HARMFULNESS OF Phomopsis diachenii Sacc. TO HERBS FROM Apiaceae FAMILY AND PREPARATIONS LIMITING THE GROWTH OF THIS FUNGUS
Ewa Dorota Zalewska
University of Life Sciences in LublinZofia Machowicz-Stefaniak
University of Life Sciences in LublinEwa Dorota Król
University of Life Sciences in LublinAbstract
Phomopsis diachenii belongs to the fungi increasingly noted on herbal plants from Apiaceae family. Considering the documented fungal pathogenicity for herbs, the possibility of limiting the growth and development of P. diachenii was studied. Two biotechnical preparations i.e. Biosept Active and Beta-chikol and 12 fungicides from different chemical groups as well as one isolate of P. diachenii K 651, obtained from caraway were used for the study. Tests were performed by poisoning the culture media with each of the tested preparations, which were then inoculated with the P. diachenii inoculum. The percentage of inhibition of the growth of four- and eight-day-old fungus colonies on the medium with preparations in comparison to the control colonies was a measure of the toxic activity of the preparations. The effectiveness of Beta-chikol in limiting P. diachenii growth was significantly higher than the efficiency of Biosept Active. All fungicides limited the growth and development of P. diachenii, and the effectiveness of inhibitory activity was correlated with the concentration of the active ingredient in fungicide. The most promising compound in reducing the growth and development of P. diachenii was mancozeb.
Keywords:
caraway, angelica, Biosept Active, Beta-chikol, fungicidesReferences
Farr D.F., Bills G.F., Chamuris G.P., Rossman A.Y., 1995. Fungi on plants products in the United States. St. Paul, Minnesota USA.
Gabler J., Ehrig F., 2000. Phomopsis diachenii Sacc. ein aggressiver Krankheitserreger an Kümmel (Carum carvi L.) – Erestanchweis für Deutschland. Z. Arzn. Gew. Pfl. 4(1), 36–39.
Kačergius A., Rodeva R., Gabler J., Stoyanova Z., 2011. Phylogenetic analysis of Phomopsis isolates from different host plants. XVIII Symposium of the Baltic Mycologists and Lichenologists. Lithuania, Dubingiai, September 19–23, Programme and Abstracts, 12–13.
Kowalik R., Krechniak R., 1961. Szczegółowa metodyka biologicznych i laboratoryjnych badań środków chemicznych. Materiały do metodyki biologicznej oceny środków ochrony roślin. IOR. Poznań, 63–91.
Król E., 2005. Influence of some chemicals on the variability of Phomopsis viticola Sacc. spores. J. Plant Prot. Res. 45(3), 195–204.
Kusterer A., Taubenrauch K., Gabler J., Kühne T., 2002. Krankheitsauftreten an Kümmel (Carum carvi L.), Fenchel (Foeniclum vulgare Mill.) und Dill (Anethum graveolens L.) am Standort Aschersleben. Z. Arzn. Gew. Pfl. 7(3), 387–391.
Machowicz-Stefaniak Z., 2009. The occurrence and biotic activity of Phomopsis diachenii Sacc. Acta Agrobot. 62(2), 125–135.
Machowicz-Stefaniak Z., Zalewska E., 2011. Occurrence of Colletotrichum dematium on selected herbs species and preparations inhibiting pathogen’s growth and development in vitro. Ecol. Chem. Eng. S. 18(4), 465–478.
Machowicz-Stefaniak Z., Kuropatwa E., Zalewska E., Zimowska B., 1998. Toxic effect of fungicides on the pathogenic fungi of hazel. Progr. Plant Protect/Post. Ochr. Roślin 38(2), 544–546.
Machowicz-Stefaniak Z., Zalewska E., Król E., 2012a. Pathogenicity of Phomopsis diachenii Sacc. isolates to caraway Carum carvi L. (Apiaceae). Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 11(2), 185–202.
Machowicz-Stefaniak Z., Zalewska E., Król, E., Kowalik B., 2012b. Growth and development of Phomopsis diachenii Sacc. in different culture conditions. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 11 (6), 69–80.
Mačkinaitė R., 2010. Fungi diversity on wild and cultivated common caraway (Carum carvi L.) seeds. Žemdirbystė=Agriculture 97(4), 73–84.
Mačkinaitė R., 2012. Potential pathogens of common caraway (Carum carvi L.) seeds and search for measures suppressing their spread. Žemdirbystė=Agriculture 99(2), 179–188.
Marcinkowska J., 2010. Oznaczanie rodzajów ważnych organizmów fitopatologicznych (Fungi, Oomycota, Plasmodiophorida). Wyd. SGGW, Warszawa.
Miczulski B., 1991. Podstawy praktycznej ochrony roślin. Wyd. AR, Lublin.
Mugnai L., Anzidei M., 1994. Casi di necrosi corticale da Phomopsis foeniculi del finoschio da seme in Italia. Petria 4(3), 237–244.
Orlikowski L.B., Skrzypczak Cz., Harnaj I., 2001a. Biological activity of grapefruit extract in the control of forme speciales of Fusarium oxysporum. J. Plant Prot. Res. 41(4), 104–111.
Orlikowski L.B., Skrzypczak Cz., Jaworska-Marosz A., 2001b. Influence of grapefruit extract on the growth and development of Botrytis spp. and grey mold development on lily and peony. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci., Biol. Sci. 49(4), 373–378.
Patrejko M., 2009. Możliwość ograniczania wzrostu i rozwoju Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Penz.) Sacc. za pomocą wybranych biopreparatów. Praca magisterska, UP w Lublinie.
Pięta D., Patkowska E., Pastucha A., 2004. Influence of biopreparations on growing and development of some pathegenic fungi. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 3(2), 171–177.
Rodeva R., Gabler J., 2004. First report of Phomopsis diachenii in Bulgaria. Mycol. Balcanica 1, 153–157.
Saccardo P.A., 1915. Notae mycologicae. Annals Mycol. 13, 115–138.
Sutton B.C., 1980. The Coelomycetes. Fungi Imperfecti with Pycnidia, Acrevuli and Stromata. Comm. Mycol. Inst., Kew Surrey, England.
Udayanga D., Liu X., McKenzie E.H.C., Chukeatirote E., Bahkali A.H.A., Hyde K.D., 2011. The genus Phomopsis: biology, applications, species concepts and names of common phytopathogenes. Fungal Divers. 50, 189–225.
Zalewska E., Machowicz-Stefaniak E., Król E., 2013. Occurrence of fungi on Angelica plants Archangelica officinalis Hoffm. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 12(2), 107–121.
University of Life Sciences in Lublin
University of Life Sciences in Lublin
University of Life Sciences in Lublin
License
Articles are made available under the conditions CC BY 4.0 (until 2020 under the conditions CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Submission of the paper implies that it has not been published previously, that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
The author signs a statement of the originality of the work, the contribution of individuals, and source of funding.
