Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
ASPHC Baner

ONLINE FIRST

Short communication

Influence of cultivar and rootstock on fruit cracking index of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2026.5686
Submitted: 30 March 2026
Published: 18.08.2026

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of cultivar and rootstock on the fruit cracking index and harvest date of sweet cherry under the agro-ecological conditions of Trebinje (Bosnia and Herzegovina). Four Italian sweet cherry cultivars (Marysa, Sweet Gabriel, Sweet Valina, and Sweet Stephany) grafted onto two vegetative rootstocks (Gisela 5 and Gisela 6) were evaluated during the 2025 growing season. The results showed statistically significant differences among combinations cultivar/rootstock in both harvest date and fruit cracking index. The lowest cracking index was recorded for Sweet Stephany grafted onto Gisela 6, while the highest susceptibility
was observed for Marysa grafted onto the same rootstock. Overall, cultivars grafted onto Gisela 6 exhibited higher cracking susceptibility compared to those grafted onto Gisela 5. A strong and highly significant negative correlation (r = −0.91**) was established between harvest date and fruit cracking index, indicating that earlier-ripening cultivars were more prone to cracking. The findings highlight the importance of selecting appropriate cultivars and rootstocks in reducing the risk of fruit cracking. However, in order to provide more valuable information for the introduction of new sweet cherry cultivars and the establishment of sustainable orchards under similar agroecological conditions, it is necessary to extend the study over two or even three years, as only in this way can reliable and relevant data be obtained.

References

  1. Balbotín, C., Ayala, H., Bastías, R.M., et al. (2013). Cracking in sweet cherries: A comprehensive review from a physiological, molecular, and genomic perspective. Chil. J. Agric. Res., 73, 66–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392013000100010
  2. Balbontín, C., Ayala, H., Rubilar, J., Cote, J., Figueroa, C.R. (2014). Transcriptional analysis of cell wall and cuticle related genes during fruit development of two sweet cherry cultivars with contrasting levels of cracking tolerance. Chilean J. Agric. Res., 74(2), 162–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392014000200006
  3. Boskov, D., Milatovic, D., Rakonjac, V., et al. (2022). The phenolic profile of sweet cherry fruits influenced by cultivar/rootstock combination. Plants, 12(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010103
  4. Christensen, J.V. (1996). Rain–induced fruit cracking of sweet cherries: its causes and prevention. In: A.D. Webster, N.E. Looney (eds.), Cherries: Crop Physiology, Production and Uses. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 297–327.
  5. Duralija, B., Arko, B., Čmelik, Z., et al. (2007). Influence of cultivar and rootstock on sweet cherry fruit cracking. Pomol. Croat, 13(2), 97–106.
  6. Filyova, P. (2024). Study of the influence of the rootstock on the phenological development of the sweet cherry. J. Mt. Agric. Balk., 27(6), 295–307.
  7. Fisher, R.A. (1953). The design of experiments. Oliver and Boyd, London, UK.
  8. Granger, A.R. (2005). The effect of tree rootstocks on yield and fruiting of sweet cherry. Acta Hortic., 667, 233–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.667.34
  9. Huang, W., Gao, Z., Wang, L., et al. (2019). Advances in research on cherry fruit cracking: Causes, prevention and control. Front. Plant Sci., 10, 986.
  10. Kaya, T., Schmidt, H., Bauer, M. (2026). The effects of different trunk heights in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) on some fruit quality parameters and bioactive components at harvest and postharvest. Mitt. Klosterneubg., 76, 112–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/mittklbg-2024-0005
  11. Khadivi-Khub, A. (2015) Physiological and genetic factors influencing fruit cracking. Acta Physiol. Plant., 37, 1718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-014-1718-2
  12. Koumanov, K.S. (2015). On the mechanisms of the sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) fruit cracking: Swelling or shrinking?. Sci. Hortic., 184, 169–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.01.002
  13. Measham, P.F., Bound, S.A., Gracie, A.J., Wilson, S.J. (2009). Incidence and type of cracking in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) are affected by genotype and season. Crop Pasture Sci., 60, 1002–1008. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP08410
  14. Milatović, D., Đurović D. (2010). Susceptibility of sweet cherry cultivars to rain induced fruit cracking. J. Pomol., 44(171–172), 115–121.
  15. Sansavini, S., Lugli, S. (2008). Sweet cherry breeding programs in Europe and Asia. Acta Hortic., 795, 41–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.795.1
  16. Schuller, E., Mayer, F., Hofer, P. (2016). Mapping and description of old cherry trees and regional cherry cultivars in Stoob, ittelburgenland. Mitt. Klosterneubg., 66(1), 113–126.
  17. Simon, G. (2006). Review on rain-induced fruit cracking of sweet cherries (Prunus avium L.). Int. J. Hortic. Sci., 12(3), 27–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.31421/IJHS/12/3/654
  18. Simon, G., Hratkó, K., Magyar, L. (2004). Fruit quality of sweet cherry cultivars grafted on four different rootstock. Acta Hortic., 658, 365–370. http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.658.53
  19. Usenik, V., Fajt, N., Mikulic-Petkovsek, M., Stampar, F., Veberic, R. (2010). Sweet cherry pomological and biochemical characteristics influenced by rootstock. J. Agric. Food Chem., 58(8), 4928–4933. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf903755b

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.