Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
ASPHC Baner

Vol. 20 No. 1 (2021)

Articles

Comparison of nutrient uptake by strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) varieties according to phenological stages

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2021.1.5
Submitted: 1 October 2019
Published: 26.02.2021

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the amounts of nutrient elements taken up from the soil to the roots, stems and leaves, in five different growing periods and to the fruits in the harvesting period, in two different strawberry cultivars. For this purpose, ten plantations were selected for each cultivar. The roots, stems and leaves were separated and the amounts of nutrient elements taken up by each part was determined according to the development period. In this study, which was conducted over two years, the physico-chemical characteristics of the soils of the plantations from which the samples taken were determined. In both cultivars, the largest amounts of the macronutrients nitrogen, phosphorus, calcium and magnesium and of the micronutrient manganese were taken up at all phenological stages by the leaves, followed by the roots and stems. The amounts of potassium that taken up were as follows in the order of most to least: at the beginning and in the harvest period, leaves, stems and roots; in other periods, leaves, roots and stems. For the nutrient elements iron, copper and zinc, this comparison showed variation between parts of the plants according to year, variety and period. In general, statistically significant correlations were found between the nutrient elements taken up at different periods by different parts of the plant of different varieties in both years. Significant differences were shown among the years in the amounts of N, P, K, Ca and Mg taken up by the fruits of the Camarosa variety, and of Fe only by the Festival variety.

References

  1. Adak, N. (2019). Effect of different K+/Ca(2+) ratios on yield, quality and physiological disorder in soilless strawberry cultivation. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 18(2), 229–236. DOI: 10.24326/asphc.2019.2.20
  2. Albregts, E.E., Howard, C.M. (1978). Elemental composition of fresh strawberry fruit. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 103(3), 293–296.
  3. Albregts, E.E., Howard, C.M. (1980). Accumulation of nutrients by strawberry plants and fruit grown in annual hill culture. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 105(3), 386–388.
  4. Atasay, A., Türemiş, N. (2008). Eğirdir (Isparta) Koşullarında Organik Çilek Yetiştiriciliğinin Uygulanabilirliği Üzerine Bir Araştırma. [An Investigation on the Application of Organic Strawberry Production in Eğirdir Isparta Conditions]. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18(3), 72–81.
  5. Baldi, E., Nestby, R., Raynal-Lacroix, C., Lieten, P., Salo, T., Pivot, D., Lucchi, P.L., Baruzzi, G., Faedi, W., Tagliavini, M. (2003). Uptake and partitioning of major nutrients by strawberry plants. In: Euro Berry Symposium-COST-Action 836 Final Workshop, Acta Hortic., 649, 197–200. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.649.36
  6. Bottoms, T.G., Hartz, T.K., Cahn, M.D., Farrara, B.F. (2013). Crop and soil nitrogen dynamics in annual strawberry production in California. HortScience, 48(8), 1034–1039. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.48.8.1034
  7. Bouyoucos, G.J. (1962). Hydrometer Method Improved for Making Particle Size Analysis of Soil. Agron. J., 54(5), 464–465. DOI: 10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028x
  8. Bremner, J.M. (1965). Total Nitrogen. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Black, C.A. (ed). Amer. Soc. Agr. Inc., Publisher, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 1149–1178.
  9. Bulduk, E., Erdal, İ. (2012). Genotipsel farklılığın çileğin mineral beslenmesi üzerine etkisi [Effect of genotypic differences on mineral nutritions of strawberry]. Derim, 29(1), 59–70.
  10. Çakıcı, H., Aydın, Ş. (2005). Emiralem-İzmir Yöresi Çilek Plantasyonlarının Beslenme Durumu [Nutritional Status of Strawberry Plantations in Emiralem-İzmir]. Ege Univ. Ziraat Fak. Derg., 42(1),155–166.
  11. Erenoğlu, B., Baş, B., Ufuk, U., Erbil, Y. (1999). Marmara Bölgesine Uygun Yeni Çilek Çeşitlerinin Seçimi [Selection of New Strawberry Varieties Suitable for Marmara Region]. Atatürk Bahçe Kültürleri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Bilimsel Araştırmalar ve İncelemeler, Yayın, 128: 26 s.
  12. Fattahi, M., Gholami, M. (2009). Nutrient content changes in strawberry plant parts at different development stages. J. Appl. Hortic. (Lucknow), 11(2), 150–152.
  13. Fawzi, A.F.A., El-Fouly, M.M. (1980). Soil and leaf analysis of potassium in different areas in Egypt. In: Role of potassium crop production, Sourat, A., El-Fouly, M.M. (eds.). IPI, Bern, 73–80.
  14. Hakala, M., Lapveteläinen, A., Huopalahti, R., Kallio, H., Tahvonen, R. (2003). Effect of Varieties and Cultivation Conditions on the Composition of Strawberries. J. Food Comp. Anal., 16, 67–80. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-1575(02)00165-5
  15. Hemphill, R., Martin L.W. (1992). Microwave oven-drying method for determining total solids of strawberries. HortScience, 27(12), 1326.
  16. Isaac, R.A., Johnson, W.C. (1992). Determination of P, K, Ca, Mg, Mn, Fe, Al, B, Cu, and Zn in plant by emission spectroscopy. In: Plant Analysis Reference Procedures for Southern Region of the United States College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Plank, C.O. (ed.). North Carolina Depart. Agr. Agron. Div. NC, 41–44.
  17. Martin, M., Roson, R. (1980). Mineral composition of strawberry plants at different stages in the growth cycle. An. Edafol. Agrobiol., 39(5/6), 1019–1031.
  18. Mengel, K., Kirkby, E.A. (1982). Principles of plant nutrition, Intern. Potash Inst., Bern.
  19. Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S., Dean, L.A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Dep. Agric. Circ. 939, 1–19.
  20. Özden, A., Ayanoğlu, H. (2002). Nutritional status of strawberry plantings near Silifke in Turkey. In: IV. International Strawberry Symposium, Acta Hortic., 567, 443–446. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.567.92
  21. Polat, M. (2005). Ankara (Ayaş) Koşullarında Organik Çilek Yetiştiriciliği Olanaklarının Araştırılması [Investigation of Organic Strawberry Growing Opportunities in Ankara (Ayaş) Conditions]. Ankara Üniv. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, pp. 116.
  22. Reuterberg, E., Kremkus, F. (1951). Bestimmung von Gesamthumus und Alkalischen Humusstoffen im Boden [Determination of the Total Humus and the Alkaline Humus Substances in the Soil]. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 54(3). DOI: 10.1002/jpln.19510540305
  23. Rieger, M. (2006). Introduction to fruit crops. Haworth Press, USA, pp. 462.
  24. Seferoğlu, S., Kılıç, I. (2002). Determining the soil nutrition level of strawberry fields in Aydın province. 13th Int. Fertilizer Symp., Tokat, 342–349.
  25. Soil Survey Manual, Soil Survey Division Staff (1993). United States Department of Agriculture, Handbook No: 18, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C, USA. pp. 410.
  26. Tagliavini, M., Scudellazi, D., Marangoni, B., Toselli, M. (1996). Nitrogen fertilization management in orchards to reconcile productivity and environmental aspects. In: Fertilizers and environment, Rodriguez-Barrueco, C. (ed.). Springer, Dordrecht, 161–170.
  27. U.S Soil Survey Staff (1951). Soil Survey Manual. U.S. Dept. Agr. Handbook 18. U.S Govt. Printing Office. Washington DC. USA.
  28. Vandecasteele, B., Debode, J., Willekens, K., Van Delm, T. (2018). Recycling of P and K in circular horticulture through compost application in sustainable growing media for fertigated strawberry cultivation. Eur. J. Agron., 96, 131–145. DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2017.12.002
  29. Zengin, M. (2012). Toprak ve Bitki Analiz Sonuçlarının Yorumlanmasında Temel İlkeler [Basic Principles in Interpreting Soil and Plant Analysis Results In: Plant Nutrition]. In: Bitki Besleme, Karaman, M.R. (ed.). Gübretaş Rehber Kitaplar Dizisi, 2, 37–961.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.