Abstrakt
The object of the studies were soybean plants grown of the seeds dressed with Polyversum, Biochikol 020 PC and Biosept 33 SL. At anthesis those plants were sprayed with the same biopreparations. The experiment considered a combination with the chemical preparation Zaprawa Oxafun T for seed dressing, and Bravo Plus SC for spraying plants at anthesis. It can be stated on the basis of the obtained results that the application of biopreparations for seed dressing and spraying plants at anthesis was similar to that of chemical preparations. Among the studied biopreparations, Biosept 33 SL turned out to be
the most effective in protecting plants from soil-borne pathogenic fungi.
Bibliografia
Booth G., 1971. The genus Fusarium. Mycol. Papers CMY, England.
Borkowski J., Nowosielski O., 2001. The use of Trichodex 25 WP, Biosept 33 SL, Chitosan and Florochron in the protection of tomato against powdery mildew. The effect of these preparations on the fruit yield. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. biol. Sci. 49 (3), 173–178.
Borkowski J., Felczyńska A., Stepowski J., 2006. Effect of different compounds Biochikol 020 PC, calcium nitrate, Tytanit and Pomonit on the healthiness and the yield of chinese cabbage. Polish Chitin Soc., Monograph XI, 201–207.
Dos Santos A.F., Dhingra O.D., 1982. Pathogenicity of Trichoderma spp. on the sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Can. J. Bot. 60, 472.
Elandt R., 1964. Statystyka matematyczna w zastosowaniu do doświadczalnictwa rolniczego. Warszawa PWN.
Lori G. A., Sarando S. J., 1989. Pathogenicity of Fusarium spp. incidence on soybean seed quality. Agronomie 9, 77–82.
Nelson B., Helms I., Christianson T., Kural I., 1996. Characterization and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia from soybean. Plant Dis. 80, 74–80.
Nickel S.E., Crookston R.K., Russelle M.P., MacDonald D., 1992. Root health affected by longterm corn soybean rotation study. In Agronomy. abstr. USA, Medison, WJ, 152.
Orlikowski L. B., Skrzypczak Cz., Wojdyła A., 1999. Biological activity of plant extracts and chitosan toward soil-borne and leaf pathogens. Botanica Lithuanica 3, 147–154.
Orlikowski L. B., Skrzypczak Cz., Harmaj I., 2001. Biological activity of grapefruit extract in the control of Fusarium oxysporum. J. Plant Prot. Res. 41, 4, 420–427.
Papavizas G.C., 1985. Gliocladium and Trichoderma : Biology, ecology and potential for biocontrol. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 23, 23–54.
Patkowska E., 2006. The use of bioreparations in the control of soybean endangered by pathogenic soil-borne fungi. EJPAU, Horticulture, 9, 1, http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume9/issue1/art.- 19.html
Pięta D., 1988. Mikozy występujące w uprawach fasoli (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) i podatność różnych odmian na porażenie przez niektóre grzyby. Wyd. AR Lunlin, Rozpr. Nauk., 111.
Pięta D., Pastucha A., 1993. Grzyby porażające nasiona soi (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) oraz przydatność niektórych fungicydów jako zapraw nasiennych. Biul. Warzyw. XL, 101–109.
Pospieszny H., Struszczyk H., 1994. Chitozan-potencjalny biopreparat przeciwko patogenom roślin. Mat. 34 Sesji Nauk. IOR, 117–123.
Sinclair J. B., Backman P. A., 1989. Compedium of soybean diseases. Amer. Phytopathol. Soc., PRESS, USA, 106 pp.
Szczeponek A., Mazur S., Nawrocki J., 2006. The usage of chitosan in protection of some peppermint and lemon balm pathogens. Polish Chitin Soc., Monograph XI, 103–200.
Szyrmer J., Boros L., 1996. Postęp w hodowli i wprowadzaniu do uprawy nowych odmian soi. Biul. IHAR 198, 5–12.
Szyrmer J., Boros L., 1997. Postęp w krajowej hodowli fasoli i soi. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. 446, 43–53.
Weller D.M., 1988. Biological control of soilborne plant pathogens in the rhizospere with bacteria. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 26, 379–407.
Wojdyła A. T., Orlikowski L. B., Niekraszewicz A., Struszczyk H., 1997. Chitosan in the control of Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosea and Peronospora sparsa on roses and Myrothecium roridum on diffenbachia. VII Conf. 18-19 March, sec. Biol. Control Plant Dis. Polish Phytopath. Soc. 151, Skierniewice.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
