Agronomy Science, przyrodniczy lublin, czasopisma up, czasopisma uniwersytet przyrodniczy lublin
Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 64 No. 4 (2009)

Articles

The Influence of interaction between spring wheat and spring barley on accumulation of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in plants

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/as.2009.4.11
Submitted: May 20, 2020
Published: 2009-12-21

Abstract

In a pot experiment, the influence of interacton between spring wheat and spring barley on content of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in plants was assessed. The experiment was conducted according to the additive pattern. The experimental factors were: 1. the level of NPK mineral fertilisation: standard and the dose increased in relation to it by 50%; 2. method of plants sowing: in the mix and in pure stand. The plants for determination originated from 5 growth stages: germination, seedling growth, tillering, stem elongation, inflorescence emergence and ripening. It was shown that in the mix, as compared to pure stand cultivation, wheat contained less nitrogen and potassium during the inflorescence emergence and ripening stages and less phosphorus during germination and stem elongation. Mixed sowing increased the content of phosphorus in its mass during ripening and of potassium from germination until inflorescence emergence. Barley in the mix was characterised by a higher content of nitrogen during ripening and phosphorus during germination. In its over the ground parts a decrease in the accumulation of potassium during the period from germination until inflorescence formation was recorded. 

 

References

  1. Aerts R., Boot R. G. A., Van der Aart P. J. M., 1991. The relation between above-and belowground biomass allocation patterns and competitive ability. Oecologia 87, 551–559.
  2. Keddy P.A., 1989. Competition. Population and community biology serires. Chapman and Hall, London.
  3. Majkowski K., Szempliński W., Budzyński W., Wróbel E., Dubis B., 1993. Uprawa jęczmienia jarego i owsa w siewie czystym i mieszanym. Rocz. AR w Poznaniu, 243, 73–83.
  4. Noworolnik K., Sułek A., 2000. Wpływ gęstości siewu na plonowanie mieszanki jęczmienia z pszenicą w zależności od udziału komponentów, terminu siewu i jakości gleby. Rocz. AR w Poznaniu, 325, Rolnictwo, 58, 83–8.
  5. Parylak D., 1996. Competitive uptake of nutrients by spring barley and weeds. Fragm. Agron., 13(4), 68–74.
  6. Ponce R. G., 1987. Competition between wheat and wild oat (Avena Sterilis L.) according to the proximity of their time of emergence. Plant and Soil, 102, 133–136.
  7. Satorre E.H., Snaydon R.W., 1992. A comparison of root and shoot competition between spring cereals and Avena fatua. Weed Res., 32, 45–55.
  8. Semere T., Froud-Williams R.J., 2001. The effect of pea cultivar and water stress on root and shoot competition between vegetative plants of maize and pea. J. Appl. Ecol., 38, 137–145.
  9. Sobkowicz P., 2000. Wpływ konkurencji między jęczmieniem, owsem i pszenżytem, w mieszankach uprawianych w zróżnicowanej ilości wysiewu, na plon białka. Rocz. AR w Poznaniu, 325, Rolnictwo, 58, 111–123.
  10. Sobkowicz P., 2001. Nadziemna i podziemna konkurencja między jęczmieniem jarym i owsem w mieszance w początkowym okresie wzrostu. Fragm. Agron., 2(70), 103–119.
  11. Sobkowicz P., 2003. Konkurencja międzygatunkowa w jarych mieszankach zbożowych. Zesz. Nauk. AR Wrocław., 458, Rozprawy 194, 5–105.
  12. Treder K., Wanic M., Nowicki J., 2008a. Competition between spring wheat and spring barley under conditions of diversified fertilisation. Part 1. Influence on selected morphological characteristics of plants. Acta Agroph., 11(3), 767–780.
  13. Treder K., Wanic M., Nowicki J., 2008b. Competition between spring wheat and spring barley under conditions of diversified fertilisation. Part 2. Influence on biomass of plants and rate of its accumulation. Acta Agroph., 11(3), 781–797.
  14. Zawiślak K., Kostrzewska M., 2000. Konkurencja pokarmowa chwastów w łanach pszenicy ozimej uprawianej w płodozmianie i w wieloletniej monokulturze. I. Zagęszczenie i skład florystyczny zbiorowiska chwastów. Ann. UMCS, sec. E, Agricultura, Suppl., 16, 245–251.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.