Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
JASBB Baner text

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2023)

Articles

Evaluation of fattening suitability indices and slaughter quality of commercial heif-ers by Limousine bulls

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/jasbb.2023.4820
Submitted: June 29, 2022
Published: 2023-05-18

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the fattening suitability indices and slaughter value of 53 commercial heifers (PHB B-W × Limousine) fed semi-intensively. The results obtained in regard to daily gain, slaughter age, slaughter weight, hot carcass weight and dressing percentage, and carcass conformation and fatness according to EUROP scale were analysed in relation to housing system, limousine breed gene share, birth weight and post-fattening weight. It was found that heifers with 75% Limousine gene percentage achieved the highest slaughter weight and carcass weight, as well as the best conformation and highest fatness. Higher warm carcass weights and better conformation were characteristic of heifers kept untethered. On the other hand, the carcasses of heifers kept loose were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) more fatty (11.53 points, class 4–) compared to animals kept tethered (10.32 points, class 4), as well as obtaining a significantly (P ≤ 0.05) higher dressing percentage (61.2% vs. 60.2%). Heifers with higher birth weights were found to obtain significantly (P ≤ 0.05) higher slaughter weights.

References

  1. Bureš D., Bartoň L., 2012. Growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of bulls and heifers slaughtered at different ages. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 57, 34–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/5482-CJAS
  2. Choroszy Z., Choroszy B., Grodzki H., Szewczyk A., 2008. Wyniki oceny wartości użytkowej bydła ras mięsnych z uwzględnieniem oceny osobniczej buhajów. Przegl. Hod. 12, 6–10.
  3. Domaradzki P., Florek M., 2012. Mięso i przetwory mięsne. W: Towaroznawstwo surowców i produktów zwierzęcych z podstawami przetwórstwa, Litwińczuk Z. (red.). PWRiL, Warsza-wa, 287–392 ss.
  4. European Commission, 2009. Council regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 of 24 September 2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing. Official J. Eur. Union. L 303/1–30. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32009R1099&from=EN
  5. Grodzki H., 2011. Hodowla i użytkowanie bydła. Wyd. SGGW, Warszawa, 175–180.
  6. Irshad A., Kandeepan G., Kumar S., Ashish Kumar A., Vishnuraj M.R., Shukla V., 2012. Factors influencing carcass composition of livestock: a review. J. Anim. Prod. Adv., 3(5), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.5455/japa.20130531093231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/japa.20130531093231
  7. Kamieniecki H., Wójcik J., Pilarczyk R., Grzesiak W., Sobczak M., 2006. Porównanie wyników dysekcji tusz jałówek mieszańców pochodzących z opasu intensywnego. Acta Sci. Pol., Zoot. 5(2), 39–46.
  8. Kamieniecki H., Wójcik J., Pilarczyk R., Rzewucka E., Czerniawska-Piątkowska E., Durnaś B., 2005. Porównanie wymiarów tuszy oraz masy wyrębów jałówek mieszańców opasanych intensywnie. Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., supl., 22, 541–545.
  9. Klont R.E., Barnier V.M.H., Smulders F.J.M., van Dijk A., Hoving-Bolink A.H., Eikelenboom G., 1999. Post-mortem variation in pH, temperature, and colour profiles of veal carcasses in relation to breed, blood hemoglobin content, and carcass characteristics. Meat Sci., 53, 195–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00048-0
  10. Kossakowska J., Lewandowski R., 2007. Szanse rozwoju krajowego rynku wołowiny. Biul. Inf. ARR, 1(187), 4–9.
  11. Litwińczuk Z., Chabuz W., Domaradzki P., Jankowski P., 2012. Slaughter value of young Polish Black-and-White, White-Backed, Polish Holstein-Friesian and Limousin bulls under semi-intensive fattening. Ann. Anim. Sci., 12(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10220-012-0013-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10220-012-0013-7
  12. Makulska J., Węglarz A., 2006. Odchów cieląt ras mięsnych na pastwisku. Bydło 8, 34–35.
  13. Morales M., Folch C., Iraira S., Teuber N., Realini C.E., 2012. Nutritional quality of beef produced in Chile from different production systems. Chilean J. Agric. Res., 72, 80–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392012000100013
  14. Nelson S.T., Martin A.D., Holmøy I.H., Karlberg K., Nødtvedt A., 2016. A cross-sectional study of factors associated with birth weights of Norwegian beef calves. Prev. Vet. Med. 125 (1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.01.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.01.011
  15. Nogalski Z., Sobczuk-Szul M., Pogorzelska-Przybyłek P.,Wielgosz-Groth Z., Purwin C., Modzelewska-Kapituła M., 2016. Comparison of slaughter value for once-calved heifers and heifers of Polish Holstein-Friesian × Limousine crossbreds. Meat Sci. 117, 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.02.019
  16. Pesonen M., Huuskonen A., 2015. Production, carcass characteristics and valuable cuts of beef breed bulls and heifers in Finnish beef cattle production. Agric. Food Sci., 24, 164–172. https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.50930 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.50930
  17. Pilarczyk R., Wójcik J., 2007. Comparison of calf results and nursing cow performance in various beef breeds managed under the same conditions in north-western Poland. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 52, 325-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/2342-CJAS
  18. Pilarczyk R., Wójcik J., Rzewucka-Wójcik E., Błaszczyk P., Czerniak P., Szcześniak P., 2010. Ocena wyników odchowu cieląt czystorasowych oraz mieszańców z różnym udziałem genów rasy charolaise. Acta Sci. Pol., Zootechnica, 9(4), 191-198.
  19. Przysucha T., Gołębiewski M., Wnęk K., Slósarz J., Kunowska-Slósarz M., Balcerak M., 2018. Comparison of recording results of purebred and crossbred Limousine cattle in Poland. Ann. Warsaw Univ. Life Sci. – SGGW, Anim. Sci., 57(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.22630/ AAS.2018.57.1.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22630/AAS.2018.57.1.6
  20. PZHiPBM (Polski Związek Hodowców i Producentów Bydła Mięsnego), 2021. Ocena wartości użytkowej bydła ras mięsnych. Wyniki za rok 2020. Warszawa.
  21. Sadowska A., Rakowska R., Dybkowska E., Świąder K., 2016. Czynniki przedubojowe warunkujące wartość odżywczą i jakość sensoryczną mięsa wołowego. Post. Tech. Przetw. Spoż. 2, 122–128.
  22. Toro P., Catrileo A., Aguilar C., Vera R., 2009. Modelling supplementation strategies for beef steer rearing and fattening system in Southern Chile. Chilean J. Agric. Res. 69, 207–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392009000200010
  23. Wajda S., Daszkiewicz T., Januškevičienė G., Ailidavičienė J., 2006. Fattening results and carcass quality of young bulls produced by mating Polish Black-and-White cows to Charolaise and Simental sires. Vet. Med. Zoot., 33(55), 84–89.
  24. Węglarz A., 2010. Quality of beef from semi-intensively fattened heifers and bulls. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 28(3), 207–218.
  25. Zahradkova R., Bartoń L., Bureś D., Teslik V., Kudrna V., 2010. Comparison of growth performance and slaughter characteristics of Limousin and Charolais heifers. Archiv Tierzucht 53(5), 520-528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-53-520-2010

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.