Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Agronomy Science Baner text

Vol. 78 No. 1 (2023)

Articles

Yield and total protein content of mixtures of blue lupin and spring triticale grown for green matter in sustainable agriculture

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2023.4924
Submitted: September 23, 2022
Published: 09.06.2023

Abstract

Progressive climate change and an increase in the level of environmental pollution make it necessary to search for crops with stable yields and the lowest possible impact on the environment. This paper presents the results of a 2016–2018 study that aimed to evaluate the yield and total protein content of mixtures of blue lupin with spring triticale. Two factors were studied in the experiment: I. the proportion of components in the mixture: blue lupine – pure sowing 100%, spring triticale – pure sowing 100%, blue lupine 75% + spring triticale 25%, blue lupine 50% + spring triticale 50%, blue lupine 25% + spring triticale 75%; II. harvest date: flowering stage of blue lupine (BBCH 65), flat green pod stage of blue lupine (BBCH 79). The highest fresh and dry matter yield was obtained from a mixture of blue lupine and spring triticale with an equal share of both components harvested at the flat green pod stage of blue lupine. The highest total protein content, among the mixtures, was characterized by the mixture of blue lupin with spring triticale with a share of components of 75% + 25%, respectively, harvested at the flowering stage of blue lupin.

References

  1. Agegnehu G., Ghizaw A., Sinebo W., 2006. Yield performance and land-use efficiency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Ethiopian highlands. Eur. J. Agron. 25(3), 202207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.05.002
  2. Amine-Khodja I.R., Boscari A., Riah N., Kechid M., Maougal R.T., Belbekri N., Djekoun A., 2022. Impact of two strains of Rhizobium leguminosarum on the adaptation to terminal water deficit of two cultivars Vicia faba. Plants 11(4), 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11040515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11040515
  3. Ayub M., Shoaib M., 2009. Studies on fodder yield and quality of sorghum grown alone and in mixture with guara under different planting techniques. Pakistan J. Agric. Sci. 46(1), 25–29.
  4. Bacchi M., Monti M., Calvi A., Lo Presti E., Pellicanò A., Preiti G., 2021. Forage potential of cereal/legume intercrops: agronomic performances, yield, quality forage and LER in two har-vesting times in a mediterranean environment. Agronomy 11(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11010121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11010121
  5. Bojarszczuk J., Księżak J., Staniak M., 2014. Evaluation of yielding of oat – pea mixtures cultivated in organic farming. J. Res. Applic. Agric. Eng. 59(3), 12–17.
  6. Buraczyńska D., Ceglarek F., 2009. Plon i skład chemiczny nasion mieszanek strączkowo – zbożo-wych. Fragm. Agron. 26(3), 15 – 24.
  7. Faligowska A., Selwet M., Panasiewicz K., Szymańska G., 2014. Quality and hygienic conditions of white lupin silage, affected by forage stage of growth and use of silage additives. Turk. J. Field Crops. 19(2), 252–257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.18561
  8. Gecaitė V., Arlauskienė A., Cesevičienė J., 2021. Competition effects and productivity in oat–forage legume relay intercropping systems under organic farming conditions. Agriculture 11(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020099
  9. Komisja Europejska, 2019. Komunikat Komisji do Parlamentu Europejskiego, Rady Europejskiej, Rady, Europejskiego Komitetu Ekonomiczno-Społecznego i Komitetu Regionów, Europejski Zielony Ład, COM(2019) 640 final.
  10. Komisja Europejska, 2020. Komunikat Komisji do Parlamentu Europejskiego, Rady Europejskiej, Rady, Europejskiego Komitetu Ekonomiczno-Społecznego i Komitetu Regionów, Unijna stra-tegia na rzecz bioróżnorodności 2030 Przywracanie przyrody do naszego życia COM(2020) 380 final.
  11. Kotecki A. (red.), 2014. Współrzędna uprawa bobiku i łubinu żółtego z pszenżytem jarym. Wyd. UP Wrocław, ss. 104.
  12. Kotwica K., Rudnicki F., 2004. Efekty uprawy jarych mieszanek zbożowych i zbożowo-strączkowych na glebie kompleksu żytniego dobrego. Acta Sci. Pol. Agric. 3(1), 149–156.
  13. Krga İ., Sımıć A., Mandıć V., Bıjelıć Z., Dželetovıć, Z., Vasıljevıć S., Adžıć S., 2019. Forage yield and protein content of different field pea cultivars and oat mixtures grown as winter crops . Turk. J. Field Crops 24(2), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.643524 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.643524
  14. Księżak J., Bojarszczuk J., Staniak M., 2016. Evaluation of yielding of mixtures of Pisum
  15. sativum L. with Triticum aestivum L. grown in organic farming. Acta Agrobot. 69(3), 1681. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/aa.1681 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.1681
  16. Księżak J., Staniak M., 2009. Ocena mieszanek strączkowo – zbożowych uprawianych ekologicznie jako surowca do produkcji kiszonek. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng. 54(3), 157–163.
  17. Makarewicz A., Płaza A., Gąsiorowska B., Cybulska A., 2015. Zawartość składników pokarmo-wych w mieszankach łubinu wąskolistnego z żytem jarym uprawianych na zieloną masę. Ann. UMCS, Sect. E Agric. 70(3), 73–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2015.3.8
  18. Noworolnik K., 2000. Mieszanki zbożowo-strączkowe w systemie rolnictwa równoważonego. Pam. Puł. 120(2), 325–329.
  19. Płaza A., Gąsiorowska B., Makarewicz A., 2014. Białko w mieszankach łubinu wąskolistnego z żytem jarym uprawianych na zieloną masę. Fragm. Agron. 31(2), 64–73.
  20. Piltz J.W., Rodham C.A., Wilkins J.F., Hackney B.F., 2021. A comparison of cereal and cere-al/vetch crops for fodder conservation. Agriculture 11(5), 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11050459 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11050459
  21. Piltz J.W., Rodham C.A., 2022. Effect of sowing rate and maturity on the yield and nutritive value of triticale–field pea forage crops. Sustainability 14(6), 3637. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063637 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063637
  22. Rad S.V., Valadabadi S.A.R., Pouryousef M., Saifzadeh S., Zakrin H.R., Mastinu A., 2020. Quan-titative and qualitative evaluation of Sorghum bicolor L. under intercropping with legumes and different weed control methods. Horticulturae 6(4), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae6040078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae6040078
  23. Sohail S., Ansar M., Skalicky M., Wasaya A., Soufan W., Ahmad Yasir T., El-Shehawi A.M., Brestic M., Sohidul Islam M., Ali Raza M., EL Sabagh A., 2021. Influence of tillage systems and cereals–legume mixture on fodder yield, quality and net returns under rainfed conditions. Sustainability 13(4), 2172. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042172
  24. Soufan W., Al-Suhaibani N.A., 2020. Optimizing yield and quality of silage and hay for pea–barley mixtures ratio under irrigated arid environments. Sustainability 13(24), 13621. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413621
  25. Swarnalakshmi K., Yadav V., Tyagi D., Dhar D.W., Kannepalli A., Kumar S., 2020. Significance of plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria in grain legumes: Growth promotion and crop pro-duction. Plants 9(11), 1596. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111596
  26. Szpunar-Krok E., Bobrecka-Jamro D., Tobiasz-Salach R., 2009a. Plonowanie owsa nagoziarnistego i bobiku uprawianych w siewie czystym i w mieszankach. Fragm. Agron. 26(2), 145–151.
  27. Szpunar-Krok E., Bobrecka-Jamro D., Tobiasz-Salach R., Kubit P., 2009b. Skład chemiczny ziarna owsa nagoziarnistego i nasion bobiku uprawnianego w siewie czystym i w mieszankach. Frag. Agron. 26(2), 152–157.
  28. Wiśniewska M., Boros D., Zych J., 2020. Wartość pokarmowa wybranych mieszanek zbóż jarych z roślinami bobowatymi grubonasiennymi. Biul. Inst. Hod. Aklim. Rośl. 289, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.37317/biul-2020-0021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37317/biul-2020-0021
  29. Wrzaszcz W., Prandecki K., 2020. Rolnictwo a Europejski Zielony Ład. Zagad. Ekon. Rol./ Probl. Agric. Econ. 4(365), 156–179. https://doi.org/10.30858/zer/131841 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30858/zer/131841

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.