Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Agronomy Science Baner text

Vol. 75 No. 1 (2020)

Articles

Profitability of using biostimulants in cultivation of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) ‘Orzeł’

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2020.1.2
Submitted: September 5, 2019
Published: 01.04.2020

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the profitability of using the biostimulants in cultivation of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) ‘Orzeł’. The field studies were carried out in 2016–2018. Bean seeds of ‘Orzeł’ cultivar were sown every year in the first 10-day period of May. During the growing season, following biostimulants were used: Asahi SL (at concertation 0.1 and 0.2%), Kelpak SL (at concertation 0.7 and 1%), Terra Sorb Complex (at concertation 0.3 and 0.5%), in the form of a single (BBCH 12−13) or double spraying (BBCH 12−13 and BBCH 61). After harvesting the plants, the seed yield (t·ha–1) from each plot was determined and the profitability of using biostimulants was assessed. The biostimulants used increased the bean seed yield in 14% and had a positive effect on the profitability of using the preparations, however, the effect obtained depended on the concentration and climatic conditions during the study years. In 2016 and 2017, single spraying with both Asahi SL concentrations was economically the most profitable. On the other hand, in the last year of study, it was more advantageous to apply higher concentration of this preparation, as well as to apply Kelpak SL at lower concentration. Single spraying (BBCH 12−13) at higher concentration (0.2%) of Asahi SL was the most cost-effective.

References

  1. Budzyński W., Dubis B., Jankowski A., 2008. Response of winter oilseed rape to the biostimulator Asahi SL applied in spring. W: Z.T. Dąbrowski (red.), Biostimulators in modern agriculture: field crops. Wieś Jutra, Warszawa, 47−55.
  2. Calvo P., Nelson L., Kloepper J.W., 2014. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil 383(1−2), 3−41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8
  3. Du Jardin P., 2015. Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Sci. Hortic., 196, 3−14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021
  4. Dwivedi S.K., Kumar A., Pal A., Sriwastava L.K., Meshram M., 2016. Effect of seaweed saps on growth, nutrient uptake and yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Appl. Biol. Res. 18(1), 1−7. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-4517.2016.00001.X
  5. Ertani A., Pizzeghello D., Francioso O., Sambo P., Sanchez-Cortez S., Nadi S., 2014. Capsicum chinensis L. growth and nutraceutical properties are enhanced by biostimulants in a long-term period: chemical and metabolomics approaches. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 1−12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00375
  6. Kocira A., 2017. Biostymulatory w uprawie soi jako czynnik determinujący cechy biometryczne, plon i skład chemiczny nasion. Monogr. Rozpr. Nauk. IUNG 54, 84−88.
  7. Kocira A., Kocira S., Świeca M., Złotek U., Jakubczyk A., Kapela K., 2017. Effect of foliar application of a nitrophenolate-based biostimulant on the yield and quality of two bean cultivars. Sci. Hortic. 214, 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.11.021
  8. Marhoon I.A., Abbas M.K., 2015. Effect of foliar application of seaweed extract and amino acids on some vegetative and anatomical characters of two sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivars. Int. J. Res. Stud. Agric. Sci. (IJRSAS), 1(1), 35−44.
  9. Prabhu M., Kumar A.R., Rajamani K., 2009. Influence of biostimulants on growth, yield and economics of kalmegh, Andrographis paniculata. Madras Agric. J. 96(1−6), 150−155.
  10. Prabhu M., Kumar A.R., Rajamani K., 2010. Influence of different organic substances on growth and herb yield of sacred basil (Ocimum sanctum L.). Ind. J. Agric. Res. 44, 48−52.
  11. Pramanick B., Bramachari K., Ghosh A., Zodape S.T., 2014. Foliar nutrient management through Kappaphycus and Gracilaria saps in rice-potato-green gram crop sequence. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 73, 613−617.
  12. Sau S., Sarkar S., Sarkar T., Ghosh B., 2016. Influential role of Biozyme on yield, leaf nutrient and quality of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. Allahabad safeda. Bioscan, Suppl. Agron. 11(4), 2679−2682.
  13. Szparaga A., Kocira S., Kocira A., Czerwińska E., Świeca M., Lorencowicz E., Koszel M., Oniszczuk T., 2018. Modification of growth, yield, and the nutraceutical and antioxidative potential of soybean through the use of synthetic biostimulants. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1401. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01401
  14. Zarzecka K., Gugała M., Głuszczak B., Mystkowska I., 2018. Ekonomiczne uzasadnienie stosowania herbicydów i biostymulatorów w uprawie ziemniaków jadalnych. Rocz. Nauk. Stow. Ekon. Rol. Agrobiz. 20, 169–173.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.