Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
Agronomy Science Baner text

Tom 76 Nr 3 (2021)

Artykuły

Wpływ sposobu uprawy, nawożenia i herbicydów na aktywność biologiczną gleby i plonowanie jęczmienia jarego

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2021.3.5
Przesłane: 2 lipca 2021
Opublikowane: 19-11-2021

Abstrakt

The results of the research devoted to the change of the biological composition of the soil under the conditions of activation of microbiological vital activity and increase in the number of earthworms in the technology of spring barley cultivation are presented. It was found that the organic system of growing crops against the background of manure, cereal straw and green manure in comparison with the organo-mineral system obtained a positive dynamics of decomposition of linen tissue and the development of earthworms in the soil.
The highest grain yield was formed by agrocenosis of spring barley with the introduction of Lancelot 450 WG – 0.033 kg·ha–1 + Axial 50 EC – 1 dm3·ha–1 (tube exit phase) – 4900 kg·ha–1 and 4700 kg·ha–1 for organo-mineral and organic fertilizer systems in accordance.

Bibliografia

  1. Baćmaga M., Kucharski J., Wyszkowska J., 2007. Wpływ środków ochrony roślin na aktywność mikrobiologiczną gleby [Influence of plant protection products on the microbiological activity of soil]. J. Elem. 12(3), 225–239 [in Polish].
  2. Budonnyy YU.V., Shevchenko M.V., 2006. Urozhaynist i zaburyanenist posiviv tsukrovoho buryaka zalezhno vid sposobiv osnovnoho obrobitku gruntu ta herbitsydiv. Kompleksni doslidzhennya roslyn-eksprelentiv i systemy zakhystu ornykh zemel v Ukrayini vid buryaniv [Yield and weediness of sugar beet crops depending on the confessions of the main tillage and herbicides. Comprehensive study of explant plants and systemic protection of arable lands in Ukraine from weeds]. K. Koloobih, 29–32 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Demydas G., Zakhlebaev M., Shuvar I., Lipińska H., Wyłupek T., 2020. The formation of the leaf surface of white melilot (Melilotus albus) depending on fertilization, seed mix and seeding rate. Agron. Sci. 75(4), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2020.4.9
  4. Dospekhov B.A., Vasil’ev I.P., Tulikov A.M., 1977. Praktikum po zemledeliyu [Workshop on agriculture]. Kolos, Moskva, pp. 368 [in Russian].
  5. Dospekhov B.A., 1985. Metodyka polevoho opyta [Methodology of the field experience]. Kolos, Moskva, pp. 351 [in Russian].
  6. Farooq M.K., Siddique H.M., Rehman H., Aziz T., Lee D.-J., Wahid A., 2011. Rice direct seeding: experiences, challenges and opportunities. Soil Till. Res. 111, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.10.008
  7. Feledyn-Szewczyk B., Berbeć A.K., Radzikowski P., 2017. Rola dżdżownic w kształtowaniu jakości gleb oraz wpływ różnych zabiegów agrotechnicznych na ich występowanie [The role of earthworms in shaping soil quality and the impact of various agrotechnical treatments on their occurrence]. Studia i Raporty IUNG-PIB 54(8), 57–71 [in Polish]. https://doi.org/10.26114/sir.iung.2017.54.04.
  8. Flohre A., Rudnick M., Traser G., Tscharntke T., Eggers T., 2011. Does soil biota benefit from organic farming in complex vs. simple landscape? Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 141(1–2), 210–214.
  9. Gallego S.M., Benavídes M.P., Tomaro M.L., 1996. Effect of heavy metal ion excess on sunflower leaves: evidence for involvement of oxidative stress. Plant Sci. 121(2), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(96)04528-1
  10. Horodniy M.M., Melnyk S.I., Malynovskyy A.S., Bondar O.I., 2003. Ahrokhimiya: pidruchnyk [Agrochemistry: textbook]. Kyiv, TOV “Alefa”, 778 [in Ukrainian].
  11. Hryńczuk B., Weber R., 2004. Wpływ sposobu uprawy roli na intensywność przemian mikrobiologicznych w glebie i plonowanie roślin [The influence of the mode of tillage on the intensity of microbiological changes in soil and the yielding of crops]. Ann. UMCS, Sect. E, Agricult. 59(2), 639–648 [in Polish].
  12. Irmler U., 2010. Changes in earthworm populations during conversion from conventional to organic farming. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 135(3), 194–198.
  13. Kłyś M., Malejky N., 2017. Gleba – środowisko życia wielu organizmów [Soil – the living environment of many organisms]. Eduk. Biol. Śr. 4, 41–46 [in Polish].
  14. Kocira A., Staniak M., Tomaszewska M., Kornas R., Cymerman J., Panasiewicz K., Lipińska H., 2020. Legume cover crops as one of the elements of strategic weed management and soil quality improvement. A review. Agriculture 10(9), 394. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10090394
  15. Kraska P., Andruszczak S., Kwiecińska-Poppe E., Pałys E., 2013. Effect of chemical crop protection on the content of some elements in grain of spelt wheat (Triticum aestivum ssp. spelta). J. Elem. 18(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2013.18.1.06.
  16. Kulinich O.I., Kulinich R.O. (eds.), 2010. Teoriya statystyky [Theory of statistics]. Kyyiv, Znannya, pp. 239 [in Ukrainian].
  17. Meena M.S., Singh K.M., 2013. Conservation agriculture: innovations, constraints and strategies for adoption. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 49380. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/49380/ [access: 25.06.2021].
  18. Melnyk I.P., Kolesnik N.M., Shuvar I.A., Sendetsky V.M., Titov I.M., 2015. Earthworms: scientific aspects of cultivation and practical significance, Ivano-Frankivsk, pp. 444 [in Ukrainian].
  19. Mubeen K., Nadeem M.A., Tanveer A., Jhala A.J., 2014. Effects of seeding time and weed control methods in direct seededrice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Ani. Plant Sci. 24(2), 534–542.
  20. Myshustyn E.N., Petrova A.N., 1963. Opredelenye byolohycheskoy aktyvnosty pochvy [Determination of biological activity of soil]. Mykrobyolohyya 31(3), 479–483 [in Ukrainian].
  21. Natywa M., Selwet M., Maciejewski T., 2014. Wpływ wybranych czynników agrotechnicznych na liczebność i aktywność drobnoustrojów glebowych [Effect of some agrotechnical factors on the number and activity soil microorganisms]. Fragm. Agron. 31(2), 56–63 [in Polish].
  22. Noskov B.S., 1999. Shlyakhy pidvyshchennya rodyuchosti gruntiv u suchasnykh umovakh silskohospodarskoho
  23. vyrobnytstva [The way to increase soil fertility in modern conditions of agricultural production]. Ahrarna Nauka, Kyiv, 155 [in Ukrainian].
  24. Pankiv Z.P., 2017. Soils of Ukraine: a textbook. Ivan Franko Lviv National University, Lviv, pp. 112 [in Ukrainian].
  25. Pannacci E., Tei F., 2014. Effects of mechanical and chemical methods on weed control, weed seed rain and crop yield in maize, sunflower and soyabean. Crop Protect. 64, 51–59.
  26. Peralta A.L., Sun Y., McDaniel M.D., Lennon J.T., 2018. Crop rotational diversity increases disease suppressive capacity of soil microbiomes. Ecosphere 9(5), e02235. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2235
  27. Pfiffner L., 2014. Earthworms – architects of fertile soils. Their significance and recommendations for their promotion in agriculture. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, FIBL; TILMAN-ORG project Consortium, Switzerland, pp. 9. https://orgprints.org/id/eprint/30567/1/1629-earthworms.pdf [access: 21.03.2021].
  28. Runowska-Hryńczuk B., 1992. Przydatność wskaźników aktywności biologicznej gleby do oceny stanu jej żyzności [Usefulness of soil biological activity indicators for the assessment of soil fertility]. Puł. 100, 187–199 [in Polish].
  29. Sellam V., Poovammal E., 2016. Prediction of crop yield using regression analysis. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 9(38), 1–5. https://dx.doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i38/91714
  30. Shastry A., Sanjay H.A., Bhanusree E., 2017. Prediction of crop yield using regression techniques. Int. J. Soft Comput. 12(2), 96–102. https://medwelljournals.com/abstract/?doi=ijscomp.2017.96.102 [access: 1.04.2021].
  31. Shuvar I.A., Boyko I.Y.E., 2011. Osoblyvosti zminy tsenozu buryaniv u korotkorotatsiyniy sivozmini Zakhidnoho Lisostepu Ukrayiny [Pericularities of weed coenosis change in short-rotation crop rotation of the Western Forest-Steppe of Ukraine]. Naukovyy visnyk NUBiP Ukrayiny 162, 27–34 [in Ukrainian].
  32. Shuvar I.A., Gudz V.P., Shuvar A.M., Krushynskyy O.P., 2011. Ekoloho-herbolohichnyy monitorynh i prohnoz v ahrotsenozakh, Ukrainski Tekhnolohiyi, Lviv. 208 [in Ukrainian].
  33. Shuvar I.A., Korpita H.M. 2016. Vplyv elementiv tekhnolohiyi vyroshchuvannya na zaburyanenist ta produktyvnist yachmenyu yaroho i kartopli [Influence of elements of cultivation technology on weediness and productivity of spring baley and potatoes]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats natsionalnoho naukovoho tsentru „Instytut zemlerobstva NAAN” 3–4, 71–81 [in Ukrainian].
  34. Shuvar I.A., Korpita H.M., Yunyk A.V., 2019. Produktyvnist yachmenyu yaroho i kartopli v ahrotsenozakh zakhidnoho Lisostepu Ukrayiny: monohrafiya [Productivity of spring barley and potato in agrocenoses of the western Forest-steppe of Ukraine: monograph]. Ukrayinski Tekhnolohiyi, Lviv, pp. 152 [in Ukrainian].
  35. Shuvar I., Korpita H., 2020. Herbological condition and herbicide control of potato agrophytocenosis in the western part of Ukraine. Folia Pomer. Univ. Technol. Stetin., Agric., Aliment., Pisc., Zootech. 355(54), 31–38.
  36. Singh S., Ladha J.K., Gupta R.K., Bhushan L., Rao A.N., Sivaprasad B., Singh P.P., 2007. Evaluation of mulching, intercropping with Sesbania and herbicide use for weed managment in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.). Crop Protect. 26(4), 518–524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2006.04.024
  37. Singh R., Serawat M., Singh A., Babli A., 2018. Effect of tillage and crop residue management on soil physical properties. J. Soil Salin. Water Qual. 10(2), 200–206.
  38. Tanchyk S.P., Petryshyna A.A., Petryshyna V.A., 2010. Formuvannya buryanovoho komponenta ahrofitotsenozu horokhu zalezhno vid system zemlerobstva [Formation of weed component of pea agrophytocenosis depending on farming systems. Quarantine and plant protection]. Karantyn Zakh. Ros. 9, 15–18 [in Ukrainian].
  39. Tarariko YU.O., Nesmashna O.YE., 1998. Ekoloho-enerhetychna otsinka hruntiv [Ecological and energy evaluation of soils]. Ahroekolohiya i biotekhnolohiya 2, 412 [in Ukrainian].
  40. Titov I., 2012. Earthworms, pp. 352 [in Russian].
  41. Tyburski J., Makulec G. (eds.), 2013. Fauna gleb użytkowanych rolniczo a ich urodzajność [Fauna of agricultural soils and their fertility]. Wyd. UWM, Olsztyn [in Polish].
  42. Winnicki T., Żuk-Gołaszewska K., 2017. Agronomic and economic characteristics of common wheat and spelt production in an organic farming system. Acta Sci. Pol. Agric. 16, 247–254.
  43. Wyszkowski M., Wyszkowska J., 2004. Współzależność między zawartością makroelementów w jęczmieniu jarym a aktywnością enzymatyczną gleby zanieczyszczonej Chwastoxem Trio 540
  44. SL i Granstarem 75 WG [Correlation between the content of macroelements in spring barley and the enzymatic activity of soil contaminated with Chwastox Trio 540 SL and Granstar 75 WG]. Ann. UMCS, S. E, Agric. 54(4), 1639–1649 [in Polish].
  45. Yatsuk I.P. (ed.), 2015. Periodic report on the condition of soils on land of agricultural purpose of Ukraine, pp. 102.
  46. Zrazhevsky A., 1957. Earthworms as a factor in the fertility of forest soils, pp. 272.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Inne teksty tego samego autora

1 2 3 > >> 

Podobne artykuły

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.