajah, A., Leclerc, J.C., Ouerghi, Z., Karray, N. (2015). Effects of metal toxicity on growth and pigment contents of annual halophyte (A. hortensis and A. rosea). Int. J. Env. Res., 9(2), 613–620.
  32. Sembiring, S., Sembiring, R., Karo, S. (2017). Zeolite and urea fertilizer in the growth and yield of maize. J. Res. Agric. Animal Sci., 4(9), 14–24.
  33. Singh, R., Singh, P., Singh, H., Raghubanshi, A.S. (2019). Impact of sole and combined application of biochar, organic and chemical fertilizers on wheat crop yield and water productivity in a dry tropical agro-ecosystem. Biochar, 1, 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-019-00013-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-019-00013-6
  34. Soremi, A.O., Adetunji, M.T., Adejuyigbe, C.O., Bodunde, J.G., Azeez, J.O. (2017). Effects of poultry manure on some soil chemical properties and nutrient bioavailability to soybean. J. Agric. Ecol. Res. Int., 11(3), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/JAERI/2017/32419
  35. Zhang, K., Chen, L., Li, Y., Brookes, P. C., Xu, J., Lou, Y. (2017). The effects of combinations of biochar, lime, and organic fertilizer on nitrificationand nitrifiers. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 53, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-016-1154-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-016-1154-0
  36. Teow, C.C., Truong, V.D., McFeeters, R.F., Thompson, R.L., Pecota, K.V., Yencho, G.C. (2007). Antioxidant activities, phenolic and β-carotene contents of sweet potato genotypes with varying flesh colours. Food Chem., 103(3), 829–838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.09.033
  37. Turkmen, A., Kutuk, Y. (2017). Effects of chemical fertilizer, algea compost and zeolite on green bean yield. Turkish J. Agric. – Food Sci. Technol., 5(3), 289–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v5i3.289-293.977
  38. Yadav, P., Kaur, R., Kohli, S.K., Sirhindi, G., Bhardwaj, R. (2016). Castasterone assisted accumulation of polyphenols and antioxidant to increase tolerance of B. juncea plants towards copper toxicity. Cogent Food Agric., 2(1), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2016.1276821
  39. Yazdanpanah, A., Motalebifard, R. (2016). The effects of poultry manure and potassium fertilizer on yield and nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, zinc and copper uptake of potato. Appl. Soil Res., 4(2), 60–71.
  40. Zheng, J., Chen, T., Wu, Q., Yu, J., Chen, W., Chen, Y., Xia, G. (2018). Effect of zeolite application on phenology, grain yield and grain quality in rice under water stress. Agric. Water Manag., 206, 241–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.05.008

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.