Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 35 No. 1 (2017)

Articles

Analysis of effects of horses desensitization using the Natural Horsemanship method – assessment project

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/jasbb.2017.1.5
Submitted: June 26, 2019
Published: 2017-03-27

Abstract

The study assumes that there is a possibility of a measurable evaluation of individual effects of desensitization of young horses which can be useful in predicting their appropriable predispositions. The aim of the study was therefore to design a method for assessing the effects of desensitizing horses using a conglomerate of previously selected features. The study included 28 young half-breed stallions and mares, which were subjected to desensitization during three days, using the Silversand Horsemanship’s method. During desensitization consisting of ten elements partial HR and its duration were measured; besides, the horses were scored for their behavior. Based on the features selected for the greatest SD and the score for their value determined based on the assignment to five main compartments, a pattern to evaluate the effects of desensitization of stallions and mares was developed. The results were obtained through the multivariate analysis of variance and the t-Tukey’s test. It was found that a greater emotional stability, in not stereotyped situations, can be expected in stallions. Therefore, the effectiveness of desensitization should increase by adjusting its course to the horses’ sex. It should also be noted that a small variation of horses’ ratings given by the coach indicates that this type of method can be treated only as complementary to the measurable methods. It seems, therefore, that the use of the method proposed in this study, of how to assess the effects of desensitization through measurable and unmeasurable features that are the most changeable, can be helpful in selecting horses from which special psychological traits will be required.

References

Albinson C., 2006. In harmony with your horses. Dom Wydawniczy Bellona, 7, 21.

Allen W.R., 2005. The development and application of the modern reproductive technologies to horse breeding. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 40 (4), 310–329.

Christensen J.W., Rundgren M., Olsson K., 2006. Training methods for horses: habituation to a frightening stimulus. Equine Vet. J. 38 (5), 439–445.

Duberstein K., Gilkeson J., 2010. Determination of sex differences in personality and trainability of yearling horses utilizing a handler questionnaire. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 128 (1–4), 57–63.

Fureix C., Pagès M., Bon R., Lassalle J.M., Kuntz P., Gonzales G., 2009. A preliminary study of the effects of handling type on horses’ emotional reactivity and the human-horse relationship. Behav. Process. 82, 202–210.

Gehrke K.E., 2009. Developing coherent leadership in partnership with horses. A New approach to leadership training. J. Res. Innov. Teach. 21, 222–234.

Gill J., 2003. Fizjologia konia. Wydaw. Sport, Warszawa.

Goodwin D., 2007. Equine learning behaviour: what we know, what we don’t know and priorities for future research. Behav. Process. 76,17–19.

Hausberger M., Gautier E., Muller C., Jego P., 2007. Lower learning abilities in stereotypic horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 107, 299–306.

Janczarek I., Stachurska A., Kędzierski W., Wilk I., 2013. Responses of horses of various breeds to a sympathetic training method. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 33 (10), 794–801.

Kędzierski W., Janczarek I., Stachurska A., 2012. Emotional Response of Naïve Purebred Arabian Colts and Fillies to Sympathetic and Traditional Training Methods. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 32 (11), 752–756.

Lewczuk D., 2008. Analiza systemu sędziowania zdolności skokowych koni w skokach luzem za pomocą komputerowej analizy obrazu. Monografie i Rozprawy, z. 21, Instytut Genetyki i Hodowli Zwierząt PAN w Jastrzębcu.

McBride S.D., Mills D.S., 2012. Psychological factors affecting equine performance. BMC Vet. Res. 8 (1), 180.

McCall C.A., 1990. A review of learning behavior in horses and its application in horse training. J. Anim. Sci. 68, 75–81.

McDonnell S.M., 2003. The equid ethogram: a practical field guide to horse behavior. Eclipse Press, 24–33.

McLean A.N., McGreevy P.D., 2010. Horse–training techniques that may defy the principles of learning theory and compromise welfare. J. Vet. Behav. 5 (4). 187–195.

Miller R., 2007. Natural horsemanship explained. From heart to hands. Agencja PDM, 31, 33, 84.

Murphy J., Arkins S., 2007. Equine learning behaviour. Behav. Process. 76, 1–13.

Santamaria S., Bobbert M.E., Back W., Barneveld A., Weeren Van R.P., 2004. Variation in free jumping technique within and among horses with little experience in show jumping. Am. J. Vet. Res. 65 (7), 938–944.

Silversand Natural Horsemanship Programme, 2003. Basic skills 1, 8–21.

Thomas R., 2010. Predictability in an unpredictable environment: training the police horse using learning theory. J. Vet. Behav. 5 (4), 218.

Visser E.K., van Reenen C.G., van der Werf J.T., Schilder M.B., Knaap J.H., Barneveld A., Blokhuis H.J., 2002. Heart rate and heart rate variability during a novel object test and a han-dling test in young horses. Physiol. Behav. 76, 289–296.

Visser E.K., VanDierendonck M., Ellis A.D., Rijksen C., Van Reenen C.G., 2009. A comparison of sympathetic and conventional training methods on responses to initial horse training. Vet. J. 181 (1), 48–52.

Wilk I., Janczarek I., 2015. Relationship between behavior and cardiac response to round pen training. J. Vet. Behav. 10 (3), 231–236.

www.europeanpoliceunion.eu, 2016.

www.pzhk.pl, 2016.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.