Przejdź do głównego menu Przejdź do sekcji głównej Przejdź do stopki
ASPHC Baner

Tom 18 Nr 4 (2019)

Artykuły

Long-term impact of deficit irrigation on the physiology and growth of grapevine cv. ‘Prima’ grafted on various rootstocks

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2019.4.6
Przesłane: 5 sierpnia 2019
Opublikowane: 2019-08-07

Abstrakt

Testing the globally popular grapevine rootstocks for affinity with new grape cultivars or tolerance potential to stress factors like drought is essential for districts where supplemental irrigation is more frequently needed due to the pressures of a global climate change. In this study, a seasonal evaluation of leaf gas exchange, leaf temperature, leaf greenness (chlorophyll content prediction) and vegetative development of Vitis vinifera L. cv. ‘Prima’ grafted to different rootstock genotypes having great variability in drought tolerance, were investigated. The experiment was conducted in a controlled experimental glasshouse on two-year-old soilless grown ‘Prima’ vines grafted on nine rootstocks [44-53 M, 5 BB, 140 Ru, Ramsey (Syn. Salt Creek), 99 R, Saint George (Syn. Rupestris du Lot), 41 B, 1613 C and 420 A]. A long-term deficit irrigation (DI) was imposed before bud break by reducing water supply to 40% of field capacity derived from concurrent measurements of water content of growth medium and maintained until the end of vegetation period. The rootstocks significantly modulated the physiology and vegetative growth of the scion cultivar in varying degrees according to their genetic features. Among them, 140 Ru rootstock found to be more prominent in terms of mitigating the adverse effect of water deficit on physiology and growth of the scion genotype ‘Prima’ as there were no significant difference between deficit and full irrigation treatments for most of parameters investigated. In general, the ‘Prima’ scion performed better when the rootstocks coming from V. berlandieri × V. rupestris pedigree rather than the others including V. berlendieri × V. riparia.

Bibliografia

  1. Carbonneau, A. (1985). The early selection of grapevine rootstocks for resistance to drought conditions. Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 36, 195–198.
  2. Chaves, M.M., Zarrouk, O., Francisco, R., Costa, J.M., Santos, T., Regalado, A.P., Rodrigues, M.L., Lopes, C.M. (2010). Grapevine under deficit irrigation: hints from physiological and molecular data. Ann. Bot., 105, 661–676.
  3. Corso, M., Bonghi, C. (2014). Mini review: Grapevine rootstock effects on abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Sci. Tod., 1, 108–113.
  4. Davies, W.J., Bacon, M.A., Thompson, D.S., Sobeih, W., Rodriguez, L.G. (2000) Regulation of leaf and fruit growth in plants growing in drying soil: exploitation of the plant’s chemical signalling system and hydraulic architecture to increase the efficiency of water use in agriculture. J. Exp. Bot., 51, 1617–1626.
  5. Dry, P.R., Loveys, B.R. During, H. (2000). Partial drying of the root zone of grape. I. Transient changes in shoot growth and gas exchange. Vitis, 39, 3–7.
  6. Düring, H., Loveys, B.R. (1996) Stomatal patchiness of field-grown Sultana leaves: Diurnal changes and light effects. Vitis, 35, 7–10.
  7. Ezzahouani, A., Williams, L.E. (2005). Performance of Dattier de Beyrouth and Alphonse Lavallée grapevines on eight rootstocks under dry-land conditions. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin, 39, 1–4.
  8. Galet, P. (1979). A practical ampelography: grapevine identification. Cornell Univeristy Press, Ithaca, 248p.
  9. Gambetta, G.A., Manuck, C.M., Drucker, S.T., Shaghasi, T., Fort, K., Matthews, M.A., Walker, M.A., McElrone, A.J. (2012). The relationship between root hydraulics and scion vigour across Vitis rootstocks: what role do root aquaporins play? J. Exp. Bot., 63, 6445–6455.
  10. Greer, D.H., Weedon, M.M. (2013). The impact of high temperatures on Vitis vinifera cv. Semillon grape-vine performance and berry ripening. Front. Plant Sci., 4, 491. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00491
  11. Hirayama, M., Wada, Y., Nemoto, H. (2006). Estimation of drought tolerance based on leaf temperature in upland rice breeding. Breed. Sci., 56, 47–54.
  12. Hsiao, T.C., Xu, L.K. (2000). Sensitivity of growth of roots versus leaves to water stress: biophysical analysis and relation to water transport. J. Exp. Bot., 51, 1595–1616.
  13. Jackson, M. (1997). Hormones from roots as signals for the shoots of stressed plants. Trends Plant Sci., 2, 22–28.
  14. Johnson, D.M., Woodruff, D.R., Mcculloh, K.A., Meinzer, F.C. (2009). Leaf hydraulic conductance, measured in situ, declines and recovers daily: leaf hydraulics, water potential and stomatal conductance in four temperate and three tropical tree species. Tree Physiol., 29, 879–887.
  15. Koundouras, S., Tsialtas, I.T., Zioziou, E., Nikolaou, N. (2008). Rootstock effects on the adaptive strategies of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) under contrasting water status: leaf physiological and structural responses. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 128, 86–96.
  16. Lavoie-Lamoureux, A., Sacco, D., Risse, P.A., Lovisolo, C. (2017). Factors influencing stomatal conductance in response to water availability in grapevine: a meta-analysis. Physiol Plant., 159, 468–482.
  17. Lovisolo, C., Hartung, W., Schubert, A. (2002). Whole-plant hydraulic conductance and root-to-shoot flow of abscisic acid are independently affected by water stress in grapevines. Funct. Plant Biol., 29, 1349–1356.
  18. Lovisolo, C., Lavoie-Lamoreux, A., Tramontini, S., Ferrandino, A. (2016). Grapevine adaptations to water stress: new perspectives about soil/plant interactions. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol., 28, 53–66.
  19. Lovisolo, C., Perrone, I., Carra, A., Ferrandino, A., Flexas, J., Medrano, H., Schubert, A. (2010). Drought-induced changes in development and function of grapevine (Vitis spp.) organs and in their hydraulic and non-hydraulic interactions at the whole-plant level: a physiological and molecular update. Funct. Plant Biol., 37, 98–116.
  20. Lovisolo, C., Tramontini, S., Flexas, J., Schubert, A. (2008). Mercurial inhibition of root hydraulic conductance in Vitis spp. rootstocks under water stress. Environ. Exp. Bot., 63, 178–182.
  21. Marguerti, E., Brendel, O., Lebon, E., Van Leeuwen, C., Ollat, N. (2012). Rootstock control of scion transpiration and its acclimation to water deficit are controlled by different genes. New Phytol., 194, 416–429.
  22. Miranda, T., Ebner, M., Traiser, C., Roth-Nebelsick, A. (2013). Diurnal pattern of stomatal conductance in the large-leaved temperate liana Aristolochia macrophylla depends on spatial position within the leaf lamina. Ann. Bot., 111, 905–915.
  23. Myburgh, P.A., van der Walt, L.D. (2005). Cane water content and yield responses of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sultanina to overhead irrigation during the dormant period. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic., 26, 1–5.
  24. Myburgh, P.A. (2011). Response of Vitis vinifera L. Merlot to low frequency irrigation and partial root zone drying in the Western Cape coastal region – part II. Vegetative growth, yield and quality. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic., 32, 104–116.
  25. Okamoto, G., Kuwamura, T., Hirano, K. (2004). Effects of water deficit stress on leaf and berry ABA and berry ripening in Chardonnay grapevines. Vitis, 43, 15–17.
  26. Pagliarani, C., Vitali, M., Ferrero, M., Vitulo, N., Incarbone, M., Lovisolo, C., Valle, G., Schubert, A. (2017). The accumulation of miRNAs differentially modulated by drought stress is affected by grafting in grapevine. Plant Physiol., 2180–2195.
  27. Padgett-Johnson, M., Williams, L.E., Walker, M.A. (2000). The influence of Vitis riparia rootstock on water relations and gas exchange of Vitis vinifera cv. Carignan scion under non-irrigated conditions. Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 51, 137–143.
  28. Perrone, I., Gambino, G., Chitarra, W., Vitali, M., Pagliarani, C., Riccomagno, N., Balestrini, R., Kaldenhoff, R., Uehlein, N., Gribaudo, I., Schubert, A., Lovisolo, C. (2012). The grapevine root-specific aquaporin VvPIP2;4N controls root hydraulic conductance and leaf gas exchange under well-watered conditions but not under water stress. Plant Physiol., 160, 965–977.
  29. Pongracz, D.P. (1983). Rootstocks for grapevines. David Philip Pub., Cape Town, 150 pp.
  30. Sabir, A. (2013). Improvement of grafting efficiency in hard grafting grape Berlandieri hybrid rootstocks by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Sci. Hort., 164, 24–29.
  31. Sabir, A. (2016). Physiological and morphological responses of grapevine (V. vinifera L. cv. ‘Italiaʼ) leaf to water deficit under different rootstock effects. Acta. Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 15, 135–148.
  32. Sabir, A., Kara, Z. (2010). Silica gel application to control water runoff from rootzone microenvironment’s climate of grapevine rootstocks grown under drought condition. International Sustainable Water and Wastewater Management Symposium, 26−28 October, Konya, Turkey, 2, 1365–1372.
  33. Sabir, A., Yazar, K. (2015). Diurnal dynamics of stomatal conductance and leaf temperature of grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) in response to daily climatic variables. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 14, 3–15.
  34. Sabir, A., Dogan, Y., Tangolar, S., Kafkas, S. (2010). Analysis of genetic relatedness among grapevine rootstocks by AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) markers. J. Food Agric. Environ., 8, 210–213.
  35. Satisha, J., Prakash, G.S., Venugopalan, R. (2006). Modeling of the effect of physio-biochemical parameters in water use efficiency of grape varieties, rootstocks and their stionic combinations under moisture stress conditions. Turk. J. Agric. For., 30, 261–271.
  36. Smart, D.R., Schwass, E., Lakso, A., Morano, L. (2006). Grapevine rooting patterns: a comprehensive analysis and a review. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic., 57, 89–104.
  37. Soar, C.J., Dry, P.R., Loveys, B.R. (2006). Scion photosynthesis and leaf gas exchange in Vitis vinifera L. vv. Shiraz: mediation of rootstock effects via xylem sap ABA. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 12, 82–96.
  38. Southey, J.M. (1992). Root distribution of different grapevine rootstocks on a relatively saline soil. South Afr. J. Enol. Vitic., 13, 1–9.
  39. Stavrinides, M.C., Daane, K.M., Lampinen, B.D., Mills, N.J. (2010). Plant water stress, leaf temperature, and spider mite (Acari: Tatranychidae) outbreaks in California vineyards. Environ. Entomol., 39, 1232–1241.
  40. Steppe, K., de Pauw, D.J.W., Lemeur, R. (2008). A step towards new irrigation scheduling strategies using plant-based measurements and mathematical modelling. Irrig. Sci., 26, 505–517
  41. Stoll, M., Loveys, B., Dry, P. (2000). Hormonal changes induced by partial rootzone drying of irrigated grapevine. J. Exp. Bot., 51, 1627–1634.
  42. Sucu, S., Yagci, A., Yildirim, K. (2017). Changes in morphological, physiological traits and enzyme activity of grafted and ungrafted grapevine rootstocks under drought stress. Erwerbs-Obstbau, DOI: 10.1007/s10341-017-0345-7
  43. Tandonnet, J.P., Cookson, S.J., Vivin, P., Ollat, N. (2010). Scion genotype controls biomass allocation and root development in grafted grapevine. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 16, 290–300.
  44. Tramontini, S., van Leuwen, C., Domec, J.C., Irvine, A.D., Basteau, C., Vitali, M., Schulz, O.M., Lovisolo, C. (2013a). Impact of soil texture and water availability on the hydraulic control of plant and grape-berry development. Plant Soil, 368, 215–230.
  45. Tramontini, S., Vitali, M., Centioni, L., Schubert, A., Lovisolo, C. (2013b). Rootstock control of scion response to water stress in grapevine. Environ. Expert. Bot., 93, 20–26.
  46. Uddling, J., Gelang-Alfredsson, J., Piikki, K., Pleijel, H. (2007). Evaluating the relationship between leaf chlorophyll concentration and SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter readings. Photosynth. Res., 91, 37–46.
  47. Vandeleur, R.K., Mayo, G., Shelden, M.C., Gilliham, M., Kaiser, B.N., Tyerman, S.D. (2009). The role of plasma membrane intrinsic protein aquaporins in water transport through roots: diurnal and drought stress responses reveal different strategies between isohydric and anisohydric cultivars of grapevine. Plant Physiol., 149, 445–460.
  48. Williams, L.E. (2010). Interaction of rootstock and applied water amounts at various fractions of estimated evapotranspiration (ETc) on productivity of Cabernet Sauvignon. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 16, 434–444.
  49. Wolpert, J., Walker, A., Weber, E., Bettiga, L., Smith, R.J., Verdegaal, P. (1994). Rootstocks and phylloxera: a status report for coastal and northern California. Vineyard Views, 1−17.
  50. Wu, Y., Cosgrove, D.J. (2000). Adaptation of roots to low water potentials by changes in cell wall extensibility and cell wall proteins. J. Exp. Bot., 51, 1543–1553.
  51. Yordanov, I., Velikova, V., Tsonev, T. (2000). Plant responses to drought, acclimation, and stress tolerance. Photosynthetica, 38, 171–186.
  52. Yuan, G.F., Jia, C.G., Li, Z., Sun, B., Zhang, L.P., Liu, N., Wang, Q.M. (2010). Effect of brassinosteroids on drought resistance and abscisic acid concentration in tomato under water stress. Sci. Hortic., 126, 103–108.
  53. Zufferey, V., Cochard, H., Ameglio, T., Spring, J.L., Viret, O. (2011). Diurnal cycles of embolism formation and repair in petioles of grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. Chasselas). J. Exp. Bot., 62(11), 3885–3894. DOI:10.1093/jxb/err081
  54. Zweifel, R., Steppe, K., Sterck, F.J. (2007). Stomatal regulation by microclimate and tree water relations: interpreting eco-physiological field data with a hydraulic plant model. J. Exp. Bot., 58, 2113–2131.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Podobne artykuły

<< < 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 > >> 

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.