Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Agronomy Science Baner text

Vol. 75 No. 4 (2020)

Articles

Phenotypic yield and its structure variability of moderately late and late potato cultivars

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2020.4.2
Submitted: April 9, 2020
Published: 12.11.2020

Abstract

The breeding of new potato cultivars of a given earliness group is closely related to the knowledge of the range of variability and interdependence of traits in a given year and between years. The research results were based on the field experience conducted in 2010–2012, in Central-Eastern Poland (51°34'N, 23°02'E), on lessive, slightly acidic soil. The experiment was carried out in a randomized block design in triplicate. Seventeen medium late and late potato cultivars were tested. Agronomic and plant protection treatments were carried out following the principles of good agricultural practice. The variability of potato economic characteristics was assessed through variance analysis, variance component analysis, cluster analysis, and principal component analysis (PCA). The years of research (52.5–94.6%) have played a dominant role in the phenotypic variability of general yield, commercial and seed yield, and their structure. The genetic factor was from 1.3 to 24.1%, and the interaction of the cultivar × years – from 3.1 to 61.7% of the variance share in the total variance. The analysis of the main components has identified four groups of cultivars with specific properties. They can be used in the decision-making system of breeding the new potato creations.

References

  1. Ahmad H.M., Awan S.I., Aziz O., Ali M.A., 2014., Multivariative analysis of some metric traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Eur. J. Biotechnol. Biosci. 1(4), 22–26.
  2. Annicchiarico P., 2002. Genotype-environment interactions: challenges and opportunities for plant breeding and cultivar recommendations. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper No. 174. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
  3. Annicchiarico P., Pecetti L., Abdelguerfi A., Bouizgaren A., Carroni A.M., Hayek T., Bouzina M.H., Mezni M., 2011. Adaptation of landrace and variety germplasm and selection strategies for lucerne in the Mediterranean basin. Field Crops Res. 120, 283–291.
  4. Arvanitoyannis I.S., Mavromatis A.G., Vaitsi O., Korkovelos A., Golia E., 2012. Effect of genotype and geographical origin on potato properties (physical and sensory) for authenticity purposes. J. Agric. Sci. 4(4), 63–74.
  5. Balzarini M., Teich I., Bruno C., Peña A., 2011. Making genetic biodiversity measurable: A review of statistical multivariate methods to study variability at gene level. Rev. Fac. Cienc. Agrar. 43(1), 261–275.
  6. Bhandari H.R., Bhanu A.N., Srivastava K., Singh M.N., Shreya I., 2017. Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Crop Plants – An Overview. Adv. Plants. Agric. Res. 7(3), 00255. https://doi.org/10.15406/apar.2017.07.00255
  7. Bleinholder H., Buhr L., Feller C., Hack H., Hess M., Klose R., Meier U., Stauss R., van den Boom T., Weber E., Lancashire P.D., Munger P., 2005. Compendium of growth stage identification keys for mono- and dicotyledonous plants. Poznań, Poland, 152 pp.
  8. Carputo D., Alioto D., Aversano1 R., Garramone R., Miraglia V., Villano1i C., Frusciante L., 2013. Genetic diversity among potato species as revealed by phenotypic resistances and SSR markers. Plant Genet. Resour. 11(2), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262112000500
  9. Cooper J.M., Schmidt C.S., Wilkinson A., Lueck L., Hall C.M., Schotton P.N., Leifert C., 2006. Effect of organic, low – input and conventional production systems on disease incidence and severity in winter wheat. Asp. Appl. Biol. 80, 121–126.
  10. Das A.B., Mohanty I.C., Mahapatra D., Mohanty S., Ray A., 2010. Genetic variation of Indian potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) genotypes using chromosomal and RAPD markers. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol 10(3), 238–246.
  11. Flis B., Domański L., Zimnoch-Guzowska E., Polar Z., Pousa S.A., Pawlak A., 2014. Stability Analysis of Agronomic Traits in Potato Cultivars of Different Origin. Am. J. Potato Res. 91(4), 404–413.
  12. Fu Yong Bi., 2015. Understanding crop genetic diversity under modern Plant Breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 128(11), 2131–2142.
  13. Gauch H.G., Piepho H.P., Annicchiarico P., 2008. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: Further considerations. Crop Sci. 48, 866–889.
  14. Kamiński P., 2015. Ocena stabilności plonu i właściwości kulinarnych bulw ziemniaka na Phytophthora infestans [Comparative assessment and culinary properties of potato tubers resistant to Phytophtho-ra infestans]. Doctoral dissertation. IHAR-PIB, Radzików, pp. 194.
  15. Marcinek J., Komisarek J., 2011. Systematyka gleb Polski. Rocz. Glebozn. 62(3), 1–193. Wyd. „Wieś Jutra”, Warszawa.
  16. Mocek A., Drzymała S., 2010. Geneza, analiza i klasyfikacja gleb. Wyd. UP, Poznań, pp. 418.
  17. Mocek A., 2015. Soil science. State Scientific Publisher, Warsaw, pp. 571
  18. Mohammed W., Ali S., Shimelis B., Burga S., 2015. Genetic diversity of local and introduced sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) collections for agromorphology and physico-chemical attributes in Ethiopia. Sci. Technol. Arts Res. J. 4(1), 9–19.
  19. Patel A.B., Patel R.N., Gami R.A., Patel J.A., Patel P.C., 2018. Genetic Variability Among the Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Genotypes as Affected by Harvesting Period for Processing Purpose and Tuber Yield. Curr. Agric. Res. J. 6(3), 372–377.
  20. PN-R-0403:1997. Analiza chemiczno-rolnicza gleby. Pobieranie próbek.
  21. PTG, 2008. Klasyfikacja uziarnienia gleb i utworów mineralnych. Polskie Towarzystwo Gleboznawcze, pp. 10.
  22. Pszczółkowski P., Sawicka B., 2017. Phenotypic variability of the yield and its structure of mid-early potato cultivars. Acta Sci. Pol. Agricultura 16(3),147–161.
  23. Rahajeng W., Rahayuningsih S.A., 2017. Diversity of sixty-two sweet potato accessions. Biodiversitas 18(1), 95–100.
  24. Regulation of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development 29, (2003) on Detailed Requirements for Commercial Quality of Potatoes; Dz.U. 2003, No 194, item 1900; ISAP – Internet System of Legal Acts, Warsaw, Poland, 2003, pp. 13086–13088. http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/Doc
  25. Roztropowicz S., 1999. Methodology of Observation, Measurements and Sampling in Agricultural Experiments with Potatoes; Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: Section Jadwisin, Poland, 1999; pp. 1–50. (In Polish).
  26. Rymuza K., Turska E., Wielogorska G., Bombik A., 2012. Use of principal component analysis for the assessment of spring wheat characteristics. Acta Sci. Pol. Agricultura, 11(1), 79–90.
  27. Rymuza K., Zarzecka K., Gugała M., 2013. Przydatność wielowymiarowej analizy porównawczej do oceny jakościowej bulw ziemniaka [Suitability of multidimensional comparative analysis for tuber quality assessment of potatoes]. Fragm. Agron., 30(2),134–142.
  28. Rymuza K., 2015. Multi-trait evaluation of value for cultivation and use of early maturing edible potato cultivars registered in Poland. J. Ecol. Eng. 16(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/586
  29. Ryzak M., Bartminski P., Bieganowski A., 2009. Metody wyznaczania rozkładu granulometrycznego gleb mineralnych [Methods of determination of ‎granulometric ‎distribution of mineral soils]. Acta Agrophys.‎‎, Rozpr. Monogr. 175(4), pp. 84.
  30. SAS Institute Inc., 2008. SAS/STAT®9.2 User’s Guide. Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc.
  31. Sawicka B., Michałek W., Pszczółkowski P., 2015. Dependence of chemical composition of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers on physiological indicators. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 102(1), 41–50.
  32. Sawicka B., Noaema A.H., Seead Hameed T., Skiba D., 2016. Genotype and environmental variability of chemical elements in potato tubers. Acta Sci. Pol. Agricultura 15(3), 79–91.
  33. Skowera B., Kopcińska J., Kopeć B., 2014. Changes in thermal and precipitation conditions in Poland in 1971–2010. Ann. Warsaw Univ. Life Sci. SGGW, Land Reclam., 46(2), 153–162.
  34. Solankey S.S., Singh P.K., Singh R.K., 2015. Genetic diversity and interrelationship of qualitative and quantitative traits in sweet potato. Intl. J. Veget. Sci. 21(3), 236–248.
  35. Stefańczyk E., Sobkowiak S., Brylińska M., Śliwka J., 2017. Expression of the potato late blight resistance gene Rpi-phu1 and Phytophthora infestans effectors in the compatible and incompatible interactions in potato. Phytopathology 107, 740–748.
  36. Wang Y., Rashid M.A., Li X., Yao Ch., Lu L., Bai J., Li Y., Xu N., Yang Q., Zhang L., Bryan G.J., Sui Q., Zhechao P., 2019. Collecting and assessing the genetic diversity and population structure of sites and potato varieties in China. Plant Sci. 21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00139
  37. WRB, 2014. World reference database for soil resources. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3794e.pdf

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.