Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 13 No. 6 (2014)

Articles

EFFECT OF PRUNING TIME AND METHOD ON HYBRID GRAPEVINE (Vitis sp.) ‘HASANSKI SLADKI’ BERRY MATURITY IN A COOL CLIMATE CONDITIONS

Submitted: December 2, 2020
Published: 2014-12-31

Abstract

Climate and weather conditions are important factors influencing grapevine growth and fruit quality. Cooler regions are expected to be unsuitable for grape growing due to insufficient maturation and variability of quality parameters. Therefore, a field trial was conducted, aimed to determine the effect of pruning time on low cordon cane (CP) and spur pruned (SP) grapevines of the hybrid cultivar Hasanski Sladki in a cool climate conditions. A vineyard, with the low double trunk (25 cm in height) training system, was established at the experimental station of the Estonian University of Life Sciences (58°23’17’’ N, 26°41’50’’ E) in June 2007. The treatments were carried out in autumn after leaf fall and in spring at the two leaf phase in 2010/2011 and 2011/2012. Pruning time affected grape maturity parameters depending on pruning method. Autumn SP increased the soluble solids content from 18.5 to 19.8 °Brix in 2011 and from 17.1 to 18.0 in 2012. Titratable
acids content was high in both experimental years ranging from 1.3 to 2.1 g 100 g-1, and only autumn CP decreased it. Pruning in spring significantly decreased the soluble solids/ titratable acids for both pruning methods. The timing of SP affected the maturity index (MI = °Brix × pH2) variably; in 2011, spring pruning decreased the index whereas; the index was increased in 2012. Spring pruning decreased the total phenolics up to 22% in both treatments in the two years mean. In CP, spring pruning increased anthocyanins content from 31 to 77 mg 100 g-1 in 2012.

References

Andersen P.C., Sims C.A., 1991. Yield and quality of vitis hybrid ‘suwannee’ as affected by training system and pruning severity. Hort. Sci., 26(4), 366–368.
Cheng G.W., Breen P.J., 1991. Activity of phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL) and concentrations of anthocyanins and phenolics in developing strawberry fruit. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 116, 865–868.
Chone X., Van Leeuwen C., Chery P., Ribereau-Gayon P., 2001. Terroir influence on water status and nitrogen status of non-irrigated Cabernet sauvignon (Vitis vinifera). Vegetative development, must and wine composition (example of a Medoc top estate vineyard, Saint Julien area, Bordeaux, 1997). S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic., 22, 1, 8–15.
Coombe B.G., Dundon R.J., Short A.W.S., 1980. Indices of sugar-acidity as ripeness criteria for wine grapes. J. Sci. Food Agric., 3, 495–502.
Dami I., Hamman R., Stushnoff C., Wolf T.K., 2000. Use of oils and alginate to delay bud break of grapevines. Proceedings of the American Society for Enology and Viticulture 50th Anniversary Meeting (Am. Soc. Enol. Vitic. Davis, California, USA), 73–76.
Falcão L.D., Chaves E.S., Burin V.M., Falcão A.P., Gris E.F., Bonin V., Bordignon-Luiz M.T., 2008. Maturity of Cabernet Sauvignon berries from grapevines grown with two different training systems in a new grape growing region in Brazil. Cien. Invest. Agro., 35(3), 271–282.
Ferrer-Gallego R., Hernandez-Hierro J.M., Rivas-Gonzalo J.C., Escribano-Bailon M.T., 2012. Influence of climatic conditions on the phenolic composition of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Graciano. Anal. Cim. Acta, 732, 73–77.
Fournand D., Vicens A., Sidhoum L., Souquet J.-M., Moutounet M., Cheynier V., 2006. Accumulation and extractability of grape skin tannins and anthocyanins at different advanced physiological stages. J. Agric. Food Chem., 54, 7331–7338.
Friend A.P., Trought M.C.T., 2007. Delayed winter spur-pruning in New Zealand can alter yield components of Merlot grapevines. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 13, 157–164.
Gustafsson J.-G., Mårtensson A., 2005. Review article: Potential for extending Scandinavian wine cultivation. Acta Agric. Scand., Sect. B-Soil Plant Sci., 55, 82–97.
Hart M., Mount Ashwabay Vineyard and Orchard, Bayfield, WI. Personal communication, 2008.
Haselgrove L., Botting D., van Heeswijck R., Hųj P.B., Dry P.R., Ford C., Land P.G.I., 2000. Canopy microclimate and berry composition: The effect of bunch exposure on the phenolic composition of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz grape berries. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 6, 141–149.
Hülya Orak H., 2007. Total antioxidant activities, phenolics, anthocyanins, polyphenol oxidase activities of selected red grape cultivars and their correlations. Sci. Hort., 111, 235–241.
Hunter J.J., de Villiers O.T., Watts J.E., 1991. The effect of partial defoliation on quality characteristics of Vitis vinifera L cv. Cabernet Sauvignon grapes 1. Sugars, acids and pH. S-Afr. J. Enol. Vitic., 12, 42–50.
Intrieri C., Poni S., 1998. Training systems and pruning methods in grapes: Physiological aspects and their connection with full mechanization techniques [Abstract]. Riv. Frutticol. Ortoflor., 60, 77–85.
Iyer M.M., Sacks G.L., Padilla-Zakour O.I., 2012. Assessment of the validity of maturity metrics for predicting the volatile composition of Concord grape juice. J. Food Sci., 77(3), C319–C325.
Kivistik J., Kask K., Jänes H., Libek A-V., Piir R., Univer T., 2010. Fruit and berry crop cultivars recommended for cultivation in Estonian conditions. In: Pomology: fruits and berries in Estonia, Appendix 5. Recommendations through 1985–2007. Tallinn, TEA Publi., 389–392.
Keller M., Mills L.J., 2007. Effect of pruning on recovery and productivity of cold-injured Merlot grapevines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 58(3), 351–357.
Lisek J., 2007. Frost damage of grapevines in Poland following the winter of 2005/2006. Folia Hortic., Ann., 19/2, 69–78.
Martin S.R., Dunn G.M., 2000. Effect of pruning time and hydrogen cyan amide on budburst and subsequent phenology of Vitis vinifera L. variety Cabernet Sauvignon in central Victoria. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 6, 31–39.
Nicolosi E., Continella A., Gentile A., Cicala A., Ferlito F., 2012. Influence of early leaf removal on autochthonous and international grapevines in Cicily. Sci. Hort., 146, 1–6.
Palliotti A., Gardi T., Berrios J.G., Civardi S., Poni S., 2012. Early source limitation as a tool for yield control and wine quality improvement in a high-yielding red Vitis vinifera L. cultivar. Sci. Hort., 145, 10–16.
Peña-Neira A., Duenas M., Duarte A., Hernandez T., Estrella T., Loyola E., 2004. Effects of ripening stages and of plant vegetative vigor on the phenolic composition of grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Cabernet Sauvignon in the Maipo Valley (Chile). Vitis, 43(2), 52 –57.
Plocher T., co-author of Northern Winework. Personal communication, 2008.
Ryan J.M., Revilla E., 2003. Anthocyanin composition of Cabernet Sauvignon and Tempranillo grapes at different stages of ripening. J. Agric. Food Chem., 51, 3372–3378.
Schalkwyk H., Archer E., 2000. Determining optimum ripeness in wine grapes. Wynboer: A Technical Guide for Wine Producers. Cellar, May.
Slinkard K., Singleton V.L., 1977. Total phenol analyses: automation and comparison with manual methods. Am. J. Enol. Viticult., 28, 49–55.
Smiley L.A., Domoto P., Nonnecke G., Miller W.W., 2008. Cold climate cultivars: A review of cold climate grape cultivars – ‘Baltica’. Iowa State University, Viticulture home page. http://viticulture.hort.iastate.edu/cultivars/cultivars.html (accessed: 02.04.2013)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.