Comparison of the yielding of plum, sour cherry, and sweet cherry trees trained to a trellis for mechanical harvesting of fruit with those trained to a leader

Zbigniew Buler; Jacek Rabcewicz; Paweł Białkowski

doi:10.24326/asphc.2023.4638

Tom 22 Nr 4 (2023)

Artykuły

Comparison of the yielding of plum, sour cherry, and sweet cherry trees trained to a trellis for mechanical harvesting of fruit with those trained to a leader

Zbigniew Buler⁺⁻
Jacek Rabcewicz⁺⁻
Paweł Białkowski⁺⁻

PDF (English)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2023.4638
Przesłane: 22 marca 2022
Opublikowane: 2023-08-31

Abstrakt

In 2014, plum, sour cherry and sweet cherry trees were planted in an experimental plot of the Institute of Horticulture – National Research Institute at a distance of 4.5 m between rows and, depending on the cultivar, every 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 m in a row. The trees were trained in the shape of the letter ‘Y’, with the shoots raised at an angle of 20° or 30° to the horizontal, intended for mechanical harvesting of dessert fruit with a harvester attached to a tractor. The two tree canopy formation systems at both shoot inclination angles were compared with the standard spindle crown with a vertical leader, from which the fruit was picked by hand. After 3 years of training the trees, mechanical harvesting of dessert fruit began with a harvester designed at the Institute of Horticulture in Skierniewice. The trees formed in the shape of the letter ‘Y’ produced comparable yields, and also higher and lower yields, depending on the cultivar, in comparison with the trees trained to a spindle crown.

Bibliografia

Ampatzidis, Y.G., Zhang, Q., Whiting, M. (2012). Comparing the efficiency of future harvest technologies for sweet cherry. Acta Hort., 965, 195–198. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2012.965.26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.965.26
Ampatzidis, Y.G., Whiting, M.D. (2013). Training system affects sweet cherry harvest efficiency. HortSci., 48(5), 547–555. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.48.5.547 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.48.5.547
Brown, G.K., Marshall, D.E., Tennes, B.R., Booster, D.E., Chen, P., Garrett, R.E. (1983). Status of harvest mechanization of horticultural crops. ASAE Publication, St. Joseph, Michigan, 78.
Castro-García, S., Blanco Roldán, G.L., Jiménez-Jiménez, F., Gil-Ribes, J.A., Ferguson, L., Glozer, K. (2012). Preparing Spain and California table olive industries for mechanical harvesting. Acta Hort., 965, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2012.965.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.965.1
Day, K.R., Johnson, R.S., DeJong, T.M. (2013). Developing a pedestrian plum orchard: the role of tree form, density, and height. Acta Hort., 985, 175–180. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2013.985.21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.985.21
Diener, R.G., Elliott, K.C., Nesselroad, P.E., Adams, R.E., Blizzard, S.H., Ingle, M., Singha, S. (1982). The West Virginia University tree fruit harvester. J. Agr. Eng. Res., 27(3), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(82)90061-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(82)90061-0
Ferguson, L., Glozer, K., Crisosto, C., Rosa, U.A., Castro-García, S., Fichtner, E.J. (2012). Improving canopy contact olive harvester efficiency with mechanical pruning. Acta Hort., 965, 83–87. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2012.965.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.965.8
He, L., Zhou, J., Zhang, Q., Karkee, M. (2015). Evaluation of multipass mechanical harvesting on ‘Skeena’ sweet cherries trained to Y-trellis. HortSci., 50(8), 1178–1182. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.50.8.1178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.50.8.1178
Jiménez, M.R., Rallo, P., Suárez, M.P., Morales-Sillero, A.M., Casanova, L., Rapoport, H.F. (2011). Cultivar susceptibility and anatomical evaluation of table olive fruit bruising. Acta Hort., 924, 419–424. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2011.924.53 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.924.53
Larbi, P.A., Karkee, M. (2014). Effects of orchard characteristics and operator performance on harvesting rate of a mechanical sweet cherry harvester. GSTF J. Agric. Eng., 1, 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5176/2345-7848_1.1.1
Mika, A., Buler, Z., Rabcewicz, J., Białkowski, P., Konopacka, D. (2016). Horizontal canopy for plums mechanically harvested in continuous motion. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus, 15(6), 49–59.
Mika, A., Wawrzyńczak, P., Buler, Z., Konopacka, D., Konopacki, P., Krawiec, A. (2012). Mechanical harvesting of plums for processing with a continuously moving combine harvester. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res., 20(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10290-012-0003-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10290-012-0003-y
Mika, A., Wawrzyńczak, P., Buler, Z., Krawiec, A., Białkowski, P., Michalska, B., Plaskota, M., Gotowicki, B. (2011). Results of experiments with densely-planted sour cherry trees for harvesting with a continuously moving combine harvester. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res., 19(2), 31–40.
Peterson, D.L. (2005). Harvest mechanization progress and prospects for fresh market quality deciduous tree fruits. HortTech., 15(1), 72–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.15.1.0072
Peterson, D.L., Wolford, S.D. (2001). Mechanical harvester for fresh market quality stemless sweet cherries. Trans. ASAE, 44(3), 481–485. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.6103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.6103
Rabcewicz, J., Mika, A., Buler, Z., Białkowski, P. (2017). Preliminary valuation of ‘Y’ and ‘V’-trellised canopies for mechanical harvesting of plums, sweet cherries and sour cherries for the fresh market. J. Hort. Res., 25(2), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1515/johr-2017-0019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/johr-2017-0019
Seavert, C.F., Whiting, M.D. (2011). Comparing the economics of mechanical and traditional sweet cherry harvest. Acta Hort., 903, 725–730. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2011.903.101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.903.101
Wawrzyńczak, P., Cianciara, Z., Krzewiński, J. (1998). A new concept of mechanical harvest of sour cherries. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res., 6(3–4), 123–128.